Talk:Goherr: Task 5.3 Determinants of fish eating habits: Difference between revisions

From Opasnet
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
* Level of education
* Level of education


* How often and how much do you eat:
* How often do you eat? and how much do you eat: {{attack|# |These could be left out, as we already have consumptioin data for Finland, Denmark and Sweden from EFSA.|--[[User:Arja|Arja]] ([[User talk:Arja|talk]]) 04:05, 3 November 2015 (UTC)}}
** Salmon (Baltic sea?)
** Herring (size separated might be too difficult): Once or more per week, 1 - 3 times per month, Rarely, Don't eat at all
** Herring (size separated?)
** Salmon (Baltic sea?): Once or more per week, 1 - 3 times per month, Rarely, Don't eat at all
*** If not eating: What are the main three reasons for you not to eat Baltic sea fish? (Or Priorities the following based on your reasons of not eating Baltic sea fish):
*** If not eating: What are the main three reasons for you not to eat Baltic sea fish? (or "Priorities the following based on your reasons of not eating Baltic sea fish, 1 = most important reason"):
**** Don't like the taste
**** Don't like the taste
**** Not easily available
**** Not easily available
**** Difficult to cook
**** Difficult to cook
**** Harmful chemicals in it
**** Because of the harmful chemicals in it
**** I just prefer to eat some other fish
**** I just prefer to eat some other fish species
**** Don't like any kind of fish
**** Don't like any kind of fish
**** Allergy
**** Allergy
**** What else?
* Do you limit your consumption of Baltic sea fish (or fish in general?) because of the harmful chemicals in it? Yes/No
* Do you limit your consumption of Baltic sea fish (or fish in general?) because of the harmful chemicals in it? Yes/No
** If Yes: Do you think you would consume more Baltic sea fish (salmon and herring?) if amount of the harmful chemicals would be lower? Yes/No
** If Yes: Do you think you would consume more Baltic sea fish (salmon and herring?) if amount of the harmful chemicals would be lower? Yes/No {{comment|# |If Yes, we should also know how much more. But to be able to define this, we would need to know the starting level of the consumption|--[[User:Arja|Arja]] ([[User talk:Arja|talk]]) 04:05, 3 November 2015 (UTC)}}
* Are you familiar with the current national recommendations of eating Baltic sea fish? Yes/no
* Are you familiar with the current national recommendations of eating Baltic sea fish? Yes/no
* Are you familiar with the cardiovascular benefits of eating fish? Yes/No
* Are you familiar with the cardiovascular benefits of eating fish? Yes/No
Line 28: Line 29:
** 24% predicts that use of herring might increase in the near future
** 24% predicts that use of herring might increase in the near future
* Includes also question “I’ve stopped eating herring because of dioxins”
* Includes also question “I’ve stopped eating herring because of dioxins”
* *Seems not influence on use of herring
** Seems not to influence on use of herring
* Based on the questionnaire, population was divided into four groups of consumers: 23% spoiled youngsters (uusavuttomia), 14% critical hi-fi enthusiast, 37% passionate herring lovers and 26% concerned tradition treasurers
* Based on the questionnaire, population was divided into four groups of consumers: 23% spoiled youngsters (uusavuttomia), 14% critical hi-fi enthusiast, 37% passionate herring lovers and 26% concerned tradition treasurers

Revision as of 04:05, 3 November 2015

What should the questionnaire include?

  • Age
  • Gender
  • City
  • Level of education
  • How often do you eat? and how much do you eat: ⇤--#: . These could be left out, as we already have consumptioin data for Finland, Denmark and Sweden from EFSA. --Arja (talk) 04:05, 3 November 2015 (UTC) (type: truth; paradigms: science: attack)
    • Herring (size separated might be too difficult): Once or more per week, 1 - 3 times per month, Rarely, Don't eat at all
    • Salmon (Baltic sea?): Once or more per week, 1 - 3 times per month, Rarely, Don't eat at all
      • If not eating: What are the main three reasons for you not to eat Baltic sea fish? (or "Priorities the following based on your reasons of not eating Baltic sea fish, 1 = most important reason"):
        • Don't like the taste
        • Not easily available
        • Difficult to cook
        • Because of the harmful chemicals in it
        • I just prefer to eat some other fish species
        • Don't like any kind of fish
        • Allergy
        • What else?
  • Do you limit your consumption of Baltic sea fish (or fish in general?) because of the harmful chemicals in it? Yes/No
    • If Yes: Do you think you would consume more Baltic sea fish (salmon and herring?) if amount of the harmful chemicals would be lower? Yes/No ----#: . If Yes, we should also know how much more. But to be able to define this, we would need to know the starting level of the consumption --Arja (talk) 04:05, 3 November 2015 (UTC) (type: truth; paradigms: science: comment)
  • Are you familiar with the current national recommendations of eating Baltic sea fish? Yes/no
  • Are you familiar with the cardiovascular benefits of eating fish? Yes/No

Pro-Kala has done in Finland (2010) a questionnaire

  • 724 participants
  • Questions on use frequencies, type of consumed fish foods, attitudes on herring, how fish eating is predicted to change in the future
    • 70% of participants consume herring at least time to time
    • 24% predicts that use of herring might increase in the near future
  • Includes also question “I’ve stopped eating herring because of dioxins”
    • Seems not to influence on use of herring
  • Based on the questionnaire, population was divided into four groups of consumers: 23% spoiled youngsters (uusavuttomia), 14% critical hi-fi enthusiast, 37% passionate herring lovers and 26% concerned tradition treasurers