Original page |
New page |
Status
|
Toolkit
|
Toolkit |
Toolkit of the IEHIAS |
Done
|
Data |
Category:IEHIAS Data |
Done
|
Context |
Context of IEHIAS |
Done
|
Geographic |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Administrative |
Not worth doing, use Administrative boundaries - EuroBoundaryMap |
Done
|
Topography |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Population / Demography |
Category:IEHIAS Population/Demography |
Done
|
Population numbers/distribution |
Category:Population numbers/distribution |
Done
|
EU population: Eurostat |
EU population: Eurostat |
Done
|
EU age/sex stratified population: 100 metre grid |
EU age/sex stratified population: 100 metre grid |
Matleena
|
Administrative boundaries - EuroBoundaryMap |
Administrative boundaries - EuroBoundaryMap |
Done
|
EU age/sex stratified population: LAU2 |
EU age/sex stratified population: LAU2 |
Done
|
EU population totals: 100 metre grid |
EU population totals: 100 metre grid |
Done
|
EU age- and gender- stratified population data: EMEP grid (2010, 2020, 2030 and 2050) |
EU age- and gender- stratified population data |
Done
|
Behaviour / Lifestyle |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Socio-economic status |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Environmental |
Category:IEHIAS Environmental factors |
Done
|
General environmental data sources |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
ExpoPlatform: Web based platform for exposure assessment |
ExpoPlatform: Web based platform for exposure assessment |
Done
|
Agents |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Chemicals |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Heavy metals |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
POPS |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Radiation |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Wastes |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Electromagnetic radiation |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Noise |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Sources |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Infrastructure |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Activities |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Land cover / use |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Releases |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Emission factors |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Emission factors for agriculture |
Emission factors for agriculture |
Done
|
Emission scenarios |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Emissions |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Environmental media / processes |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Air pollution |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Climate/meteorology |
IEHIAS Climate/meteoroly |
Done
|
Indoor environments |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Soil |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Water quality |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
ESDB: European Soil Database |
European soil database |
Done
|
SOTER: Soil degradation and vulnerability map |
Soil degredation and vulnerability map |
Done
|
FOREGS: Geochemical Atlas of Europe |
Geochemical Atlas of Europe |
Done
|
Urban Atlas: land cover data |
Urban Atlas: land cover data |
Done
|
SoDa: Solar Radiation Database |
Solar Radiation Database |
Done
|
PVGIS: Photovoltaic Geographic Information System |
Photovoltaic Geographic Information System |
Done
|
CORINE 2000: Land cover map of the EU |
Land cover map of the EU |
Done
|
Exposure / Dose |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Exposure |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Intake / dose |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Biomarkers |
Category:Biomarker |
Done
|
Alkylphenols (AP) |
Alkylphenols |
Done
|
Arsenic (As) |
Arsenic |
Done
|
Bisphenol-A (BPA) |
Bisphenol-A |
Done
|
Brominated flame retardants (BFRs) |
Brominated flame retardants |
Done
|
Cadmium (Cd) |
Cadmium |
Done
|
Dioxins |
Dioxins |
Done
|
Disinfection by-products (DBPs) |
Disinfection by-products |
Done
|
Fluorinated surfactants |
Fluorinated surfactants |
Done
|
Lead (Pb) |
Lead |
Done
|
Organochlorine insecticides |
Organochlorine insecticides |
Done
|
Organophosphate pesticides (OPs) |
Organophosphate pesticides |
Done
|
Parabens |
Parabens |
Done
|
Phthalates |
Phthalates |
Done
|
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) |
Polycylic aromatic hydrocarbons |
Done
|
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) |
Polychlorinated biphenyls |
Done
|
