Land use in Urgenche: Difference between revisions
Azin m7777 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Azin m7777 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
For some city such as Kuopio (Finland), Suzhou (China), Xi’an (China) the Google map was not differentiating between the lands. Furthermore using Google map and checking each city without any particular software may be is not so precise. | For some city such as Kuopio (Finland), Suzhou (China), Xi’an (China) the Google map was not differentiating between the lands. Furthermore using Google map and checking each city without any particular software may be is not so precise. | ||
At the moment looking for kind of software to detect the green area, building and water will be helpful. | At the moment looking for kind of software to detect the green area, building and water will be helpful. | ||
Checking map information form different websites like infokartta might be useful as well. | |||
{| {{prettytable}} | {| {{prettytable}} | ||
Revision as of 18:07, 27 June 2012
| Moderator:Azin M (see all) |
| This page is a stub. You may improve it into a full page. |
| Upload data
|
Land use in Urgenche which is contains 6 different cities such as
- Suzhou, China
- Xi’an, China
- Basel, Switzerland
- Kuopio, Finland
- Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Stuttgart, Germany
- Thessaloniki, Greece
Question
Developing the criteria for the land use in Urgenche cities?
Answer
|
Information on land use (m2)
|
Information on building stock (% of floor area)
|
Other data
|
Possible indoor environment quality (IEQ)indicators (%)
|
For developing the criteria for the land use, we decided to pick up 100 points as a random sampling from different cities in the Urgenche project. As we have seven cities in this project. We agreed to evaluate 14 check points from each city. One of the challenges was to find high resolution map. Though Google map is providing very valuable information but in some cases is not enough. The other challenges were from where to find out the actual boundary of each city. In the Google map there is slight differentiation between each city with pink boundary. However in one city (Kuopio) is not visible. For Kuopio, we had some difficultly such as the Google map was not visible enough. So we used another data base system such as Karttapaikka website. Also we do not have actual boundary of Kuopio. To overcome the city Boundary of Kuopio we agreed to define some points as far as we got the actual boundary of Kuopio.
For some city such as Kuopio (Finland), Suzhou (China), Xi’an (China) the Google map was not differentiating between the lands. Furthermore using Google map and checking each city without any particular software may be is not so precise. At the moment looking for kind of software to detect the green area, building and water will be helpful. Checking map information form different websites like infokartta might be useful as well.
| Obs | City | Green area | Building area | Block of flats | Row house | Office | Industry | Detached house | Asphalt/paved area | Water area | Public, shops | Other land area |
| 1 | Kuopio | 10% | 50% | 10% | 5% | 20% | 5% | |||||
| 2 | Kuopio | 50% | 20% | 2% | 20% | 8% | ||||||
| 3 | Kuopio | 25% | 5% | 40% | 10% | 15% | 5% | |||||
| 4 | Kuopio | 30% | 30% | 19% | 20% | 1% | ||||||
| 5 | Kuopio | 20% | 60% | 20% | ||||||||
| 6 | Kuopio | 50% | 30% | 10% | 10% | |||||||
| 7 | Kuopio | 50% | 40% | 10% | ||||||||
| 8 | Kuopio | 70% | 10% | 10% | 10% | |||||||
| 9 | Kuopio | 40% | 15% | 10% | 5% | 30% | ||||||
| 10 | [ Kuopio] | |||||||||||
| 11 | [ Kuopio] | |||||||||||
| 12 | [ Kuopio] | |||||||||||
| 13 | [ Kuopio] | |||||||||||
| 14 | [ Kuopio] | |||||||||||
| 15 | Stuttgart | 8% | 70% | 5% | 17% | |||||||
| 16 | Stuttgart | 10% | 70% | 15% | 5% | |||||||
| 17 | Stuttgart | 9% | 70% | 1% | 20% | |||||||
| 18 | Stuttgart | 10% | 60% | 5% | 10% | 10% | 5% | |||||
| 19 | Stuttgart | 50% | 5% | 5% | 40% | |||||||
