Unattackedstand (paradigm): Difference between revisions

From Opasnet
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Page creation)
 
(categories added)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[op_fi:Kestää jos ei hyökätä (paradigma)]]
[[Category:Paradigm]]
[[Category:Paradigm]]
[[Category:Open policy practice]]
[[Category:Open policy practice]]

Revision as of 08:59, 5 August 2018


The unattacked stand paradigm is a set of rules to make inferences about validity of arguments. It is used to produce shared understanding and describe differences in thinking.

Question

What inference rules are used when the unattacked stand paradigm is used?

Answer

  1. If an argument is attacked by a valid argument, it is considered invalid.

Rationale

The paradigm describes the view that everything is valid until proven otherwise.

See also