Talk:Population of Helsinki metropolitan area
Geographic Extent
| Fact discussion: . |
|---|
| Opening statement: Administrative boundaries should define study area
Closing statement: Resolution not yet found. (A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
←--1: . Assessment includes only the Helsinki Met Area, and these boundaries should be used to 'clip' higher resolution population data (e.g. EEA grid) if used --Dvienneau 14:57, 17 February 2009 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence) ←--2: . The adminstrative boundaries define the study area indeed. The population data could be organised in different grids, because this provides more detailed information --Eva Kunseler 15:08, 18 February 2009 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence) |
Source of data
| Fact discussion: . |
|---|
| Opening statement: The source of data should not be defined as a boundary
Closing statement: Accepted! (A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
←--#:: . There could be other sources of data that can be used to define this variable --Eva Kunseler 15:31, 18 February 2009 (EET)--Dvienneau 15:42, 18 February 2009 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence)
|
Validity of Projections
| Fact discussion: . |
|---|
| Opening statement: Validity of Statistics FI population projections
Closing statement: Resolution not yet found. (A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
←--1: . How can we assess the validity of these projections? Can we assign errors/confidence intervals to these projections? --Dvienneau 14:06, 18 February 2009 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence) ←--2: . How sensitive are Assessment on impacts of emission trading on city-level (ET-CL) assessment results to uncertainty in the population projections --Dvienneau 14:06, 18 February 2009 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence)
|