Talk:Population of Helsinki metropolitan area: Difference between revisions
Eva Kunseler (talk | contribs) |
Eva Kunseler (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
{{defend|#: |The adminstrative boundaries define the study area indeed. The population data could be organised in different grids, because this provides more detailed information|--[[User:Eva Kunseler|Eva Kunseler]] 15:08, 18 February 2009 (EET)}} | {{defend|#: |The adminstrative boundaries define the study area indeed. The population data could be organised in different grids, because this provides more detailed information|--[[User:Eva Kunseler|Eva Kunseler]] 15:08, 18 February 2009 (EET)}} | ||
== Source of data == | |||
{{discussion | |||
|Dispute= The source of data should not be defined as a boundary | |||
|Outcome= Under discussion (to be changed when a conclusion is found) | |||
|Argumentation = {{defend|#: |There could be other sources of data that can be used to define this variable|--[[User:Eva Kunseler|Eva Kunseler]] 15:31, 18 February 2009 (EET)}}}} | |||
== Validity of Statistics FI population projections == | == Validity of Statistics FI population projections == | ||
Revision as of 13:31, 18 February 2009
Geographic Extent
| Fact discussion: . |
|---|
| Opening statement:
Closing statement: Resolution not yet found. (A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
←--1:: . Assessment includes only the Helsinki Met Area, and these boundaries should be used to 'clip' higher resolution population data (e.g. EEA grid) if used --Dvienneau 14:57, 17 February 2009 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence)
|
←--#:: . The adminstrative boundaries define the study area indeed. The population data could be organised in different grids, because this provides more detailed information --Eva Kunseler 15:08, 18 February 2009 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence)
Source of data
| Fact discussion: . |
|---|
| Opening statement:
Closing statement: Resolution not yet found. (A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
←--#:: . There could be other sources of data that can be used to define this variable --Eva Kunseler 15:31, 18 February 2009 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence)
|
Validity of Statistics FI population projections
⇤--1:: . How can we assess the validity of these projections? Can we assign errors/confidence intervals to these projections? --Dvienneau 14:06, 18 February 2009 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: attack) ⇤--2:: . How sensitive are Assessment on impacts of emission trading on city-level (ET-CL) assessment results to uncertainty in the population projections --Dvienneau 14:06, 18 February 2009 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: attack)
Re: Validity of Statistics FI population projections
You might want to contact Statistics Finland to have them explain how they derive these numbers and formulate your uncertainty interval