GOHERR assessment: Difference between revisions

From Opasnet
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{bluebox|1=For guidance about the contents, see page Assessment. * Put your own username in moderator=Username unless someone else takes care of the page content....")
 
(content added based on DoW)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{bluebox|1=For guidance about the contents, see page [[Assessment]].
[[Category:Herring]]  
*        Put your own username in moderator=Username unless someone else takes care of the page content.
{{assessment|moderator=Päivi Haapasaari|stub=Yes|ongoing=Yes}}
*        Add at least category using the <nowiki>[[Category:Name of category]]</nowiki> tag.
*        When the page is quite developed, change stub=No
 
This box of text can removed.
}}
 
[[Category:ADD A CATEGORY]]  
{{assessment|moderator=ADD YOUR USERNAME|stub=Yes}}


== Scope ==
== Scope ==
Line 18: Line 10:
=== Participants ===
=== Participants ===


* University of Helsinki: Sakari Kuikka, Päivi Haapasaari, Kirsi Hoviniemi
* National Institute for Health and Welfare: Jouni Tuomisto, Arja Asikainen
* University of Oulu: Timo P. Karjalainen, Simo Sarkki, Mia Pihlajamäki
* SLU: Anna Gårdmark, Jonas
* Alyne Delaney
* Stakeholders needed in the assessment: fisher's associations, agricultural/fisheries ministries in Finland, Sweden, Estonia, Denmark.


=== Boundaries ===
=== Boundaries ===
* Time considered: 2015 - 2040.
* Area considered: The whole Baltic Sea. For detailed herring/salmon stock modelling, only the Bothnian Sea and Gulf of Bothnia is considered.
* Policies considered: We will build and explore four integrative scenarios for the future of Baltic salmon and herring
* Outcomes considered: threats to and state of the fish stocks; impacts and governance responses


=== Decisions and scenarios ===
=== Decisions and scenarios ===
* Scenarios (possible internally coherent paths in the future) will be developed about 1) eutrophication, 2) dioxin releases, 3) the use of Baltic herring, and 4) salmon policy, by taking into account different political, economic, social, technical, climate change-related etc. circumstances.
** Scenario for eutrophication
** Scenario for herring use {{comment|# |How do we differentiate herring use scenario and herring policies?|--[[User:Jouni|Jouni]] ([[User talk:Jouni|talk]]) 06:54, 22 April 2015 (UTC)}}
** Scenario for salmon policy
** Scenario for dioxin input to the Baltic Sea
* Salmon management
** International agreement on fishing quota for salmon
* Herring management
** Size-selective fishing of herring
* Knowledge actions and fish recommendations
* Agricultural policy
* Dioxin policy
* Etc


=== Timing ===
=== Timing ===
The assessment started in April 2015. The first stakeholder meeting will be in February 2016. The final results with the full decision support tool will be finalised in March 2018.


== Answer ==
== Answer ==
The work has just started. There is no answer yet.


=== Results ===
=== Results ===
Line 33: Line 54:
== Rationale ==
== Rationale ==


Upload a causal diagram and change the right name here.
[[File:Goherr decision support tool diagram.png|thumb|300px|Goherr causal diagram]]


[[image:Causal diagram.PNG|thumb|Add a legend for your diagram.]]
=== Stakeholders ===


=== Stakeholders ===
Who will be affected by the decisions?
* Professional fishers
* Anglers and other recreational fishers.
* Food and fish industry.
* Mink and fox farmers in Finland.
* All people utilising recreational values of the Baltic Sea (relates to eutrophication)


=== Dependencies ===
=== Dependencies ===
* Eutrophication of the Baltic Sea
* Herring fishers' commitment to the fishing restrictions
* Herring population
* Herring catch
* Dioxin levels in herring
* Salmon population
* Salmon catch
* Dioxin levels in salmon
* Consumers' behavour
Outcomes of intrest:
* Sustainability of salmon catch
* Sustainability of herring catch
* Human health (health impacts of healty fish and harmful pollutants, especially dioxin)
* Social utility {{comment|# |This must be specified!|--[[User:Jouni|Jouni]] ([[User talk:Jouni|talk]]) 06:54, 22 April 2015 (UTC)}}


=== Analyses ===
=== Analyses ===
Line 48: Line 90:


== See also ==
== See also ==
{{goherr}}


== Keywords ==
== Keywords ==

Revision as of 06:54, 22 April 2015



Scope

Question

Intended use and users

Participants

  • University of Helsinki: Sakari Kuikka, Päivi Haapasaari, Kirsi Hoviniemi
  • National Institute for Health and Welfare: Jouni Tuomisto, Arja Asikainen
  • University of Oulu: Timo P. Karjalainen, Simo Sarkki, Mia Pihlajamäki
  • SLU: Anna Gårdmark, Jonas
  • Alyne Delaney
  • Stakeholders needed in the assessment: fisher's associations, agricultural/fisheries ministries in Finland, Sweden, Estonia, Denmark.