ExpoPlatform: Intake fractions |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
ExpoPlatform: Databases and tools for exposure assessment |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Effects and impacts |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Exposure-response relationships |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Exposure / Dose / Concentration response functions |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Toxicology |
Not worth doind |
Done
|
Health effects |
Health effects in IEHIAS |
Done
|
Eurostat: health statistics for the EU |
Health statistics for the EU |
Done
|
CARE - Community Road Accident Database |
Community Road Accident Database |
Done
|
IRTAD - International Road Traffic and Accident Database |
International Road Traffic and Accident Database |
Done
|
Impact functions |
Impact functions for IEHIAS |
Done
|
Exposure-response function dataset |
Exposure-response function dataset IEHIAS |
Done
|
Monetary values Common Case Study |
Monetary values: Common Case Study |
Done
|
Morbidity |
Morbidity in IEHIAS |
Done
|
Mortality |
Mortality in IEHIAS |
Done
|
European Detailed Mortality Database |
European Detailed Mortality Database |
Done
|
Impacts |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Monetary weights and values |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Severity weights |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Examples and case studies |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Examples of assessment methods |
Category:IEHIAS assessment methods |
Done
|
Issue-framing |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Defining the question: an example from agriculture |
IEHIAS question: example from agriculture |
Done
|
Defining the question: an example from waste |
IEHIAS question: example from waste |
Done
|
Defining the question: an example from water |
IEHIAS question: example from water |
Done
|
Stakeholder consultation and engagement |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Defining the stakeholders: an example from agriculture |
Defining IEHIAS stakeholders: example from agriculture |
Done
|
Defining the stakeholders: an example from waste |
Defining IEHIAS stakeholders: example from waste |
Done
|
Defining the stakeholders: an example from water |
Defining IEHIAS stakeholders: example from water |
Done
|
Engaging stakeholders: an example from water |
Engaging IEHIAS stakeholders: example from water |
Done
|
Scenarios |
Category:IEHIAS Scenarios |
Done
|
Creating scenarios: an example from agriculture |
IEHIAS scenarios: example from agriculture |
Done
|
Main crop scenarios |
Main crop scenarios in IEHIAS |
Done
|
The impacts of the CAP |
The impacts of the CAP |
Done
|
Crop allocation |
Crop allocation |
Done
|
Energy crop scenarios |
Energy crop scenarios |
Done
|
Creating scenarios: an example from transport |
IEHIAS scenarios: example from transport |
Done
|
Creating scenarios: an example from waste |
IEHIAS scenarios: example from waste |
Done
|
Downscaling IPCC SRES-population scenarios from OECD- to the city-level: London, Rome, Helsinki |
SRES-population scenarios on city level |
Done
|
Creating scenarios: an example for UVR and skin cancer |
IEHIAS scenarios: example for UVR and skin cancer |
Done
|
Creating scenarios: an example from water |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Scoping |
Category:IEHIAS Scoping |
Done
|
Building conceptual models: an example from agriculture |
IEHIAS models: example from agriculture |
Done
|
A mind-map |
IEHIAS models: example from agriculture#A mind-map |
Done
|
A systems diagram |
IEHIAS models: example from agriculture#A systems diagram |
Done
|
Customising the causal chain: an example from agriculture |
IEHIAS models: example from agriculture#Customising the causal chain |
Done
|
Building a conceptual model: the example of transport |
IEHIAS models:example of transport |
Done
|
Scoping the assessment: ultraviolet radiation (UVR) and future skin cancer |
UVR and future skin cancer |
Done
|
Indicator selection |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Building indicators: an example from agriculture |
IEHIAS building indicators: example from agriculture |
Done
|
Computation of health impact indicators for agriculture |
Computation of health impact indicators for agriculture |
Done
|
Human biomonitoring |
Human biomonitoring in IEHIAS |
Done
|
Case study lead in Europe |
Can't do |
Done
|
Exploring the full-chain approach for PAHs using 2 case studies in Flanders and the Czech Republic |
Human biomonitoring in IEHIAS |
Done
|
The Benchmark Dose (BMD) approach for health effects of PCB exposure |
Human biomonitoring in IEHIAS |
