ERF of indoor dampness on respiratory health effects: Difference between revisions

From Opasnet
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 103: Line 103:
=== Dependencies ===
=== Dependencies ===


=== Unit ===
=== Unit === {{attack|# |Unit is not a part of Rationale, it could be added to the data table.|--[[User:Isabell Rumrich|Isabell Rumrich]] 10:37, 4 February 2013 (EET)}}


[[OR]] per yes/no visible dampness and/or mold or mold odor
[[OR]] per yes/no visible dampness and/or mold or mold odor

Revision as of 08:37, 4 February 2013



Question

What is the association between exposure to indoor dampness and mould in homes and respiratory health effects? ←--#: . The question is clear. --Isabell Rumrich 10:27, 4 February 2013 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence)

Answer

Exposure-response function

ERF of indoor dampness on respiratory health effects: Difference between revisions(OR per yes/no visible dampness and/or mold or mold odor)
ObsDiseaseResponse metricSubjectsExposure routeExposure metricExposure unitERF parameterThresholdERFDescription
1Upper respiratory tract symptomsAllInhalationvisible dampness and/or mold or mold odoryes/noOR01.701.70 (1.44-2.00), No. studies: 13
2CoughAllInhalationvisible dampness and/or mold or mold odoryes/noOR01.671.67 (1.49-1.86), No. studies: 18
3CoughAdultsInhalationvisible dampness and/or mold or mold odoryes/noOR01.521.52 (1.18-1.96), No. studies: 6
4CoughChildrenInhalationvisible dampness and/or mold or mold odoryes/noOR01.751.75 (1.56-1.96), No. studies: 6
5WheezeAllInhalationvisible dampness and/or mold or mold odoryes/noOR01.501.50 (1.38-1.64), No. studies: 22
6WheezeAdultsInhalationvisible dampness and/or mold or mold odoryes/noOR01.391.39 (1.04-1.85), No. studies: 5
7WheezeChildrenInhalationvisible dampness and/or mold or mold odoryes/noOR01.531.53 (1.39-1.68), No. studies: 17
8Current asthmaAllInhalationvisible dampness and/or mold or mold odoryes/noOR01.561.56 (1.30-1.86), No. studies: 10
9Ever-diagnosed asthmaAllInhalationvisible dampness and/or mold or mold odoryes/noOR01.371.37 (1.23-1.53), No. studies: 8
10Ever-diagnosed asthmaChildrenInhalationvisible dampness and/or mold or mold odoryes/noOR01.351.35 (1.20-1.51), No. studies: -
11Asthma developmentAllInhalationvisible dampness and/or mold or mold odoryes/noOR01.341.34 (0.86-2.10), No. studies: 4
12BronchitisAllInhalationvisible dampness and/or mold or mold odoryes/noOR01.451.45 (1.32-1.59), No. studies: -
13BronchitisChildrenInhalationvisible dampness and/or mold or mold odoryes/noOR01.381.38 (1.28-1.47), No. studies: -
14Respiratory infectionsAllInhalationvisible dampness and/or mold or mold odoryes/noOR01.441.44 (1.31-1.59), No. studies: -
15Respiratory infectionsAdultsInhalationvisible dampness and/or mold or mold odoryes/noOR01.491.49 (1.14-1.95), No. studies: -
16Respiratory infectionsChildrenInhalationvisible dampness and/or mold or mold odoryes/noOR01.481.48 (1.33-1.65), No. studies: -
17Sensitivity to inhaled antigensChildrenInhalationvisible dampness and/or mold or mold odoryes/noOR01.331.33 (1.23-1.44), No. studies: -
18Hay feverChildrenInhalationvisible dampness and/or mold or mold odoryes/noOR01.351.35 (1.18-1.53), No. studies: -

Page-specific entries (indices that have exactly one value each for the whole variable; usually mentioned in the title and/or in the scope.):

  • Pollutant: visible dampness and/or mold or mold odor
  • Threshold: 0
  • Exposure metric: yes/no
  • Exposure route: Inhalation


----#: . You can leave the columns listed above out of the table, because all rows have the same value. If you do, then you MUST put the respective information to Category:Exposure-response functions. --Jouni 17:38, 23 January 2012 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: comment)

⇤--#: . If possible, "Disease" should be something that has an ICT-10 code (in this case, the information that is in column "Response metric". In contrast, "Response metric" should describe how the disease was measured: number of cases, incidence, prevalence,... --Jouni 17:38, 23 January 2012 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: attack)

⇤--#: . The comment emphasizing some changes is more than a year old and there are no changes or any kind of reactions to it. --Isabell Rumrich 10:29, 4 February 2013 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: attack)

Rationale

Data

Odds ratios for different health effects in homes with vs. without visible dampness and/or mold or mold odor. [1] [2]
Outcome Subjects No. studies Odds ratio central estimate (95 % CI) Estimated % increase in damp homes
Upper respiratory tract symptoms All 13 1.70 (1.44–2.00) 52
Cough All 18 1.67 (1.49–1.86) 50
Adults 6 1.52 (1.18–1.96)
Children 12 1.75 (1.56–1.96)
Wheeze All 22 1.50 (1.38–1.64) 44
Adults 5 1.39 (1.04–1.85)
Children 17 1.53 (1.39–1.68)
Current asthma All 10 1.56 (1.30–1.86) 50
Ever-diagnosed asthma All 8 1.37 (1.23–1.53) 33
Children 1.35 (1.20–1.51)
Asthma development All 4 1.34 (0.86–2.10) 30
Bronchitis All 1.45 (1.32–1.59)
Children 1.38 (1.28–1.47)
Respiratory infections All 1.44 (1.31–1.59)
Adults 1.49 (1.14–1.95)
Children 1.48 (1.33–1.65)
Sensitivity to inhaled antigens Children 1.33 (1.23–1.44)
Hay fever Children 1.35 (1.18–1.53)

Dependencies

=== Unit === ⇤--#: . Unit is not a part of Rationale, it could be added to the data table. --Isabell Rumrich 10:37, 4 February 2013 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: attack)

OR per yes/no visible dampness and/or mold or mold odor

Calculations

  • Generates random samples of possible ORs.
    • Normal distribution assumed, sd estimated from confidence interval using sd = (upper bound - lower bound)/3.92


+ Show code

←--#: . R-code runs now. --Isabell Rumrich 10:30, 4 February 2013 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence)

See also

Keywords

References

  1. W. J. Fisk, Q. Lei-Gomez, M. J. Mendell. Meta-analyses of the associations of respiratory health effects with dampness and mold in homes. Indoor Air 2007; 17: 284–296. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0668.2007.00475.x
  2. Mendell et al. 2011. Respiratory and allergic health effects of dampness and mold, and dampness-related agents: a review of the epidemiological evidence. Environmental Health Perspectives 119(6), 748-756.

Related files

<mfanonymousfilelist></mfanonymousfilelist>