Talk:RM analysis oluyemitoyinbo
Exercise evaluation
Analysis vs. object of analysis
* ability to differentiate between the analysis (knowledge creating process of studying real-world phenomena) and the phenomena that the analysis looks into
←--1: . The focus of the evaluation is mostly on the analysis plans and the knowledge they intend to create. --Mikko Pohjola 12:17, 25 May 2011 (EEST) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence)
⇤--2: . At times the evaluation however hovers between evaluating the analyses and evaluating or describing the decision/action options intended to be considered in the analyses. --Mikko Pohjola 12:17, 25 May 2011 (EEST) (type: truth; paradigms: science: attack)
Score: 1/2
Analysis-use relationship
* ability to consider the possible meaning/value of the knowledge intended to be created by the planned analysis in different uses by different users
←--3: . The varying meaning of different analyses for different uses/users is considered. --Mikko Pohjola 12:17, 25 May 2011 (EEST) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence)
Score: 2/2
Usability of evaluation
* identification of major strengths as well as possible points of improvement * critical and constructive remarks to help develop the analysis (plan) further
←--4: . The main ideas in the analyses, and some of their strengths and limitations are identified. --Mikko Pohjola 12:17, 25 May 2011 (EEST) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence)
⇤--5: . As the evaluation in many parts remains on the level of describing either the idea behind the analyses or the decision/action options they look into, the evaluation does not provide the best possible guidance for those who intend to take the analysis plans further. --Mikko Pohjola 12:17, 25 May 2011 (EEST) (type: truth; paradigms: science: attack)
Score: 2/4
Summarizing
* wrapping-up of the individual evaluations and tying them into the context described in the exercise description
←--1: . An overall statement that somewhat ties into the given context is provided. --Mikko Pohjola 12:17, 25 May 2011 (EEST) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence)
Score: 1/2
Bonus points
* e.g. value adding extra work done
Total Score: 6/10