Done
|
Case study PCBs in Slovak Republic |
Can't do |
Done
|
Population modelling |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Spatial population modelling: an example using dasymetric disaggregation |
Spatial population modelling example |
Done
|
Population map: dasymetric disaggregation |
Population map: dasymetric disaggregation |
Done
|
Source characterisation |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Characterising source intensity: an example from agriculture |
Characterising source intensity |
Done
|
Modelling road transport: examples from the Hague and Helsinki |
Modelling road transport in Helsinki and Hague |
Done
|
Network modelling: modelling waste transport |
Modelling waste transport networks |
Done
|
Route modelling |
Route modelling for IEHIAS |
Done
|
Estimating traffic (truck) volumes |
Estimating traffic volumes for IEHIAS |
Done
|
Mask area weighting: an example for pesticides |
IEHIAS mask area weighting: example for pesticides |
Done
|
Pesticide maps: mask area weighting |
IEHIAS mask area weighting: example for pesticides#Pesticide maps |
Done
|
Stochastic allocation: an example for pesticides |
IEHIAS stochastic allocation: example for pesticides |
Done
|
Pesticide maps: stochastic allocation |
IEHIAS stochastic allocation: example for pesticides#Pesticide maps |
Done
|
Emission modelling |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Modelling contaminant release: an example from agriculture |
Modelling contaminant releases: agriculture |
Done
|
Modelling contaminant releases: an example from waste |
Modelling contaminant releases: waste |
Done
|
Environmental transport and transformation |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Dispersion modelling: an example from agriculture |
Dispersion modelling: agriculture |
Done
|
Dispersion modelling: an example from waste |
Dispersion modelling: waste |
Done
|
Dispersion modelling; an example from transport |
Dispersion modelling: transport |
Done
|
Focal sum modelling: an example for agriculture |
Focal sum modelling: agriculture |
Done
|
Land use regression modelling: air pollution in Great Britain |
Modelling air pollution in Great Britain |
Done
|
Modelling ultraviolet radiation exposures: a European case study |
Modelling untraviolet radiation exposures in Europe |
Done
|
Using a Kalman filter to improve a real time air pollution model |
Kalman filter in air pollution modelling |
Done
|
Exposure modelling |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Intake and dose |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Intake fraction: exposure to pesticides in food |
Intake fraction: exposure to pesticides in food |
Done
|
Intake fractions of cadmium emissions from a large zinc smelter |
Intake fractions of cadmium emissions from a large zinc smelter |
Done
|
Using a PBPK model to assess population exposure to cadmium |
PBPK model in assessing population exposure to cadmium |
Done
|
Deriving exposure-response functions |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Combining epidemiology and toxicology for the purpose of deriving ERFs: TCDD-induced dental aberrations |
TCDD-induced dental aberrations |
Done
|
Combining epidemiology and toxicology in environmental health risk assessment |
Combining epidemiology and toxicology in environmental health risk assessment |
Done
|
Expert elicitation: case study on ultrafine particles |
Case study on ultrafine particles |
Done
|
Estimating-exposure response functions: an example from transport |
Estimating exposure-response functions: transport |
Done
|
Estimating exposure-response functions: pesticides, PM and endotoxins from agriculture |
Estimating exposure-response functions: agriculture |
Done
|
Health effects |
Health effects of the IEHIAS |
Done
|
Estimating baseline skin cancer incidence for London, Helsinki and Rome |
Estimating baseline skin cancer incidence |
Done
|
Estimating health effects: UVR and skin cancer |
Estimating health effects for UVR and skin cancer |
Done
|
Health impact modelling: ultraviolet radiation and non-melanoma skin cancer |
Health impact modelling for UVR and non-melanoma skin cancer |
Done
|
Health impact modelling: ultraviolet radiation and melanoma skin cancer |
Health impact modelling for UVR and melanoma skin cancer |
Done
|
Calculating attributable cancer incidence: an example from waste |
Calculating attributable cancer incidence: waste |
Done
|
Estimating health effects: an example from waste |
Estimating health effects: waste |
Done
|
Impact analysis |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Calculating DALYs: an example from waste |
Calculating DALYs: waste |
Done
|