| 20 | Stuttgart | 45% | 30% | 5% | 10% | 10% | ||||||
| 21 | Stuttgart | 85% | 7% | 3% | 5% | |||||||
| 22 | Stuttgart | 60% | 25% | 2% | 3% | 10% | ||||||
| 23 | Stuttgart | 20% | 60% | 10% | 5% | 5% | ||||||
| 24 | Stuttgart | 5% | 37% | 20% | 3% | 30% | 5% | |||||
| 25 | Stuttgart | 20% | 50% | 10% | 5% | 10% | 5% | |||||
| 26 | Stuttgart | 30% | 40% | 15% | 5% | 10% | ||||||
| 27 | Stuttgart | 10% | 50% | 10% | 10% | 10% | 10% | |||||
| 28 | Stuttgart | 35% | 40% | 10% | 10% | 5% | ||||||
| 29 | Basel | 5% | 45% | 3% | 42% | 5% | ||||||
| 30 | Basel | 80% | 15% | 5% | ||||||||
| 31 | Basel | 5% | 5% | 70% | 10% | 10% | ||||||
| 32 | Basel | 15% | 20% | 35% | 10% | 20% | ||||||
| 33 | Basel | 5% | 30% | 25% | 20% | 20% | ||||||
| 34 | Basel | 30% | 5% | 50% | 15% | |||||||
| 35 | Basel | 10% | 15% | 10% | 5% | 10% | 50% | |||||
| 36 | Basel | 30% | 15% | 40% | 15% | |||||||
| 37 | Basel | 30% | 40% | 20% | 10% | |||||||
| 38 | Basel | 30% | 40% | 10% | 10% | 10% | ||||||
| 39 | Basel | 40% | 5% | 45% | 10% | |||||||
| 40 | Basel | 5% | 60% | 15% | 20% | |||||||
| 41 | Basel | 30% | 50% | 10% | 10% | |||||||
| 42 | Basel | 10% | 20% | 40% | 30% | |||||||
| 43 | Basel | 30% | 10% | 20% | 40% | |||||||
| 44 | Rotterdam | 20% | 50% | 20% | 10% | |||||||
| 45 | Rotterdam | 60% | 5% | 30% | 5% | |||||||
| 46 | Rotterdam | 40% | 45% | 5% | 10% | |||||||
| 47 | Rotterdam | 40% | 40% | 5% | 10% | 5% | ||||||
| 48 | Rotterdam | 20% | 45% | 10% | 15% | 10% | ||||||
| 49 | Rotterdam | 15% | 40% | 10% | 15% | 20% | ||||||
| 50 | Rotterdam | 40% | 35% | 5% | 10% | 5% | 5% | |||||
| 51 | Rotterdam | 100% | ||||||||||
| 52 | Rotterdam | 15% | 50% | 20% | 10% | 5% | ||||||
| 53 | Rotterdam | 50% | 15% | 35% | ||||||||
| 54 | Rotterdam | 25% | 40% | 20% | 15% | |||||||
| 55 | Rotterdam | 10% | 65% | 10% | 10% | 5% | ||||||
| 56 | Rotterdam | 40% | 15% | 5% | 40% | |||||||
| 57 | Rotterdam | 10% | 35% | 20% | 30% | 5% | ||||||
| 58 | Thessaloniki | 10% | 65% | 5% | 10% | 10% | ||||||
| 59 | Thessaloniki | 10% | 10% | 50% | 20% | 10% | ||||||
| 60 | Thessaloniki | 5% | 20% | 10% | 65% | |||||||
| 61 | Thessaloniki | 5% | 5% | 10% | 10% | 5% | 65% | |||||
| 62 | [1] | 30% | 10% | 20% | 40% | |||||||
| 63 | Thessaloniki | 5% | 10% | 65% | 20% | |||||||
| 64 | Thessaloniki | 10% | 35% | 40% | 10% | 5% | ||||||
| 65 | Thessaloniki | 5% | 55% | 20% | 20% | |||||||
| 66 | Thessaloniki | 10% | 80% | 10% | ||||||||
| 67 | Thessaloniki | 5% | 20% | 50% | 20% | 5% | ||||||
| 68 | Thessaloniki | 35% | 20% | 20% | 15% | 10% | ||||||
| 69 | Thessaloniki | 5% | 15% | 60% | 20% | |||||||
| 70 | Thessaloniki | 10% | 10% | 60% | 20% | |||||||
| 71 | Thessaloniki | 15% | 15% | 50% | 20% | |||||||
| 72 | Xi'an | 15% | 10% | 50% | 15% | 10% | ||||||
| 73 | Xi'an | 5% | 10% | 75% | 10% | |||||||
| 74 | Xi'an | 60% | 40% | |||||||||
| 75 | Xi'an | 40% | 30% | 30% | ||||||||
| 76 | Xi'an | 90% | 10% | |||||||||
| 77 | Xi'an | 85% | 15% | |||||||||
| 78 | Xi'an | 95% | 5% | |||||||||
| 79 | Xi'an | 100% | ||||||||||
| 80 | Xi'an | 100% | ||||||||||
| 81 | Xi'an | 50% | 50% | |||||||||
| 82 | Xi'an | 95% | 5% | |||||||||
| 83 | Xi'an | 100% | ||||||||||
| 84 | Xi'an | 100% | ||||||||||
| 86 | Xi'an | 30% | 30% | 40% | ||||||||
| 87 | Suzhou | 10% | 70% | 15% | 5% | |||||||
| 88 | Suzhou | 50% | 25% | 10% | 5% | 10% | ||||||
| 89 | Suzhou | 70% | 20% | 10% | ||||||||
| 90 | Suzhou | 90% | 10% | |||||||||
| 91 | Suzhou | 40% | 60% | |||||||||
| 92 | Suzhou | 80% | 5% | 5% | 5% | 5% | ||||||
| 93 | Suzhou | 5% | 5% | 40% | 40% | 10% | ||||||
| 94 | Suzhou | 45% | 5% | 5% | 45% | |||||||
| 95 | Suzhou | 60% | 20% | 10% | 10% | |||||||
| 96 | Suzhou | 20% | 20% | 50% | 10% | |||||||
| 97 | Suzhou | 20% | 20% | 20% | 40% | |||||||
| 98 | Suzhou | 10% | 5% | 5% | 20% | 60% | ||||||
| 99 | Suzhou | 60% | 20% | 5% | 15% | |||||||
| 100 | Suzhou | 70% | 10% | 10% | 10% |
Rationale
Dependencies
Formula
See also
Keywords
References
Related files
<mfanonymousfilelist></mfanonymousfilelist>