Boundaries

  • Time considered: 2015 - 2040.
  • Area considered: The whole Baltic Sea. For detailed herring/salmon stock modelling, only the Bothnian Sea and Gulf of Bothnia is considered.
  • Policies considered: We will build and explore four integrative scenarios for the future of Baltic salmon and herring
  • Outcomes considered: threats to and state of the fish stocks; impacts and governance responses

Decisions and scenarios

  • Scenarios (possible internally coherent paths in the future) will be developed about 1) eutrophication, 2) dioxin releases, 3) the use of Baltic herring, and 4) salmon policy, by taking into account different political, economic, social, technical, climate change-related etc. circumstances.
    • Scenario for eutrophication
    • Scenario for herring use ----#: . How do we differentiate herring use scenario and herring policies? --Jouni (talk) 06:54, 22 April 2015 (UTC) (type: truth; paradigms: science: comment)
    • Scenario for salmon policy
    • Scenario for dioxin input to the Baltic Sea
  • Salmon management
    • International agreement on fishing quota for salmon
  • Herring management
    • Size-selective fishing of herring
  • Knowledge actions and fish recommendations
  • Agricultural policy
  • Dioxin policy
  • Etc

Timing

The assessment started in April 2015. The first stakeholder meeting will be in February 2016. The final results with the full decision support tool will be finalised in March 2018.

Answer

The work has just started. There is no answer yet.

Results

Conclusions

Rationale

Goherr causal diagram

Stakeholders

Who will be affected by the decisions?

  • Professional fishers
  • Anglers and other recreational fishers.
  • Food and fish industry.
  • Mink and fox farmers in Finland.
  • All people utilising recreational values of the Baltic Sea (relates to eutrophication)

Dependencies

  • Eutrophication of the Baltic Sea
  • Herring fishers' commitment to the fishing restrictions
  • Herring population
  • Herring catch
  • Dioxin levels in herring
  • Salmon population
  • Salmon catch
  • Dioxin levels in salmon
  • Consumers' behavour

Outcomes of intrest:

  • Sustainability of salmon catch
  • Sustainability of herring catch
  • Human health (health impacts of healty fish and harmful pollutants, especially dioxin)
  • Social utility ----#: . This must be specified! --Jouni (talk) 06:54, 22 April 2015 (UTC) (type: truth; paradigms: science: comment)

Analyses

Indices

Calculations

See also

Goherr Research project 2015-2018: Integrated governance of Baltic herring and salmon stocks involving stakeholders

Goherr public website

Workpackages

WP1 Management · WP2 Sociocultural use, value and goverrnance of Baltic salmon and herring · WP3 Scenarios and management objectives · WP4 Linking fish physiology to food production and bioaccumulation of dioxin · WP5 Linking the health of the Baltic Sea with health of humans: Dioxin · WP6 Building a decision support model for integrated governance · WP7 Dissemination

Other pages in Opasnet

GOHERR assessment · Goherr flyer · Goherr scenarios · Relevant literature: policy · dioxins · values

Data

Exposure- response functions of dioxins · Fish consumption in Sweden · POP concentrations in Baltic sea fish · Exposure-response functions of Omega3 fatty acids

Methods Health impact assessment · OpasnetBaseUtils‎ · Modelling in Opasnet
Other assessments Benefit-risk assessment of Baltic herring · Benefit-risk assessment on farmed salmon · Benefit-risk assessment of methyl mercury and omega-3 fatty acids in fish · Benefit-risk assessment of fish consumption for Beneris · Benefit-risk assessment of Baltic herring (in Finnish)

http://www.bonusportal.org/ http://www.bonusprojects.org/bonusprojects

Keywords

References


Related files

Retrieved from "https://en.opasnet.org/index.php?title=GOHERR_assessment&oldid=35563"