Integrated environmental and health impact assessment of waste management in Lazio (Italy) |
Integrated environmental and health impact assessment of waste management |
Done
|
DALY calculations: UVR and skin cancer |
Calculating DALYs: UVR and skin cancer |
Done
|
Impact analysis: an example from transport |
Impact analysis: transport |
Done
|
Uncertainty analysis |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Qualitative uncertainty assessment: a worked example |
Qualitative uncertainty assessment example |
Done
|
Characterising uncertainty |
File:Characterising uncertainty iehias.pdf |
Done
|
Uncertainty in the agriculture case study |
Uncertainty analysis: agriculture |
Done
|
Sensitivity analysis: ultraviolet radiation (UVR) and skin cancer |
Sensitivity analysis: UVR and skin cancer |
Done
|
Uncertainty analysis: an example from waste |
Uncertainty analysis: waste |
Done
|
Examples of integrated assessments |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Changing ambient UVR and future melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer in London, Rome and Helsinki |
Changing ambient UVR and future future skin cancer |
Done
|
Changing ambient UVR and future skin cancer in London, Rome and Helsinki: melanoma skin cancer (CMM) |
Changing ambient UVR and future melanoma skin cancer |
Done
|
Changing ambient UVR and future skin cancer in London, Rome and Helsinki: non-melanoma skin cancer (BCC and SCC) |
Changing ambient UVR and future non-melanoma skin cancer |
Done
|
Health effects of waste management |
Health efffects of waste management |
Done
|
Integrated assessment of heavy metal releases in Europe |
Integrated assessment of heavy metal releases in Europe |
Done
|
Models and methods |
Category:IEHIAS models/methods |
Done
|
Issue framing tools |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Indicator selection: a protocol |
IEHIAS Indicator selection |
Done
|
Mind-mapping tools |
Mind-mapping tools |
Done
|
Tools for building system diagrams |
IEHIAS tools for building system diagrams |
Done
|
Collaborative assessment |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Protocol on stakeholder involvement |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Scenario modelling |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Tools for scenario construction |
IEHIAS tools for scenario construction |
Done
|
Screening tools |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Spatial analysis and visualisation |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Focal sum modelling |
Focal sum modelling in IEHIAS |
Done
|
Land use regression |
Land use regression in IEHIAS |
Done
|
Spatial visualisation toolbox |
IEHIAS spatial visualisation toolbox |
Done
|
Urban simulator - SIENA |
Urban simulator - SIENA |
Done
|
SIENA - data |
SIENA data |
Done
|
SIENA - data description |
SIENA data description |
Done
|
Population modelling |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Source apportionment models |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Chemical mass balance models |
Chemical mass balance models |
Done
|
The Chemical Mass Balance Model (EPA-CMB8) |
Not worth doing, link to http://www.epa.gov/scram001/receptor_cmb.htm |
Done
|
Positive matrix factorisation |
Positive matrix factorisation |
done
|
Principal components analysis |
Principal components analysis |
Done
|
Emission models |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Air pollution models |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
ADMS-Urban |
The Atmospheric Dispersion Model System |
Done
|
CAR-International |
The Calculation of Pollution from Road Traffic |
Donne
|
CHIMERE |
CHIMERE |
Done
|
EcoSenseWeb |
EcoSenseWeb |
Done
|
Hydrological and water quality models |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
List of hydrological and water quality models |
List of hydrological and water quality models |
Done
|
Noise models |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Electro-magnetic radiation models |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
EMF path loss models |
EMF path loss models |
Done
|
Geomorf - Geographical Model of Radio-Frequency Power Density |
Geographical Model of Radio-Frequency Power Density |
Done
|
UV radiation models |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Ultraviolet radiation models and online simulation tools |
UVR models and simulation tools |
Done
|
Micro-environmental models |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
CONTAM |
CONTAM |
Done
|
INDEX: Indoor Exposure Model |
INDEX: indoor exposure model |
Done
|
RISK IAQ model |
RISK IAQ model |
Done
|
Multi-media models |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
