Talk:Open science and research roadmap 2014–2017

From Opasnet
Revision as of 14:15, 27 January 2015 by Jouni (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

GovLab practices in Opasnet (Opaslab)

Instructions for application:
  • Hakukuulutus Avoimen tieteen ja tutkimuksen edistäminen sekä avoimuuden hyödyntäminen innovaatiotoiminnassa [1]


GovLab practices in Opasnet (Opaslab) is a research and development project that aims to combine lessons learned from three important lines of work. They have each worked in different areas, but their synergism is what makes this project unique:

  • Opasnet is a web workspace for making science-based impact assessments and models to support societal decision making. The web workspace is designed to implement open policy practice, a systematic method to produce relevant information for decision support.
  • The GovLab is an organisation within the New York University developing new practices for open governance. Their key method is to test ideas in practice to see what works.
  • Innovillage is a project within the National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL) in Finland. It aims at collecting, developing, and sharing good practices within the health sector.

The objectives of this project are to:

  1. bring the open policy practice method into a new setting in the GovLab and test for its applicability,
  2. develop open policy practice further based on lessons learned in the GovLab,
  3. describe the new practices in Innovillage as a platform to share the practices further,
  4. implement the new practices with CSC - IT center for science in practical cases in Finnish governance.

The Ministry of Education and Culture of Finland has developed a roadmap for open science http://en.opasnet.org/w/Open_science_roadmap (with my comments in blue and green)

They have also produced a related open science and research handbook (draft 1.0 available): http://openscience.fi/handbook

We in THL have developed a method called open policy practice http://en.opasnet.org/w/OPP which is based on the idea of open information processes. The Opasnet website was developed as a workspace where open policy practice can be practically implemented.

But the development work by the ministry and the work by us has not converged before, and this is the time to do it. So, I suggest that

  1. I will merge the ideas from the handbook (or handbook version 2, which should be published soon) and open policy practice into one coherent open science and policy handbook (let's call it version 3),
  2. possibly update some functionalities in Opasnet, if the handbook v3 warrants that,
  3. then come to New York where I will explore the relevance of the handbook v3+Opasnet to your civic tech/governance-oriented research and advisory work in several policy areas, health care primary among them,
  4. at the same time, I will explore the relevance of your project-based innovations, both analytical and technological, as well as those of individuals and groups in our extended networks, to the further development of handbook v3+Opasnet,
  5. back in Finland, I will produce a draft handbook v4+Opasnet (with maybe some additional functionalities) to the ministry for review and implementation.
Kutsukirje

We are aware of your work in developing open policy practice and the related Opasnet web workspace. These are interesting demonstrations of open science and democracy. We are also aware of your interest in evaluating these against the Open Science and Research Roadmap published by the The Ministry of Education and Culture of Finland, as well as your interest in developing these ideas and practices further.

As you and I have discussed, our mutual expectation is that, during your time with us, you will explore the relevance of the ideas and functionality embedded in the Roadmap, open policy practice, and Opasnet to our civic tech/governance-oriented research and advisory work in several policy areas, health care primary among them. At the same time, you will explore the relevance of our project-based innovations, both analytical and technological, as well as those of individuals and groups in our extended networks, to the further development of Opasnet, open policy practice, and open science in Finland.

We will be happy to provide you with office space, technical support, wireless access, and an eager group of interested and interesting colleagues. We will not, however, be responsible for your compensation, benefits, living arrangements, or travel expenses.


Hakemus

Hakijan nimi / Sökandens namn (yhteisön rekisteröity nimi / registrerat namn på sammanslutning) *

Terveyden ja hyvinvoinnin laitos

Nimilyhenne / Namnförkortning

THL

Hakijan kotikunta /Sökandens hemkommun

Helsinki

Yhteisön yhteyshenkilö /Sammanslutningens kontaktperson

Jouni Tuomisto

Hakijayhteisön Y-tunnus/ Sammanslutningens FO-nummer

?

PRH
n yhdistys-, säätiö- tai kaupparekisterin rek.nro ja ensirek.pvm / Förenings-, stiftelse- eller handelsregistrets reg.nr och första reg.dag (PRS)

?

Lähiosoite / Näradress

Mannerheimintie 166 / PL 30

Postinumero / Postnummer, Postitoimipaikka / Postanstalt

00271 Helsinki

Sähköpostiosoite / E-postadress

jouni.tuomisto.at.thl.fi

Puhelin / Telefon työ / tjänst Telefax

029-5246305

Haettava määrä euroina / Belopp som söks i euro
Hakijan pankkitili / Sökandens bankkonto ** IBAN BIC
Hakemuksen aihealue (ilmoituksesta tai hakuohjeista www.minedu.fi) Ansökningens ämnesområde (från annons eller ansökningsanvisningar www.minedu.fi)

Erityisavustus tiede- ja korkeakoulupolitiikan kehittämishankkeisiin

Valtionavustuslaji (kts. seuraava sivu) / Slag av statsunderstöd (se nästa sida)
yleisavustus / allmänt understöd ___
erityisavustus / specialunderstöd _X_
Hankkeen nimi / Projektets namn
Hankkeen suunniteltu alkamis- ja päättymisaika / Datum för projektets planerade början och slut

1.9.2015 - 30.6.2016

Avustuksen käyttötarkoitus (voidaan jatkaa liitteessä) / Understödets ändamål (kan fortsättas i bilaga)
Liitteet
  1. Avustettavaa hanketta koskeva suunnitelma. Toimintasuunnitelmasta tulee käydä ilmi hankkeen toiminta-ajatus, keskeiset kehittämiskohteet hankekaudella (rahoituskausi 2015-2016) sekä tavoitteet vaikuttavuudelle vuosina 2015-2017.
  2. Erittely hankkeen kokonaiskustannuksista ja hankkeesta saatavista tuloista sekä arvio niiden ajoittumisesta neljännesvuoden tarkkuudella. Muut samaa tarkoitusta varten saadut ja haetut avustukset.
  3. Selvitys nimenkirjoitusoikeudesta (esim. yhdistys-, säätiö tai kaupparekisteriote)
  4. hakijayhteisön toimintakertomus tai muu vastaava selvitys edelliseltä tilikaudelta,
  5. yhteisön tuloslaskelma, tase ja tilintarkastuskertomus edelliseltä tilikaudelta.
  6. Mikäli hakija ei ole saanut opetus- ja kulttuuriministeriöltä avustusta aikaisemmin tulee hakemukseen liittää tiedot hakijayhteisöstä: yhdistysrekisteriote, yhteisön säännöt, yhteisön hallituksen/johtokunnan kokoonpano, jäsenten lukumäärä (henkilöjäsenet ja yhteisöjäsenet).

See also

Retrieved from "https://en.opasnet.org/index.php?title=Talk:Open_science_and_research_roadmap_2014–2017&oldid=34440"