Endometriosis: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Category:Health effects]] | [[Category:Health effects]] | ||
{{ | {{template:Heimtsa incidence database|moderator=Teemu R}} | ||
==Scope== | ==Scope== | ||
What is the prevalence of endometriosis in the general population? | What is the prevalence of endometriosis in the general population? | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| n=4034, Sør-Trøndelag (Norway), endometriosis | | n=4034, Sør-Trøndelag (Norway), endometriosis | ||
| | | | ||
| MOEN M. H.; SCHEI B.; Epidemiology of endometriosis in a Norwegian county. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica 1997, vol. 76, no6, pp. 559-562 | | <ref>MOEN M. H.; SCHEI B.; Epidemiology of endometriosis in a Norwegian county. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica 1997, vol. 76, no6, pp. 559-562</ref> | ||
|---- | |---- | ||
| 16 million women (estimate) | | 16 million women (estimate) | ||
| EU member states, endometriosis | | EU member states, endometriosis | ||
| | | | ||
| http://www.endonetwork.eu/ | | <ref>http://www.endonetwork.eu/</ref> | ||
|---- | |---- | ||
| Because of the need for surgical diagnosis, the prevalence of endometriosis in the general population is unknown. <br/>Estimates from asymptomatic fertile subpopulations undergoing tubal ligation have varied greatly from 0.7 – 43% around a mean of 4% (Eskanazi and Warner, 1997). However, up to 90% of those women were diagnosed with minimal or mild endometriosis. | | Because of the need for surgical diagnosis, the prevalence of endometriosis in the general population is unknown. <br/>Estimates from asymptomatic fertile subpopulations undergoing tubal ligation have varied greatly from 0.7 – 43% around a mean of 4% (Eskanazi and Warner, 1997). However, up to 90% of those women were diagnosed with minimal or mild endometriosis. | ||
| Endometriosis | | Endometriosis | ||
| Surgical diagnosis | | Surgical diagnosis | ||
| Krina T. Zondervan, Lon R. Cardon and Stephen H. Kennedy. What makes a good case–control study? Design issues for complex traits such as endometriosis Human Reproduction, Vol. 17, No. 6, 1415-1423, June 2002 | | <ref>Krina T. Zondervan, Lon R. Cardon and Stephen H. Kennedy. What makes a good case–control study? Design issues for complex traits such as endometriosis Human Reproduction, Vol. 17, No. 6, 1415-1423, June 2002</ref> | ||
|---- | |---- | ||
| 0.7% in women undergoing tubal anastomosis <br/>1.6% for laparoscopic tubal ligation <br/>11.3% for abdominal hysterectomy <br/>31% for operative laparoscopy. <br/>On the basis of these data, a prevalence of 10 % can be estimated. | | 0.7% in women undergoing tubal anastomosis <br/>1.6% for laparoscopic tubal ligation <br/>11.3% for abdominal hysterectomy <br/>31% for operative laparoscopy. <br/>On the basis of these data, a prevalence of 10 % can be estimated. | ||
| Endometriosis | | Endometriosis | ||
| | | | ||
| David L. Olive, and Lisa Barrie Schwartz. Endometriosis. Medical Progess Volume 328:1759-1769 June 17, 1993 Number 24 | | <ref>David L. Olive, and Lisa Barrie Schwartz. Endometriosis. Medical Progess Volume 328:1759-1769 June 17, 1993 Number 24</ref> | ||
|---- | |---- | ||
|} | |} | ||
Latest revision as of 11:42, 1 July 2010
| Moderator:Teemu R (see all) | ||
|
| ||
| Upload data
|
{{#opasnet_base_link:Op_en4532}} | |
This page is a part of Heimtsa incidence database. | ||
Scope
What is the prevalence of endometriosis in the general population?
Definition
| Rate (age, sex ratio) | Context (population size studied, location, date data taken, end-point measured) | Definition of end-point | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prevalence of endometriosis is 2.0% and the annual incidence is less than 0.3% for women in their early forties. | n=4034, Sør-Trøndelag (Norway), endometriosis | [1] | |
| 16 million women (estimate) | EU member states, endometriosis | [2] | |
| Because of the need for surgical diagnosis, the prevalence of endometriosis in the general population is unknown. Estimates from asymptomatic fertile subpopulations undergoing tubal ligation have varied greatly from 0.7 – 43% around a mean of 4% (Eskanazi and Warner, 1997). However, up to 90% of those women were diagnosed with minimal or mild endometriosis. |
Endometriosis | Surgical diagnosis | [3] |
| 0.7% in women undergoing tubal anastomosis 1.6% for laparoscopic tubal ligation 11.3% for abdominal hysterectomy 31% for operative laparoscopy. On the basis of these data, a prevalence of 10 % can be estimated. |
Endometriosis | [4] |
Result
{{#opasnet_base_link:Op_en4532}}
See also
Related files
<mfanonymousfilelist></mfanonymousfilelist>
References
- ↑ MOEN M. H.; SCHEI B.; Epidemiology of endometriosis in a Norwegian county. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica 1997, vol. 76, no6, pp. 559-562
- ↑ http://www.endonetwork.eu/
- ↑ Krina T. Zondervan, Lon R. Cardon and Stephen H. Kennedy. What makes a good case–control study? Design issues for complex traits such as endometriosis Human Reproduction, Vol. 17, No. 6, 1415-1423, June 2002
- ↑ David L. Olive, and Lisa Barrie Schwartz. Endometriosis. Medical Progess Volume 328:1759-1769 June 17, 1993 Number 24