CalTOX |
CalTOX |
Done
|
PANGEA |
PANGEA |
Done
|
dynamiCROP |
dynamiCROP |
Done
|
Exposure, intake and dose models |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
IndusChemFate - a generic PBPK model |
IndusChemFate |
Done
|
PBPK model for cadmium |
PBPK model for cadmium |
Done
|
Physiologically based toxicokinetic (PBTK) model for dioxin |
PBTK model for dioxin |
Done
|
Exposure-response function methodology |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Exposure-response functions protocol |
Exposure-response functions protocol |
Done
|
Exposure-response functions: protocol and guidelines |
Exposure-response functions protocol |
Done
|
Impact analysis methods and tools |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Impact calculation tool |
Impact calculation tool |
Done
|
Uncertainty analysis methods and tools |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Aguila |
Aguila |
Done
|
Protocol on expert elicitation |
Protocol on expert elicitation |
Done
|
Value of information |
Value of information |
Done
|
Generic assessment tools |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Decision Support Tools metadatabase |
Decision Support Tools metadatabase |
Done
|
Monitoring methods |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Framework for Integrated Monitoring |
Category:Integrated monitoring |
Done
|
Overview of existing integrated E & H monitoring programs |
Integrated E & H monitoring programs |
Done
|
Overview of existing integrated E & H frameworks |
Integrated E & H frameworks |
Done
|
Concepts For Integrated monitoring |
Concepts for integrated monitoring |
Done
|
Conceptual framework for integrated monitoring |
Conceptual framework for integrated monitoring |
Done
|
Structural framework for integrated monitoring |
Structural framework for integrated monitoring |
Done
|
Methods for data integration |
Methods for data integration |
Done
|
Development needs for integrated monitoring |
Development needs for integrated monitoring |
Done
|
Case study PAHs in Czech Republic |
Can't do |
Done
|
Case study PCBs in Slovakia |
Can't do |
Done
|
Human biomonitoring |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Listings |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Case study summary reports |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Health impacts of agricultural land use change in Greece and Great Britain |
Health impacts of agricultural land use change |
Done
|
Health impacts of regulative policies on use of di-n-butylphthalate (DBP) in consumer products |
Health impacts of regulative policies on use of DBP in consumer products |
Done
|
Models and tools |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Worked examples of assessment techniques |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Worked examples of complete assessments |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Guidance System
|
Guidance System |
Guidance system of the IEHIAS |
Done
|
The concept |
Guidance system of the IEHIAS#The concept |
Done
|
The need for IEHIA |
Guidance system of the IEHIAS#The need for IEHIA |
Done
|
IEHIA in relation to other assessment methodologies |
Guidance system of the IEHIAS#IEHIA in relation to other assessment methodologies |
Done
|
Hazards and benefits |
Guidance system of the IEHIAS#Hazards and benefits |
Done
|
Steps in IEHIA |
Guidance system of the IEHIAS#Steps in IEHIA |
Done
|
Issue framing |
Issue framing in the IEHIAS |
Done
|
Challenges in issue framing |
Issue framing in the IEHIAS#Challenges in issue framing |
Done
|
Defining the question |
Issue framing in the IEHIAS#Defining the question |
Done
|
Who defines the question? |
Issue framing in the IEHIAS#Who defines the question? |
Done
|
What types of questions can be assessed? |
Issue framing in the IEHIAS#What types of questions can be assessed? |
Done
|
Consulting with stakeholders |
Issue framing in the IEHIAS#Consulting with stakeholders |
Done
|
Types of stakeholder |
Issue framing in the IEHIAS#Types of stakeholder |
Done
|
Engaging stakeholders |
Issue framing in the IEHIAS#Engaging stakeholders |
Done
|
Methods for stakeholder engagement |
Issue framing in the IEHIAS#Methods for stakeholder engagement |
Done
|
Open assessment |
Issue framing in the IEHIAS#Open assessment |
Done
|
Formulating scenarios |
Formulating scenarios |
Done
|
The role of scenarios |
Formulating scenarios#The role of scenarios |
Done
|
Scenarios and the causal chain |
Formulating scenarios#Scenarios and the causal chain |
Done
|
Types of scenario |
Formulating scenarios#Types of scenario |
Done
|
Prescriptive scenarios |
Prescriptive scenarios |
Done
|
Descriptive scenarios |
