IEHIAS models: example from agriculture

From Opasnet
Jump to: navigation, search
The text on this page is taken from an equivalent page of the IEHIAS-project.

As part of the EU-funded INTARESE project, which contributed to the development of this Toolbox, a case study was done to assess the health impacts of agricultural land use change in Greece and England.

This assessment comprised a prognostic analysis of the potential health effects of changes in agricultural land use. The first step involved scoping the problem in a clear and concise way. This was done through a series of consultations between the scientists involved, and with representatives from several stakeholder groups and data providers.

Initial scoping was done using mind-mapping methods. The resulting model was then refined and revised, to provide a more structured view of the problem, in the form of a systems diagram. In the process, reviews were carried out of the relevant scientific studies, to help identify which potential risk factors might be most important in affecting human health. As a consequence, three key risk factors emerged: pesticides, endotoxins and aerosols. Others that were initially considered for inclusion (e.g. health effects of nitrates) were omitted because of lack of sufficient evidence for significant health effects. In the same way, possible health outcomes of interest were defined. These focused mainly on respiratory effects (from all three agents) and cancers (from pesticide exposures).

While the resulting mind-map provided an indication of the scope of the assessment, it was not the end of the story. As part of the process of assessment design, it had to be further revised and more tightly specified to give a firm basis for assessment as reflected in the final causal diagram.

A mind-map

Mind-mapping was used to help explore the possible scope of the issues related to agriculture. Mind-mapping started by defining the key links in the causal chain (sources-impacts). Elements were then added outward by trying to define first the most immediate (proximal) factors influencing each of these links, and then progressively expanding outwards to more distal factors.

The diagram below, showing a partial mind-map of the health effects of land use change, was made with the online Bubbl-us software.


A systems diagram


Customising a causal chain

In the process, a conceptual model was built to define the system under consideration, and to highlight the elements that needed to be assessed. From an initially simple, highly structured representation of the causal chain, this gradually evolved into a more 'analytical' form, identifying the data and models that would be needed at each stage in the assessment.

The following causal diagram was created in Analytica. (Please note, this is not available as a working analytica model.) It should be compared with the more intuitive conceptual models developed using mind-mapping and system diagram methods (see links below).


See also

Integrated Environmental Health Impact Assessment System
IEHIAS is a website developed by two large EU-funded projects Intarese and Heimtsa. The content from the original website was moved to Opasnet.
Topic Pages

Boundaries · Population: age+sex 100m LAU2 Totals Age and gender · ExpoPlatform · Agriculture emissions · Climate · Soil: Degredation · Atlases: Geochemical Urban · SoDa · PVGIS · CORINE 2000 · Biomarkers: AP As BPA BFRs Cd Dioxins DBPs Fluorinated surfactants Pb Organochlorine insecticides OPs Parabens Phthalates PAHs PCBs · Health: Effects Statistics · CARE · IRTAD · Functions: Impact Exposure-response · Monetary values · Morbidity · Mortality: Database

Examples and case studies Defining question: Agriculture Waste Water · Defining stakeholders: Agriculture Waste Water · Engaging stakeholders: Water · Scenarios: Agriculture Crop CAP Crop allocation Energy crop · Scenario examples: Transport Waste SRES-population UVR and Cancer
Models and methods Ind. select · Mindmap · Diagr. tools · Scen. constr. · Focal sum · Land use · Visual. toolbox · SIENA: Simulator Data Description · Mass balance · Matrix · Princ. comp. · ADMS · CAR · CHIMERE · EcoSenseWeb · H2O Quality · EMF loss · Geomorf · UVR models · INDEX · RISK IAQ · CalTOX · PANGEA · dynamiCROP · IndusChemFate · Transport · PBPK Cd · PBTK dioxin · Exp. Response · Impact calc. · Aguila · Protocol elic. · Info value · DST metadata · E & H: Monitoring Frameworks · Integrated monitoring: Concepts Framework Methods Needs
Listings Health impacts of agricultural land use change · Health impacts of regulative policies on use of DBP in consumer products
Guidance System
The concept
Issue framing Formulating scenarios · Scenarios: Prescriptive Descriptive Predictive Probabilistic · Scoping · Building a conceptual model · Causal chain · Other frameworks · Selecting indicators
Design Learning · Accuracy · Complex exposures · Matching exposure and health · Info needs · Vulnerable groups · Values · Variation · Location · Resolution · Zone design · Timeframes · Justice · Screening · Estimation · Elicitation · Delphi · Extrapolation · Transferring results · Temporal extrapolation · Spatial extrapolation · Triangulation · Rapid modelling · Intake fraction · iF reading · Piloting · Example · Piloting data · Protocol development
Execution Causal chain · Contaminant sources · Disaggregation · Contaminant release · Transport and fate · Source attribution · Multimedia models · Exposure · Exposure modelling · Intake fraction · Exposure-to-intake · Internal dose · Exposure-response · Impact analysis · Monetisation · Monetary values · Uncertainty