Dioxins

From Opasnet
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The text on this page has been taken from an equivalent page of the IEHIAS-project. For the main article of this topic, see Dioxin.
  • A theoretical maximum of 75 polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and 135 polychlorinated dibenzofurans.
  • Dioxins are generally present as a mixture of compounds, and therefore toxicity and effects are expressed in toxic equivalency factors (TEFs).
  • The most toxic dioxin, 2,3,7,8-TCDD has a TEF value of 1 and the toxicity of all other dioxins and furans is expressed relative to this value (range: 1-0.0003).

Dioxins as a biomarker

Sample collection and storage

Matrix:

  • Adipose tissue but mainly blood and breast milk have frequently been used as matrices for dioxins
  • Expressed on a lipid basis, correlations between different tissues are generally good.

Kinetics:

  • For the general population, more than 90% of the total daily intake is derived through food
  • For different European countries, total daily intake is around 0,8-2 pg TEQ/kg body weight/day.
  • Dioxins are generally very resistant to metabolization and excretion, with half-lives of several years.

Sampling conditions:

Standard sampling methods for blood, adipose tissue or breast milk should be followed. Samples are stored at -20°C.

Sample measurement

Analytical aspects:

  • Mostly combinations of high resolution gas chromatography and mass spectroscopy (HRGC/HRMS).
  • Bio-analytical methods (in vitro and ligand binding assays) have been developed as a rapid, relatively cheap and sensitive alternatives, though they cannot replace chemical-analytical methods.
  • For milk and serum, levels of detection for individual congeners are around 0,05 pg/g lipid.

Performance characteristics:

  • For almost 20 years, WHO/EURO has been coordinating inter-laboratory quality assessment studies for dioxins in breast milk ald blood.
  • Generally good inter-laboratory comparability (relative standard deviations of 13%), though variability for individual congeners can be considerably higher.

Validation:

Analytical methods have been validated by several international agencies (e.g. USEPA, EC).

Confounding factors:

Age, food patterns, body mass index and gender can have profound effects on dioxin levels in human tissues.

Data interpretation

Concentrations reported in literature:

  • Median dioxin levels in breast milk ranged from 3,34–22,3 pg/g fat
  • Concentrations in blood are reported to be around 20-60 pg TEQ/g fat.
  • Daily intake concentrations are estimated to be around 0,8-2 pg TEQ/kg bw/day.
  • Critical total daily intake values are around 1-4 pg TEQ/kg bw/day

Dose-response/effect relationships:

  • Several dioxins are presumed to be human carcinogens, both for acute short term, and chronic long term exposure.
  • Dioxin TEQ exposures within roughly 3-fold of current background levels may be carcinogenic.
  • There are indications that in utero exposure to dioxins may result in (neuro)developmental delays, chloracne, alteration of thyroid hormone status and decreased long function.

Time trend, geographical variation, susceptibel groups:

  • Dioxin levels in breast milk are decreasing, in some countries up to 50%.
  • Global dioxin levels are highest in Western Europe highest.
  • Babies, small children, and humans exposed through diet, are the most susceptible groups.

See also

Integrated Environmental Health Impact Assessment System
IEHIAS is a website developed by two large EU-funded projects Intarese and Heimtsa. The content from the original website was moved to Opasnet.
Topic Pages
Toolkit
Data

Boundaries · Population: age+sex 100m LAU2 Totals Age and gender · ExpoPlatform · Agriculture emissions · Climate · Soil: Degredation · Atlases: Geochemical Urban · SoDa · PVGIS · CORINE 2000 · Biomarkers: AP As BPA BFRs Cd Dioxins DBPs Fluorinated surfactants Pb Organochlorine insecticides OPs Parabens Phthalates PAHs PCBs · Health: Effects Statistics · CARE · IRTAD · Functions: Impact Exposure-response · Monetary values · Morbidity · Mortality: Database

Examples and case studies Defining question: Agriculture Waste Water · Defining stakeholders: Agriculture Waste Water · Engaging stakeholders: Water · Scenarios: Agriculture Crop CAP Crop allocation Energy crop · Scenario examples: Transport Waste SRES-population UVR and Cancer
Models and methods Ind. select · Mindmap · Diagr. tools · Scen. constr. · Focal sum · Land use · Visual. toolbox · SIENA: Simulator Data Description · Mass balance · Matrix · Princ. comp. · ADMS · CAR · CHIMERE · EcoSenseWeb · H2O Quality · EMF loss · Geomorf · UVR models · INDEX · RISK IAQ · CalTOX · PANGEA · dynamiCROP · IndusChemFate · Transport · PBPK Cd · PBTK dioxin · Exp. Response · Impact calc. · Aguila · Protocol elic. · Info value · DST metadata · E & H: Monitoring Frameworks · Integrated monitoring: Concepts Framework Methods Needs
Listings Health impacts of agricultural land use change · Health impacts of regulative policies on use of DBP in consumer products
Guidance System
The concept
Issue framing Formulating scenarios · Scenarios: Prescriptive Descriptive Predictive Probabilistic · Scoping · Building a conceptual model · Causal chain · Other frameworks · Selecting indicators
Design Learning · Accuracy · Complex exposures · Matching exposure and health · Info needs · Vulnerable groups · Values · Variation · Location · Resolution · Zone design · Timeframes · Justice · Screening · Estimation · Elicitation · Delphi · Extrapolation · Transferring results · Temporal extrapolation · Spatial extrapolation · Triangulation · Rapid modelling · Intake fraction · iF reading · Piloting · Example · Piloting data · Protocol development
Execution Causal chain · Contaminant sources · Disaggregation · Contaminant release · Transport and fate · Source attribution · Multimedia models · Exposure · Exposure modelling · Intake fraction · Exposure-to-intake · Internal dose · Exposure-response · Impact analysis · Monetisation · Monetary values · Uncertainty
Appraisal