Descriptive scenarios |
Done
|
Predictive scenarios |
Predictive scenarios |
Done
|
Probabilistic scenarios |
Probabilistic scenarios |
Done
|
Creating scenarios for IEHIA |
Formulating scenarios#Creating scenarios for IEHIA |
Done
|
European policy scenarios |
Formulating scenarios#European policy scenarios |
Done
|
Scoping the assessment |
Scoping the assessment |
Done
|
Building a conceptual model |
Building a conceptual model |
Done
|
Setting boundaries |
Building a conceptual model#Setting boundaries |
Done
|
Guidelines on boundary setting |
Building a conceptual model#Guidelines on boundary setting |
Done
|
Mind-maps |
Building a conceptual model#Mind-maps |
Done
|
System diagrams |
Building a conceptual model#System diagrams |
Done
|
The causal chain |
IEHIAS causal chain |
Done
|
Expanding the causal chain |
IEHIAS causal chain#Expanding the causal chain |
Done
|
Customising the causal chain |
IEHIAS causal chain#Customising the causal chain |
Done
|
Other conceptual frameworks |
Other conceptual frameworks in IEHIAS |
Done
|
The DPSIR framework |
Other conceptual frameworks in IEHIAS#DPSIR |
Done
|
The DPSEEA framework |
Other conceptual frameworks in IEHIAS#DPSEEA |
Done
|
The MEME framework |
Other conceptual frameworks in IEHIAS#MEME |
Done
|
Selecting indicators |
Selecting indicators in IEHIAS |
Done
|
Types of indicator |
Selecting indicators in IEHIAS#Types of indicator |
Done
|
Position in the causal chain |
Selecting indicators in IEHIAS#Position in the causal chain |
Done
|
DALYs and QALYs |
Selecting indicators in IEHIAS#DALYs and QALYs |
Done
|
Monetary costs |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Structure |
Selecting indicators in IEHIAS#Structure |
Done
|
Perspective |
Selecting indicators in IEHIAS#Perspective |
Done
|
Building good indicators |
Selecting indicators in IEHIAS#Building good indicators |
Done
|
Key issues in design |
Design in the IEHIAS#Key issues |
Done
|
Learning from examples |
Learning from examples |
Done
|
Accuracy and uncertainty |
Accuracy and uncertainty |
Done
|
Dealing with complex exposures |
Dealing with complex exposures |
Done
|
Dealing with complex exposures: an example for water |
Dealing with complex exposures#Example for water |
Done
|
Matching exposure and health metrics |
Matching exposure and health metrics |
Done
|
Information needs |
Information needs in assessment design |
Done
|
Vulnerable and susceptible groups |
Vulnerable and susceptible groups |
Done
|
Socio-economic status |
Vulnerable and susceptible groups#Socio-economic status |
Done
|
Value systems |
Value systems |
Done
|
Geographic variation |
Geographic variation |
Done
|
Geographic location and extent |
Geographic location and extent |
Done
|
Spatial resolution |
Spatial resolution |
Done
|
Effects of spatial resolution: worked example |
Spatial resolution#Worked example |
Done
|
Zone design |
Zone design |
Done
|
Timeframe |
Timeframe in assessment design |
Done
|
Ethical issues: environmental justice |
Environmental justice |
Done
|
Lessons from INTARESE case studies |
Lessons from INTARESE case studies_0 |
Done
|
Susceptibile groups |
Susceptibile groups_0 |
Done
|
Environmental justice |
Environmental Justice_0 |
Done
|
Screening |
Screening in assessment design |
Matleena
|
Expert estimation |
Expert estimation in screening |
Matleena
|
Expert elicitation methodology |
Expert elicitation methodology |
Matleena
|
Delphi surveys |
Delphi surveys |
Matleena
|
Extrapolation |
Extrapolation |
Matleena
|
Transferring results from other studies |
Transferring results from other studies |
Matleena
|
Temporal (trend) extrapolation methods |
Temporal extrapolation methods |
Matleena
|
Spatial interpolation and extrapolation methods |
Spatial interpolation and extrapolation methods |
Matleena
|
Triangulation |
Triangulation |
Matleena
|
Rapid modelling |
Rapid modelling |
Matleena
|
Proxies |
Rapid modelling#Proxies |
Matleena
|
Proxies: the example of traffic-related air pollution |
Rapid modelling#And example of traffic-related air pollution |
Matleena
|
Analogues |
Rapid modelling#Analogues |
Matleena
|
Developing simple models |
Rapid modelling#Developing simple models |
Matleena
|
Intake fractions |
Intake fractions |
Matleena
|
Piloting |
Piloting in assessment design |
No
|
Finding and evaluating data |
|
No
|
Environmental and exposure data |
|
No
|
Representivity of environmental monitoring networks |
|
No
|
Exposure-response functions |
Exposure-response functions for IEHIAS |
No
|
Human biomonitoring data |
|
No
|
Case studies in human biomonitoring |
|
No
|
Interpreting human biomonitoring data |
|
No
|
Population, demographic and socio-economic data |
|
No
|
Health data |
