Template:Peer review
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This page has been peer reviewed. The page belongs to class Not defined. The amount of respect is not defined.
Reviewers: Anonymous |
The basis for the review is the quality and applicability of content for a potential reader. The target population may be different for different classes. See possible classes and typical respects. |
This template is used on the talk page to show a brief evaluation of the peer review. There is no template for the full peer review. Instead, use the normal templates for discussion, located under the subtitle Peer review.
The parameters:
- reviewers: user name(s) of the reviewer(s) (as [[User:Name|]] links)
- class: To which page class this page belongs.
- respect: How many onors is given by the reviewers to one event of reading the page. See typical number of onors for different page types.
- evaluation: A brief summary of the main points of the review.
- version: a permanent link to the page version that was reviewed.
Note:
- A previous way to link to the reviewed version: [{{fullurl:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|oldid={{{oldid}}}}}]
- The following templates were merged to Template:Peer review: Template:Review | Template:Quality assessment | Template:Self-evaluation | Template:Quality assessment box
The following text can be copied to the place where you want the review box to show up (typically to the Talk page under a subheading "Peer review"):
{{Peer review |reviewers = ~~~~ |class = See possible classes from Category:Quality of an object |respect = Replace this text with the amount of [[onor]]s you want to give to the page. |evaluation = Replace this text with the list of topics and their evaluations (;Topic: Evaluation). |version = Replace this text with the permanent link of the reviewed version. }}