Expert elicitation methodology: Difference between revisions

From Opasnet
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Category:IEHIAS Category:Assessment design :''The text on this page is taken from an equivalent page of the IEHIAS-project. There are many ways to dea...")
 
No edit summary
 
Line 10: Line 10:


[[Image:expert_elicitation_protocol_steps.png]]
[[Image:expert_elicitation_protocol_steps.png]]
==References==
* Anne B Knol , Pauline Slottje, Jeroen P van der Sluijs and Erik Lebret. [http://www.ehjournal.net/content/9/1/19 The use of expert elicitation in environmental health impact assessment: a seven step procedure.] Environmental Health 2010, 9:19doi:10.1186/1476-069X-9-19


==See also==
==See also==
Line 16: Line 20:
* {{#l:Health Effects Methodology.pdf}}
* {{#l:Health Effects Methodology.pdf}}


==References==
{{IEHIAS}}
 
* Anne B Knol , Pauline Slottje, Jeroen P van der Sluijs and Erik Lebret. [http://www.ehjournal.net/content/9/1/19 The use of expert elicitation in environmental health impact assessment: a seven step procedure.] Environmental Health 2010, 9:19doi:10.1186/1476-069X-9-19

Latest revision as of 18:49, 14 October 2014

The text on this page is taken from an equivalent page of the IEHIAS-project.

There are many ways to deal with uncertainties or inadequacies in information. One of these is expert elicitation. Expert elicitation involves: “the structured questioning of experts on a subject about which knowledge in unavailable, incomplete or controversial”

Expert elicitation can be a useful means to provide a temporary summary of the limited available knowledge. This summary of knowledge can help to make decisions about how to scope an issue that is being considered for assessment, how to design the assessment (and whether or not a full assessment is warranted), to clarify and confirm assumptions or causal models, and to estimate important parameters (e.g. exposure-response functions) needed for the analysis. It can also also serve as a provisional basis for policy until further research has been carried out.

To ensure consistency, it is useful to organise expert elicitations using a clear protocol which outlines the specific steps that need to be taken. A protocol for this purpose is attached below, and the approach is summarised in the paper listed under References. This takes a deliberately broad perspective on the use of expert elicitation. The seven steps outlined in this protocol are presented in the figure below.

References

See also

Integrated Environmental Health Impact Assessment System
IEHIAS is a website developed by two large EU-funded projects Intarese and Heimtsa. The content from the original website was moved to Opasnet.
Topic Pages
Toolkit
Data

Boundaries · Population: age+sex 100m LAU2 Totals Age and gender · ExpoPlatform · Agriculture emissions · Climate · Soil: Degredation · Atlases: Geochemical Urban · SoDa · PVGIS · CORINE 2000 · Biomarkers: AP As BPA BFRs Cd Dioxins DBPs Fluorinated surfactants Pb Organochlorine insecticides OPs Parabens Phthalates PAHs PCBs · Health: Effects Statistics · CARE · IRTAD · Functions: Impact Exposure-response · Monetary values · Morbidity · Mortality: Database

Examples and case studies Defining question: Agriculture Waste Water · Defining stakeholders: Agriculture Waste Water · Engaging stakeholders: Water · Scenarios: Agriculture Crop CAP Crop allocation Energy crop · Scenario examples: Transport Waste SRES-population UVR and Cancer
Models and methods Ind. select · Mindmap · Diagr. tools · Scen. constr. · Focal sum · Land use · Visual. toolbox · SIENA: Simulator Data Description · Mass balance · Matrix · Princ. comp. · ADMS · CAR · CHIMERE · EcoSenseWeb · H2O Quality · EMF loss · Geomorf · UVR models · INDEX · RISK IAQ · CalTOX · PANGEA · dynamiCROP · IndusChemFate · Transport · PBPK Cd · PBTK dioxin · Exp. Response · Impact calc. · Aguila · Protocol elic. · Info value · DST metadata · E & H: Monitoring Frameworks · Integrated monitoring: Concepts Framework Methods Needs
Listings Health impacts of agricultural land use change · Health impacts of regulative policies on use of DBP in consumer products
Guidance System
The concept
Issue framing Formulating scenarios · Scenarios: Prescriptive Descriptive Predictive Probabilistic · Scoping · Building a conceptual model · Causal chain · Other frameworks · Selecting indicators
Design Learning · Accuracy · Complex exposures · Matching exposure and health · Info needs · Vulnerable groups · Values · Variation · Location · Resolution · Zone design · Timeframes · Justice · Screening · Estimation · Elicitation · Delphi · Extrapolation · Transferring results · Temporal extrapolation · Spatial extrapolation · Triangulation · Rapid modelling · Intake fraction · iF reading · Piloting · Example · Piloting data · Protocol development
Execution Causal chain · Contaminant sources · Disaggregation · Contaminant release · Transport and fate · Source attribution · Multimedia models · Exposure · Exposure modelling · Intake fraction · Exposure-to-intake · Internal dose · Exposure-response · Impact analysis · Monetisation · Monetary values · Uncertainty
Appraisal