BIOHER assessment
Moderator:Pauliina (see all) |
|
Upload data
|
This assessment calls for new participants to work on this important topic. |
---|
Opasnet is a web-workspace for improving decision-making by collecting and distributing important knowledge. It is based on the work by a large group of interested and active volunteers who want to make a difference.
If you are interested, please add your username under the Participants heading. Make also sure that My preferences of your account contain a valid email address for you, so that other Opasnet users can contact you (the email is not disclosed to other users). |
Health and climate impacts of heat production in small municipalities (BIOHER)
This is assessment page of Bioher. Bioher is a research project coordinated by National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL). The duration is 2008-2011. Project includes five subprojects with 1) measurement of PM and greenhouse gas emissions, 2) chemical characterization and assessment of atmospheric thermal impact of emitted PM, 3) toxicological characterization of emitted PM, 4) assessment of exposure to and health effects of current residential wood combustion, 5) assessment of health risks.
Main study questions are:
- How human risks differs between four heating scenarios/decisions?
- What are the costs of emissions and health effects due to different heating scenarios/decisions?
- What are climate change impacts of PM emissions and health effects due to CC?
Scope
Purpose
The purpose is to evaluate PM2.5 and green house gas (GHG) emissions of detached houses and small heating power plant, to assess exposure and health effects due to evaluated emissions and to define emission, heating and health effect costs. Assessment is going to compare four alternative ways to arrange decentralized energy production in communities with 2000 - 10000 inhabitants: light oil and pellets as fuel of detached houses and heavy oil and wood chips as fuel of small heating plants. In addition, environmental effects i.e. climate change (CC) of PM2.5 and GHG emissions is assessed with this model.
Questions:
- What would be the health effects of PM2.5 emissions of small power plant and individual houses in small living area (2000- 10000 inh.)?
- What are GHG emissions of individual houses and small power plant and how emissions effect on CC?
- What are the costs of different alternatives?
- What is the optimal decision to produce energy and heat to houses?
Boundaries
- Energy production (single house and small energy plant level, 1-20MW)
- Population (2000-10000 inh.)
- Exposure for PM2.5
- ER-functions for PM2.5
- PM2.5 emissions (->health effects)
- PM2.5 climate effect (-> health effects)
- Household heating scenarios:
- Light oil and pellets
- Small heating plant scenarios:
- Heavy oil and wood chips
- Atmospheric thermal impact
- DALY
- Impacts:
- Climate change
- Premature mortality
- Costs
Scenarios
Scenarios include two different fuel types of energy production in detached houses and small power plant:
Detached houses
- light oil
- Pellets
Small power plant
- Heavy oil
- Wood chips
Intended users
- City-level policy-makers in all sectors in Kuopio as well as everywhere else
- International policy-makers related climate change
- Policy-makers related health risks of fine particles and green house gases
- General public
- Scientists working on health risks of fine particles, green house gases and climate change
- Other interested of topic
Participants
- Assessment and Modelling Unit of THL: Virpi Kollanus, Pauliina, Marko, Mikko Pohjola, Jouni
- Other researchers related Bioher -project
Variables
- Heating systems in buildings in Finland
- Heating consumption of buildings
- Energy efficiency of buildings in Finland
- Emission factors for burning processes
- ERF of PM2.5 on mortality in general population
- Prices of fuels in heat production
Other variables in the scale of Finland
Emissions in Finland:
- PM2.5 emissions from house stock heating in Finland
- CO2 emissions from house stock heating in Finland
- CH4 emissions from house stock heating in Finland
- N2O emissions from house stock heating in Finland
- GHG emissions from land use change
Exposure in Finland:
- PM2.5 concentration in Finland
- Exposure of Finnish subpopulations to fine particles due domestic wood combustion
- Intake fraction
- Breathing rate
- Exposure to PM2.5 in Finland
Conclusions
Analyses
- Cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analyses
- value-of-information (VOI) analysis
See also
- Internal project website in ERACintra
- CLAIH assessment
- Bioher stakeholder meeting 2009
- Assessment on impacts of emission trading on city-level (ET-CL)
- Pientaloalueiden ja -taajamien kaukolämpöön liittämisen kriteerit
- Rakennetun ympäristön energiankäyttö ja kasvihuonekaasupäästöt
- HSY2003:Pienpoltto pääkaupunkiseudulla
- Parhaan käyttökelpoisen tekniikan huomioonottaminen ympäristölupamenettelyssä (esimerkkinä alle 50MWn polttolaitokset)
- Paras käytettävissä oleva tekniikka (BAT) 5-50 MW:n polttolaitoksissa Suomessa (luvut1-7) Tästä löytyy ominaispäästökertoimet ja hyötysuhteet polttoaineittain ja polttotekniikoittain pienissä polttolaitoksissa (esim. taulukko 4). Myös tieto kuinka paljon pieniä polttolaitoksia on Suomessa.
- Paras käytettävissä oleva tekniikka (BAT) 5-50 MW:n polttolaitoksissa Suomessa (luvut8-19)Täältä löytyy tietoa mm. hiukkasten poistotavoista (taulukko 23).
- Heljo et al. Rakennusten energian kulutus ja CO2-ekv päästöt Suomessa
- Heljo et al. Sähkölämmitys ja lämpöpumput sähkönkäyttäjinä ja päästöjen aiheuttajina Suomessa
costs and future:
- Vehviläinen etal. Lämmön ja sähkön yhteistuotannon potentiaali sekä kaukolämmityksen ja -jäähdytyksen tulevaisuus Suomessa
- Teknologiaohjelma DENSY – Hajautetun energiantuotannon tulevaisuusskenaariot ja vaikutukset liiketoimintamalleihin
- Pientaloalueen lämmityskärjestelmien vertailusis.mm. kustannuslaskentaa
- Kaukolämmityksen asiakasrajapinnan teknis-taloudelliset reunaehdot sis.mm.Kaukolämpöliittymien kustannusselvitys
- KAUKOLÄMMITYKSEN ASIAKASRAJAPINNAN TEKNIS‐TALOUDELLISET REUNAEHDOT TUTKIMUKSEN LOPPURAPORTTIsis. mm. kaukolämpöliittymän kustannusselvityksen
- Pienten (<4 MW) CHP-laitosten mahdollisuudet