Costs of waste transport at Hämeenkyrö region

From Opasnet
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Scope

Changes of waste transportation costs at Hämeenkyrö region due to the Hämeenkyrö MSWI.

Definition

Data

We focus on three different scenarios of waste transport at Hämeenkyrö region:

  • 0. Current situation: waste is transported to landfill (Tampere)
  • 1. Future situation 1: waste is transported to MSWI elsewhere
  • 2. Future situation 2: MSWI uses both munisipal solid waste and industrial solid waste and purchases the waste material at the shortest possible distance
  • 3. Future situation 3: MSWI uses only municipal solid waste and purchases the waste material further away

Scenario 0 Assumptions:

  • Pirkanmaan jätehuolto collects the waste at Hämeenkyrö and transports it to landfill at Tampre or at Nokia

Scenario 1 Assumptions:

  • Pirkanmaan jätehuolto collects the waste at Hämeenkyrö and transports it to Tampere: nearest MSWI assumed to be built in Tampere. Tampere is used as an example site with short transport distances. R↻

Scenario 2 Assumptions:

  • MSWI purchases 100 000 tons of municipal solid waste/year from Pirkanmaan jätehuolto,
  • 20000 tons of industrial waste/year from M-real and
  • 80000 tons of industrial waste /year from solid waste treatment plant at Viljakkala
  • waste collection and transportation costs inside the area of Pirkanmaan jätehuotlo do not change significantly if the waste is transported to Hämeenkyrö instead of Tampere and Nokia
  • transportation costs: 0,12-0,23 €/t/km, waste collection costs inside each municipal are not counted, because they assumed to be constant in all scenarios
  • distance between M-real plant and MSWI: 1,5 km
  • distance between Viljakkala and MSWI : 15 km

Uncertainties:

  • this model assumes that waste of M-real plat is transported to MSWI. In reality, that could shorten the existing waste transport route
  • solid waste treatment plant at Viljakkala is not established yet

Scenario 3: Assumptions: Sources of waste:

  • 100 000 tons of municipal solid waste/year from Pirkanmaan jätehuolto,
  • 100 000 tons of municipal solid waste/year from other municipals
  • average transport distance from other municipal centres 109 km
  • long-distance transports made by vehicle of 40 ton capacity
  • transportation costs: 0,12-0,23 €/t/km
  • waste collection costs inside each municipal not counted, because they assumed to be constant in all scenarios: only transportations between municipal centres are counted

References


Causality

Unit

€/year

Formula

Result

Scenario 0:

  • Waste transport costs do not change in Hämeenkyrö compared to current situation

Scenario 1:

  • Waste transport costs do not change in Hämeenkyrö compared to current situation

Scenario 2

  • Assumed that the total municipal solid waste transportation cost does not change inside the region of Pirkanmaa jätehuolto, additional cost of waste transportation would be 0,1-0,3 milj. €/year
  • Number of waste transport vehicles will increase by 61/day (by 122/d to both directions)

Scenario 3

  • Additional cost of waste transportation would be 1,2-2,4 milj. €/year
  • Number of waste transport vehicles will increase by 53/day (by 106/d to both directions)

See also

References