Drinking water treatment efficiency
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Moderator:Heta (see all) |
|
Upload data
|
Question
How efficient is microbiological treatment (reported as log-decrease) as used in most common Finnish water treatment processes?
Answer
Rationale
Data
Water treatment method | Pathogen | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Campylobacteri | E.coli O157:H7 | Rotavirus | Norovirus | Sapovirus | Cryptosporidium | Giardia | |
Coagulation and flotation | [1] | [1] | [1] | [1] | [1] | [1] | |
Slow sand filtration | [2] | ||||||
Limestone filtration | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Active carbon filtration | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | [3] | [3] |
Water treatment processes
Coagulation/Flotation |
Coagulation works well |
Enhanced coagulation |
Sand filtration |
Limestone filtration |
Active carbon filtration |
Obs | TreatmentMethod | Pathogen | Unit | Result |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Coagulation and flotation | campylobacter | Logdecrease | 1.5(0.6-3.7) |
2 | Coagulation and flotation | E.coli O157:H7 | Logdecrease | 2.46(1.88-3.14) |
3 | Coagulation and flotation | rotavirus | Logdecrease | 3.99(2.57-5.19) |
4 | Coagulation and flotation | norovirus | Logdecrease | 3.99(2.57-5.19) |
5 | Coagulation and flotation | sapovirus | Logdecrease | 3.99(2.57-5.19) |
6 | Coagulation and flotation | cryptosporidium | Logdecrease | 1.5(0.6-3.7) |
7 | Coagulation and flotation | giardia | Logdecrease | 3.4 |
8 | Slow sand filtration | campylobacter | Logdecrease | 2.7 |
9 | Slow sand filtration | E.coli O157:H7 | Logdecrease | 2.7 |
10 | Slow sand filtration | rotavirus | Logdecrease | 2.2 |
11 | Slow sand filtration | norovirus | Logdecrease | 2.2 |
12 | Slow sand filtration | sapovirus | Logdecrease | 2.2 |
13 | Slow sand filtration | cryptosporidium | Logdecrease | 4.8 |
14 | Slow sand filtration | giardia | Logdecrease | 4.9 |
15 | Limestone filtration | campylobacter | Logdecrease | 0 |
16 | Limestone filtration | E.coli O157:H7 | Logdecrease | 0 |
17 | Limestone filtration | rotavirus | Logdecrease | 0 |
18 | Limestone filtration | norovirus | Logdecrease | 0 |
19 | Limestone filtration | sapovirus | Logdecrease | 0 |
20 | Limestone filtration | cryptosporidium | Logdecrease | 0 |
21 | Limestone filtration | giardia | Logdecrease | 0 |
22 | Active carbon filtration | campylobacter | Logdecrease | 0 |
23 | Active carbon filtration | E.coli O157:H7 | Logdecrease | 0 |
24 | Active carbon filtration | rotavirus | Logdecrease | 0 |
25 | Active carbon filtration | norovirus | Logdecrease | 0 |
26 | Active carbon filtration | sapovirus | Logdecrease | 0 |
27 | Active carbon filtration | cryptosporidium | Logdecrease | 1.1 |
28 | Active carbon filtration | giardia | Logdecrease | 2 |
29 | None | campylobacter | Logdecrease | 0 |
30 | None | E.coli O157:H7 | Logdecrease | 0 |
31 | None | rotavirus | Logdecrease | 0 |
32 | None | norovirus | Logdecrease | 0 |
33 | None | sapovirus | Logdecrease | 0 |
34 | None | cryptosporidium | Logdecrease | 0 |
35 | None | giardia | Logdecrease | 0 |
Calculations
Saves the data on the page
Cuts the data form the page to only include chosen treatment methods.
See also
- Water guide
- http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/dwq/en/watreatpath2.pdf
- heande:Polaris:Vedenkäsittelyn tehokkuus/Mikkeli
- heande:Polaris:Vedenkäsittelyn tehokkuus/Lahti
- heande:Polaris:Vedenkäsittelyn tehokkuus/Kirkkonummi
- Health impacts of waterborne microbes
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 Anna-Maria Hokajärvi, Tarja Pitkänen, Päivi Meriläinen, Ari Kauppinen, Ville Matikka, Sara Kovanen, Asko Vepsäläinen and Ilkka T. Miettinen 2018. Determination of Removal Efficiencies forEscherichia coli, Clostridial Spores, and F-SpecificColiphages in Unit Processes of Surface Waterworksfor QMRA Applications. Water 2018, 10(11), 1525 [1]
- ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; no text was provided for refs namedhijnen
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Hijnen, W. A., Suylen, G. M. H., Bahlman, J. A., Brouwer‐Hanzens, A. and Medema, G. J. (2010). "GAC adsorption filters as barriers for viruses, bacteria and protozoan (oo)cysts in water treatment." Water research 44: 1224‐123