Talk:Open assessment method

How to read discussions

Fact discussion: .
Opening statement: Rename open risk assessment into open assessment. Closing statement: Accepted. (A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.)
Argumentation: ←--1: . We should rename Open Risk Assessment into Open Assessment as it has a wider field of application than just Risk Assessment. --Alexandra Kuhn 17:06, 6 March 2008 (EET), --Jouni 00:59, 8 March 2008 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence) ⇤--2: . OA does not refer to environmental health impact assessment (what heande is about). It can therefore refer to an assessment of any issue what so ever (e.g. impacts of acid fall-out on lichen growth). But yes, it is however reasonable to seek for a wider field of application. Something similar as EIA (environmental impact assessment) should be chosen. How about OHIA? --Anna Karjalainen 11.45, 7 May 2008 (type: truth; paradigms: science: attack) ⇤--3: . Methodologically, there is no need to distinguish environmental health issues from others. Therefore, open assessment is the right word for the method and its products. --Jouni 11:27, 12 June 2008 (EEST) (type: truth; paradigms: science: attack)