Talk:PM2.5 emissions in Hämeenkyrö
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
PM2.5 emissions in Hämeenkyrö
| Fact discussion: . |
|---|
| Opening statement: Emissions should be given per sector
Closing statement: Accepted (A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
←--1: . It is important to be able to compare different risks. Seeing emission values for each sector makes this easier. The new emissions from the plants can then be put into perspective with variables people can perceive: they may have previous experience or a feeling about the amount of smoke coming from homes, or factories. --Jouni 06:05, 22 September 2006 (EEST)--Päivi Roivainen 09:59, 22 September 2006 (EEST) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence)
|
| Fact discussion: . |
|---|
| Opening statement: Well-being of local population is not an input to this variable
Closing statement: Accepted (A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
←--2: . The whole emissions variable, and the PM2.5 emissions in Hämeenkyrö as its subvariable, is an input to the well-being of local population variable, not vice versa Mikko Pohjola 11:05, 26 September 2006 (EEST) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence)
|