Unattackedstand (paradigm): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Page creation) |
(categories added) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[op_fi:Kestää jos ei hyökätä (paradigma)]] | |||
[[Category:Paradigm]] | [[Category:Paradigm]] | ||
[[Category:Open policy practice]] | [[Category:Open policy practice]] |
Revision as of 08:59, 5 August 2018
Moderator:Jouni (see all) |
|
Upload data
|
The unattacked stand paradigm is a set of rules to make inferences about validity of arguments. It is used to produce shared understanding and describe differences in thinking.
Question
What inference rules are used when the unattacked stand paradigm is used?
Answer
- If an argument is attacked by a valid argument, it is considered invalid.
Rationale
The paradigm describes the view that everything is valid until proven otherwise.