|
No
|
Selecting and evaluating models |
|
No
|
Model linkage |
|
No
|
Defining and describing uncertainties |
Defining and describing uncertainties |
No
|
Framework for uncertainty classification |
Framework for uncertainty classification |
No
|
Location of uncertainty |
|
No
|
Protocol development |
Protocol development in assessment design |
No
|
Examples of assessment protocols |
|
No
|
Execution |
Execution in the IEHIAS |
Done
|
Managing the assessment |
Execution in the IEHIAS#Managing the assessment |
Done
|
Collaborating on an assessment |
Execution in the IEHIAS#Collaborating on an assessment |
Done
|
Liaising with stakeholders |
Execution in the IEHIAS#Liaising with stakeholders |
Done
|
Participating in assessment |
Execution in the IEHIAS#Participating in assessment |
Done
|
Documentation and auditing |
Execution in the IEHIAS#Documentation and auditing |
Done
|
Data management |
Execution in the IEHIAS#Data management |
Done
|
Managing uncertainties |
Execution in the IEHIAS#Managing uncertainties |
Done
|
Assessment performance |
Execution in the IEHIAS#Assessment performance |
Done
|
Modelling the causal chain |
Modelling the causal chain in IEHIAS |
Done
|
Contaminant sources |
Contaminant sources in IEHIAS |
Done
|
Characterising sources |
Contaminant sources in IEHIAS#Characterising sources |
Done
|
Data sources |
Contaminant sources in IEHIAS#Data sources |
Done
|
Source distribution |
Contaminant sources in IEHIAS#Source distribution |
Done
|
Source intensity |
Contaminant sources in IEHIAS#Source intensity |
Done
|
Modelling source activity |
Contaminant sources in IEHIAS#Modelling source activity |
Done
|
Spatial disaggregation |
Spatial disaggregation |
Done
|
Contaminant release |
Contaminant release in IEHIAS |
Done
|
Release pathways and processes |
Contaminant release in IEHIAS#Release pathways and processes |
Done
|
Release inventories |
Contaminant release in IEHIAS#Release inventories |
Done
|
Modelling contaminant releases |
Contaminant release in IEHIAS#Modelling contaminant releases |
Done
|
Development of emission scenarios |
Contaminant release in IEHIAS#Development of emission scenarios |
Done
|
Development of emission mitigation scenarios |
Contaminant release in IEHIAS#Development of emission mitigation scenarios |
Done
|
Emission factors |
Contaminant release in IEHIAS#Emission factors |
Done
|
Transport and transformation in environmental media |
|
No
|
Air pollution |
|
No
|
Atmospheric dispersion models |
|
No
|
Statistical air pollution models |
|
No
|
Indoor air pollution models |
|
No
|
Water quality |
|
No
|
Non-ionising radiation |
|
No
|
Noise |
|
No
|
GIS-based models |
|
No
|
Source attribution |
Source attribution in IEHIAS |
No
|
ExpoPlatform: Source attribution |
Not worth doing |
Done
|
Multimedia models |
|
No
|
Exposure, intake and uptake |
|
No
|
Exposure modelling |
|
No
|
Population modelling |
|
No
|
Exposure factors |
|
No
|
Intake fractions |
|
No
|
Consumer products exposure models |
|
No
|
Time micro-environment activity modelling |
|
No
|
Exposure-to-intake modelling |
|
No
|
Internal dose estimation |
|
No
|
PBPK modelling |
|
No
|
Health effects |
|
No
|
Estimating exposure-response functions |
Estimating exposure-response functions |
No
|
Estimating health effects |
|
No
|
Impact analysis |
|
No
|
Key issues in impact analysis |
|
No
|
Methods and measures for impact analysis |
|
No
|
Health-based impact measures |
|
No
|
Monetisation methods |
Monetasiation methods |
No
|
Deriving and applying monetary values |
Deriving and applying monetary values |
No
|
Deriving non-market values |
|
No
|
Discounting |
|
No
|
Value transfers |
|
No
|
Treatment of uncertainty |
|
No
|
Uncertainty analysis |
|
No
|
Framework for uncertainty classification |
|
No
|
Methods for uncertainty analysis |
|
No
|
Value of information |
|
No
|
Appraisal |
Appraisal in the IEHIAS |
Done
|
Reporting assessment results |
|
No
|
Myths in risk communication |
|
No
|
Designing effective assessment reports |
|
No
|
Indicator scorecards |
|
No
|
Mapping |
|
No
|
Effective map design |
|
No
|
Comparing and ranking outcomes |
|
No
|
Cost-effectiveness analysis |
|
No
|
Cost-benefit analysis |
|
No
|
Multi-criteria assessment |
|
No
|
Help
|
Help |
|
No
|
About the IEHIAS |
|
No
|
Structure |
|
No
|
User groups |
|
No
|
Users and permissions |
|
No
|
Editing your user account |
|
No
|
Contributing to IEHIAS |
|
No
|
Content types |
|
No
|
Where to put the contributed pages? |
|
No
|
Glossary |
|
No
|
Tutorials |
|
No
|
Tutorial: Text editor |
|
No
|
Tutorial: Using the "Read more" Style |
|
No
|
Tutorial: How to insert hyperlinks |
|
No
|
Tutorial: Creating equations |
|
No
|