Health impacts of regulative policies on use of DBP in consumer products
- The text on this page is taken from an equivalent page of the IEHIAS-project.
- 1 Scope
- 2 Assessment methods
- 3 Results
- 4 Appraisal
- 5 See also
Purpose of this assessment was to evaluate the effect of two regulative policies on the exposure levels and health risks/impacts caused by di-n-butylphthalate when using consumer products. The regulative policies in question were targeted on toys and cosmetics, which were selected as sources of exposure. In addition indoor air, indoor dust and food were considered as background sources. Exposure was aggregated from all considered sources and through different exposure routes (inhalation, ingestion and dermal). The data used represent different European countries, which provide results that are applicable to Europe in average. Sub-populations selected are young children and adult women. The most relevant health end-point for DBP and selected for this assessment is reproductive effects resulting from chronic exposure. See appended causal diagram.
Scenario(s) and type of assessment
|Type of assessment||Prognostic|
Geographical and temporal scope
|Dates/time periods||BAU situation before year 2005, policy situation after year 2006|
|Study population(s)||European population, sub-groups of young children (0-12 months) and adult women (18-80 years)|
Environmental and health factors
|Exposures/risk factors||Chronic exposure to Di-n-butylphthalate in consumer products|
|Health outcomes||Reproductive effects|
|Stakeholders||National public health agencies, consumer product safe authorities, health ministries, poison control centre, consumer product NGO’s|
|Stakeholder participation||At the screening stage of the assessment some stakeholders were contacted via e-mail asking them to list possible chemicals in consumer products that are the most interesting ones in relation to consumer exposure and health effects. Contacted stakeholders represented the following groups: Public Health Institutes, consumer product safe authorities, poison control centre|
|Exposure metrics||Intake dose of DBP as µg/kg bw/day|
|Sources and emissions|| The main data sources when defining the sources of exposure were:
|Concentrations/hazard intensity|| Concentrations from:
|Exposures|| Exposures were modelled with following procedure
Health effect assessment
|Exposure-health effect variables||
|Exposure-response functions||Not available, not appropriate|
|Impact metrics||Percentage of people exceeding tolerable daily intake (TDI) values, percentage of people exceeding derived effect level (DEL)|
|Impact assessment methods||Impact assessment was performed by comparing the percentage of people exceeding the DEL and TDI values before and after the policy measures.|
|Main sources of uncertainty||Lack of input data (amount of DBP in the sources, size of population actually using products containing DBP)|
|Methods for uncertainty analysis||Probabilistic Median latin hypercube method was used for modelling of exposures.|
Exposure assessment: The average level of the total exposure was decreased from 7.79 µg/kg bw/day to 6.77 µg/kg bw/day (15% decrease) in the group of adult women and from 7.88 µg/kg bw/day to 7.79 µg/kg bw/day (1% decrease) in the group of young children after the policy measure. Exposure levels with distribution information are presented for all sources in more detail in appended Table 1 (adult women) and in appended Table 2 (young children).
Risk assessment: The TDI is not exceeded by the average levels of exposure that have been estimated for both situations before and after the policy measure in both target groups. However, examination of the cumulative probabilities shows that around 26% of adult women population and 30% of young children population might be exposed to levels above the TDI level.
Health effect assessment: Based on the results calculated here, both target populations are below this level with average levels of exposure and it can be concluded that health effects can not be expected. Nevertheless, when examining the cumulative probabilities of the exposure estimates, it can be seen that around 9% of the adult female population and 7% of the infant population might be exposed to levels above the DEL value and may be subject to productive health effects caused by aggregate exposure to DBP.
Impact assessment: After the policy measure the percentage of adult women population exceeding TDI value was lowered from 26% to 24% and in the young children population from 30% to 29%. This indicates that the direct effect of the policy measures, specifically for DBP alone, on health risk levels was very small.
In both target groups TDI and DEL values were still exceeded after the policy measures with the highest level of exposure. The main reason for this is the fact that toys and cosmetics are not the main sources contributing to the exposure of DBP, it is food. The main dietary contribution is estimated to be root crops and leaf crops. DBP present in food is coming from DBP as an environmental contaminant, but might also result from the use of DBP in food and water contact materials. Policy measures that have more effect to the production amount of DBP and as consequence lower the environmental concentrations of DBP or policy measures that lower the concentrations of DBP in food packaging materials might result in a more noticeable decrease of human exposure levels than the policy measures considered here.
The main limitations of this study are 1) Only repeated (chronic) exposure is considered, 2) only women and very young (0-12 month) children are considered, because they are assumed to have the highest exposures from cosmetics and toys, and 3) the possible effect of the use of alternatives (with their possible own adverse health effects) is not taken into account. However, this assessment provides some new aspects compared to previous risk assessments performed at European level. The main advantage is the use of aggregate exposure, providing more realistic exposure values. Furthermore, in previous risk assessments, exposure from cosmetics has been evaluated only for one or two products, whereas much more products have been taken into account in this case study. Another advantage of this approach is that it allows the comparison of different sources of exposure and in this case, it showed that food was the main contributor in the exposure profiles and that future policy measures may need to be focused on this source of exposure in order to limit the exposure of the populations to DBP.