Talk:PM2.5 concentration from bus traffic in Helsinki in 2020
Contents
Formula not self-explanatory -- Jouni 13:22, 21 February 2008 (EET)
----#1:: . The formula is not self-explanatory. The abbreviations should be explained. If the formula does not contain all details, there should be a link to e.g. a model that the user can access and evaluate. --Jouni 13:22, 21 February 2008 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: comment)
Re: Formula not self-explanatory -- Jgrellier 13:46, 21 February 2008 (EET)
----#4:: . Done - terms in formulae explained --Jgrellier 13:46, 21 February 2008 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: comment)
Units in formula not clear -- Jgrellier 13:49, 21 February 2008 (EET)
----#(2):: . The units for the variable are not clearly the result of the inputs or the formula. Each term in the formula should have its units listed. --Jgrellier 13:49, 21 February 2008 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: comment)
----#(3):: . Agreed, including the units in the formula allows you to check the coherence of the formula --Miranda (type: truth; paradigms: science: comment)
----#(4):: . Done --Jgrellier 14:16, 21 February 2008 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: comment)
Result missing
----#5:: . The result should contain the actual distributions (or descriptive statistic such as mean, SD, and a few fractiles. --Jouni 14:01, 21 February 2008 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: comment)
