Public health impacts of GHG emission reduction strategies in household energy use

From Opasnet
Jump to navigation Jump to search



Assessment is based on the work by Wilkinson et al. 2009[1]

File:HIA housing energy Wilkinson09.ana

Scope

Purpose

Health impacts of different climate change mitigation strategies aimed at reducing GHG emissions from household energy use.

Boundaries

Spatial:

  • United Kingdom

Temporal:

  • Impacts during one year, reference year 2010

Population:

  • UK total population

Policy strategies:

  • Increased energy efficiency of household heating by
    • Increased insulation by dwelling fabric improvements
    • Improved dwelling ventilation control
    • Fuel switching from indoor household fossil fuel combustion to electricity
    • Reduce in indoor temperatures by change in occupant behaviour

Scenarios

  • Baseline
    • Distributions of efficiency for UK housing stock and associated GHG emissions and health effects
  • Scenario 1: dwelling fabric improvements
    • Overall heat loss of the fabric reduced from 224 J/s per ºC to 98 j/s per ºC
  • Scenario 2: improved dwelling ventilation control
    • The present permeability of the housing stock shifted to present reduced air leakage in all dwellings
    • Tightest dwellings (3 m3/m2 per h) assumed to have ideal mechanical ventilation
  • Scenario 3: fuel switching
    • All indoor combustion replaced by electricity
    • Effects on CO2 emission not modelled
  • Scenario 4: Occupant behaviour
    • Indoor temperature in all dwellings with average temperature > 18 ºC decreased by 1 ºC. Temperatures ≤18 ºC unchanged.
  • Scenario 5: combination of scenarios 1-4

Intended users

Participants

Definition

Decision variables

  • Dwelling fabric improvements (yes/no)
  • Improved ventilation control (yes/no)
  • Fuel switch to electricity (yes/no)
  • Decrease in indoor temperatures (yes/no)

Indicators

  • Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs)
  • Premature deaths
  • Household energy sector greenhouse gas emissions

Value variables

Other variables

Indoor exposures

  • Fine particles (PM2.5, µg/m3)
    • Baseline: 5.5
    • Scenario 1: 5.5
    • Scenario 2: 4.6
    • Scenario 3: 3.7
    • Scenario 4: 5.5
    • Scenario 5: 2.5
  • Radon (Bq/m3)
    • Baseline: 21.7
    • Scenario 1: 21.7
    • Scenario 2: 17.2
    • Scenario 3: 21.7
    • Scenario 4: 21.7
    • Scenario 5: 17.2
  • Carbon monoxide (CO, probability of poisoning)
    • Baseline: 1E-6
    • Scenario 1: 1E-6
    • Scenario 2: 1E-6
    • Scenario 3: 0
    • Scenario 4: 1E-6
    • Scenario 5: 0
  • Environmental tobacco smoke (ETS, exposure expressed in ETS units)
    • Baseline: 1.5
    • Scenario 1: 1.5
    • Scenario 2: 1.7
    • Scenario 3: 1.5
    • Scenario 4: 1.5
    • Scenario 5: 1.7
  • Mould growth (% with mold index >1)
    • Baseline: 17.7
    • Scenario 1: 17.3
    • Scenario 2: 20.3
    • Scenario 3: 17.7
    • Scenario 4: 18.7
    • Scenario 5: 20.8
  • Cold (winter indoor temperature C)
    • Baseline: 18.1
    • Scenario 1: 18.4
    • Scenario 2: 18.2
    • Scenario 3: 18.1
    • Scenario 4: 17.9
    • Scenario 5: 18.5

Exposure-response functions

Analyses

  • Comparative health impact assessment
  • Sensitivity analyses

Indices

  • Age
  • Pollutant

Result

Results

Change per million population compared with baseline scenario

Premature deaths Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 4 Scenario 5
PM2.5 0 -32 -64 0 -107
Radon 0 3 0 0 3
CO 0 0 -1 0 -1
ETS 0 24 0 0 24
Mold 0 0 0 0 0
Cold -7 -1 0 0 -8
Total -7 -6 -65 0 -89
DALYs
PM2.5 0 -310 -619 0 -1026
Radon 0 43 0 0 43
CO 0 0 -25 0 -25
ETS 0 219 0 0 219
Mold -2 12 0 5 15
Cold -60 -12 0 0 -72
Total -62 -48 -644 5 -847
CO2 emissions (MT) -33 -6 0 2 41


Change in disease burdens per MT CO2 saved

Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 4 Scenario 5
Premature deaths -12.2 -64 - 0 -133
DALYs -115 -492 - 17.3 -1267

Conclusions

See also

References

  1. Wilkinson P., Smith K.R., Davies M., Adair H., Armstrong B.G., Barrett M., Bruce N., Haines A., Hamilton I., Oreszcyn T., Ridley I., Tonne C. & Chalabi Z. Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions: household energy. Health and Climate Series 4, The Lancet. Published online November 25, 2009. Doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61713-X [1]