Talk:Open assessment method: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
(resolution) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{discussion | {{discussion | ||
|Dispute= Rename | |Dispute= Rename open risk assessment into open assessment. | ||
|Outcome= | |Outcome= Accepted. | ||
|Argumentation = | |Argumentation = | ||
{{defend|#1: |We should rename Open Risk Assessment into Open Assessment as it has a wider field of application than just Risk Assessment.|--[[User:Alexandra Kuhn|Alexandra Kuhn]] 17:06, 6 March 2008 (EET), --[[User:Jouni|Jouni]] 00:59, 8 March 2008 (EET)}} | {{defend|#1: |We should rename Open Risk Assessment into Open Assessment as it has a wider field of application than just Risk Assessment.|--[[User:Alexandra Kuhn|Alexandra Kuhn]] 17:06, 6 March 2008 (EET), --[[User:Jouni|Jouni]] 00:59, 8 March 2008 (EET)}} | ||
{{ | {{attack_invalid|#2: |OA does not refer to environmental health impact assessment (what heande is about). It can therefore refer to an assessment of any issue what so ever (e.g. impacts of acid fall-out on lichen growth). But yes, it is however reasonable to seek for a wider field of application. Something similar as EIA (environmental impact assessment) should be chosen. How about OHIA?|--[[User:Anna Karjalainen|Anna Karjalainen]] 11.45, 7 May 2008}} | ||
:{{attack|#3: |Methodologically, there is no need to distinguish environmental health issues from others. Therefore, open assessment is the right word for the method and its products.|--[[User:Jouni|Jouni]] 11:27, 12 June 2008 (EEST)}} | |||
}} | |||
Revision as of 08:27, 12 June 2008
| Fact discussion: . |
|---|
| Opening statement:
Closing statement: Resolution not yet found. (A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
←--#1:: . We should rename Open Risk Assessment into Open Assessment as it has a wider field of application than just Risk Assessment. --Alexandra Kuhn 17:06, 6 March 2008 (EET), --Jouni 00:59, 8 March 2008 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence) ⇤--#2:: . OA does not refer to environmental health impact assessment (what heande is about). It can therefore refer to an assessment of any issue what so ever (e.g. impacts of acid fall-out on lichen growth). But yes, it is however reasonable to seek for a wider field of application. Something similar as EIA (environmental impact assessment) should be chosen. How about OHIA? --Anna Karjalainen 11.45, 7 May 2008 (type: truth; paradigms: science: attack) |