Fluorinated surfactants: Difference between revisions

From Opasnet
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Category:IEHIAS Category:Exposure Category:Biomarker :''The text on this page is taken from an equivalent page of the IEHIAS-project. *A very dive...")
 
mNo edit summary
 
Line 65: Line 65:
*Substantial increases of PFAS concentrations in the environment have been reported over the last decades.
*Substantial increases of PFAS concentrations in the environment have been reported over the last decades.
*With the voluntary production stop of PFOS, concentrations are expected to decrease in the future.
*With the voluntary production stop of PFOS, concentrations are expected to decrease in the future.
==See also==
{{IEHIAS}}

Latest revision as of 19:07, 25 September 2014

The text on this page is taken from an equivalent page of the IEHIAS-project.
  • A very diverse group, which all share an extreme persistence towards degradation.
  • Major groups are perfluoroalkylsulfonic acids (e.g. PFOS), perfluorinated carboxylic acids (e.g. PFOA) and fluorotelomers.

Fluorinated surfactants as biomarkers

Sample collection and storage

Matrix:

  • Perfluorinated alkyl substances (PFAS) are often associated with plasma albumin binding, which makes blood a suitable matrix.
  • Few studies have shown significant concentrations of PFAS in human milk
  • Cord blood may be a good indicator matrix as well.

Kinetics:

  • The major exposure pathway of PFAS in by food
  • Also exposure through inhalation of particle-bound PFAS has been observed
  • PFAS are generally very inert and not likely to degrade
  • Serum elimination half-life in occupationally exposed workers is estimated to be 8.7 years.

Sampling conditions:

  • Blood samples can be taken using standard procedures, and are stored frozen at -20°C.
  • Fluorotelomers are more volatile and need special attention.

Sample measurement

Analytical aspects:

  • Because of the ubiquitous nature of PFAS, avoiding contamination of the samples is a major challenge.
  • Analysis is usually performed using GC/MS or LC/MS techniques
  • Detection limits depend on which matrix and compound is analysed

Performance characteristics:

  • A first worldwide interlaboratory study highlighted that there are large differences in analytical performance
  • Variations are mainly due to extraction and clean-up procedures.

Validation:

No particular guidelines for PFAS analysis in human tissues are available

Confounding factors:

Only gender has been illustrated to be a confounder, with higher serum concentrations of PFOS in males.

Data interpretation

Concentrations reported in literature:

PFOS Female PFOS Male PFHxS Female PFHxS Male PFOA Female PFOA Male PFOSA Female PFOSA Male
Maximum (ng/ml) 81 72 3,3 3,4 30,9 38,1 5,8 5,8
Minimum (ng/ml) 2,5 1,3 0,2 0,2 2,4 3,5 0,7 1

Dose-response/effect relationships:

  • Most toxicological data is available for rodents,
  • Very little epidemiological data for humans is available
  • The NOAEL for males and females was considered to be around 0,03 mg/kg/day and 0,15 mg/kg/day respectively.

Time trend, geographical variation, susceptibel groups:

  • Substantial increases of PFAS concentrations in the environment have been reported over the last decades.
  • With the voluntary production stop of PFOS, concentrations are expected to decrease in the future.

See also

Integrated Environmental Health Impact Assessment System
IEHIAS is a website developed by two large EU-funded projects Intarese and Heimtsa. The content from the original website was moved to Opasnet.
Topic Pages
Toolkit
Data

Boundaries · Population: age+sex 100m LAU2 Totals Age and gender · ExpoPlatform · Agriculture emissions · Climate · Soil: Degredation · Atlases: Geochemical Urban · SoDa · PVGIS · CORINE 2000 · Biomarkers: AP As BPA BFRs Cd Dioxins DBPs Fluorinated surfactants Pb Organochlorine insecticides OPs Parabens Phthalates PAHs PCBs · Health: Effects Statistics · CARE · IRTAD · Functions: Impact Exposure-response · Monetary values · Morbidity · Mortality: Database

Examples and case studies Defining question: Agriculture Waste Water · Defining stakeholders: Agriculture Waste Water · Engaging stakeholders: Water · Scenarios: Agriculture Crop CAP Crop allocation Energy crop · Scenario examples: Transport Waste SRES-population UVR and Cancer
Models and methods Ind. select · Mindmap · Diagr. tools · Scen. constr. · Focal sum · Land use · Visual. toolbox · SIENA: Simulator Data Description · Mass balance · Matrix · Princ. comp. · ADMS · CAR · CHIMERE · EcoSenseWeb · H2O Quality · EMF loss · Geomorf · UVR models · INDEX · RISK IAQ · CalTOX · PANGEA · dynamiCROP · IndusChemFate · Transport · PBPK Cd · PBTK dioxin · Exp. Response · Impact calc. · Aguila · Protocol elic. · Info value · DST metadata · E & H: Monitoring Frameworks · Integrated monitoring: Concepts Framework Methods Needs
Listings Health impacts of agricultural land use change · Health impacts of regulative policies on use of DBP in consumer products
Guidance System
The concept
Issue framing Formulating scenarios · Scenarios: Prescriptive Descriptive Predictive Probabilistic · Scoping · Building a conceptual model · Causal chain · Other frameworks · Selecting indicators
Design Learning · Accuracy · Complex exposures · Matching exposure and health · Info needs · Vulnerable groups · Values · Variation · Location · Resolution · Zone design · Timeframes · Justice · Screening · Estimation · Elicitation · Delphi · Extrapolation · Transferring results · Temporal extrapolation · Spatial extrapolation · Triangulation · Rapid modelling · Intake fraction · iF reading · Piloting · Example · Piloting data · Protocol development
Execution Causal chain · Contaminant sources · Disaggregation · Contaminant release · Transport and fate · Source attribution · Multimedia models · Exposure · Exposure modelling · Intake fraction · Exposure-to-intake · Internal dose · Exposure-response · Impact analysis · Monetisation · Monetary values · Uncertainty
Appraisal