Beneris deliverables

This page is a encyclopedia article. The page identifier is Op_en4130
Moderator:Jouni (see all)
Upload data {{#opasnet_base_link:Op_en4130}}

Deliverable list

All deliverables can also be found from the Beneris page in Heande (password-protected).

Deliverables list (full duration of project)

Deliverable name	WP no.	Dissemination level	Success	Comments
D1 Workplan pyrkilo	WP1	RE	Successful.	Introduction of the method
D2 Beneris website	WP5	PU	Successful.	http://www.opasnet.org/beneris/index.php/Main_Page
D3 Kickoff meeting	WP6	RE	Successful.	Arranged together with Qalibra 23rd-24th May, 2006
D4 Project poster and brochure	WP7	PU	Successful.	Poster + 4 page brochyre
D5 Beneris&Qalibra dissemination strategy	WP6	RE	Finalised at a late stage.	Very active dissemination during the project was not possible because the method and case studies were still under development. The disseminating strategy that was accepted during the last year is ambitious and will be applied for a long time after the project. It is not yet possible to evaluate the success. For example, several publications are under preparation.
D6 Table of benefits of fish	WP3	PU	Successful.	In restricted website
D7 Database review: Contaminant food intake (pdf)	WP2	PU	Successful.	28 pages containing tables and introduction
D8 Improved dose response	WP1	RE	Successful.	Taylor approximation paper, 28 pages
D9 Ethical approval	WP2	RE	Technical report.1	Signed approval paper
D10 Food diaries	WP2	PU	Successful.	Excel file containing desired data
D11 Food intake data FIN	WP2	PU	Successful.	Excel file containing desired data
D12 Contaminant levels in fish	WP2	PU	Successful.	Excel sheet containing desired data
D13 First year report	WP7	PU	Technical report.	information both in wikiformat and in pdf 48 pages
D14 Dietary patterns	WP2	PU	Successful.	3 pages
D15 Pyrkilo guide 2	WP1	PU	Successful.	Publication by Tuomisto JT and Pohjola M
D16 Cardiovascular disease benefit meta-analysis	WP3	PU	Successful.	review, 23 pages
D17 Internet interface	WP5	PU	Successful.	Two wiki websites, Beneris and Heande wikis were launched.
D18 Subpopulation intakes	WP2	PU	Successful.	Children intakes 1,3,6 years
D19 Contaminants in placenta	WP2	PU	Successful.	Table for 117 contaminants. Additionally, a manuscript under finalization
D20 Intake of contaminants in children	WP2	PU	Successful.	Intakes for PCDD/F PCB, and Hg
D21 Intake of contaminants: national registries	WP2	PU	Successful after narrowing down the scope.	A manuscript (Karjalainen et al.) that is based on the deliverable work is under finalization. It is not openly available before publishing. The deliverable has been adjusted to include only Finnish data, because we failed to receive the PCDD/F concentration data that had been requested from the Commission during P2. This change is not important for the main outcome of Beneris, namely open assessment method and Opasnet workspace.
D22 Preliminary benefit-risk analysis of fish	WP3	PU	Successful.	Leino et al., Risk Analysis (Paper published Jan 2009)
D23 Second project meeting	WP6	RE	Successful.	Minutes and information published
D24 Midterm review report	WP7	PU	Successful.	1)Presentations, discussions, feedback 2)Mid term review, 32 pages 3)Reviewers' report, with response from the Beneris partners (pdf)
D25 Decision support system	WP1	RE	Successful.	The product itself is the improved software Uninet (downloadable from the Web). The deliverable contains a brief description of the method.
D26 Evaluation of patterns	WP2	PU	Successful but only for Finland.	Problems to receive data, see D21. The new version of D26 manuscript is now in press: Tero Hirvonen, Harri Sinkko, Anja Hallikainen, Hannu Kiviranta, Pirjo Pietinen, Liisa Valsta, Jouni T. Tuomisto: Modelling the intake of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans: impact of energy under-reporting and number of reporting days in dietary surveys. Food Additives and Contaminants (in press).
D27 Intakes based on patterns: Adults in Finland	WP2	PU	Successful.	Report containing 11 pages
D28 Review on other health benefits of fish (pdf)	WP3	PU	Successful.	Review containing 28 pages
D29-30 Contaminant intakes among Finnish adults, by sex and age group (pdf)	WP2	PU	Successful.	PCDD/F and PCBs, 4 pages, introduction and tables
D31 Enduser evaluation	WP5	PU	Successful.	Opasnet workshop 2009, 8 pages
D32 Critical dietary patterns in Finland	WP2	PU	Successful.	Report containing tables and comments, 17 pages
D33 Consumer information on case results	WP1	PU	Successful. Focus was more on methods and less on case results than originally planned.	Deliverable has been published in International Innovation.
D34 Second year report	WP7	PU	Technical report.	1)Activity report, 2)Management report, 3)Distribution of the Community's contribution report, 4)Appendix pages
D35 Pyrkilo guide 3	WP1	PU	Successful.	Report, 4 pages with link to pages
D36 Fetus contaminants from mother's diet	WP2	PU	Successful.
D37 Internet update	WP5	PU	Very successful.	Report, 11 pages
D38 Full benefit risk analysis of fish	WP3	PU	Successful.	A restricted Wiki-page with relevant links
D39 Combined database	WP2	PU	Very successful.
D40 Full benefit-risk analysis: vegetables	WP4	PU	Successful, given the new scope.	More emphasis was given to method development than originally planned. Therefore, the scope of this case study was reduced to one specific question, namely food fortification as an additional source of vitamins in children with low vegetable consumption.
D41 Third project report	WP7	PU	Technical report.	1)Activity report, 2)management report, 3)Distribution of the Community's contribution report, 4)Appendix pages
D42 VOI analysis of fish	WP5	PU	Successful.	In addition to performing the value of information analysis, we also developed the VOI analysis further especially for Bayesian belief networks (BBNs).
D43 Consumer reactions	WP5	PU	Partly successful.	The original plan was to study consumer reactions by using the ZMET technique. However, there was a delay in method development and case studies, and we found it infeasible to perform the study with an immature method. As a corrective action, an Internet survey was performed, and useful information from end users was obtained. Also, the technical capability to perform surveys in Opasnet was established due to this deliverable.
D44 Third project meeting	WP6	RE	Successful.	BENERIS wiki-page and minutes
D45 Application of BRA to FSA	WP1	PU	Successful.	BENERIS wiki-page
D46 End-user evaluation	WP5	PU	Successful.	BENERIS wiki-page
D47 Scientific advisory panel	WP6	RE	Successful.	The SAP was actively involved in the meetings and gave very good and critical comments. For example, these comments launched the development of protocols for quality assurance and quality control and peer review within Opasnet. This has proven very valuable.
D48a Fourth periodic report and D48b Final report	WP7	PU	Technical report.	D48a:1)Activity report, 2)management report, 3)Distribution of the Community's contribution report, 4)Appendix pages. D48b: 1) Publishable final activity report, 2)Final plan for using and disseminating the knowledge, 3)Final Management report, 4)Final DCC report (to be added later) (The Word/Excel files are located in the local folder N:/YTOS/Projects/BENERIS/Admin/Deliverables/D48b Final report)

¹ Technical report means that the deliverable does not contain new scientific data or understanding but rather reports what has been achieved or done.

Project objectives

Objective	Success	Comment
The general objective of this proposal is to create a framework for handling complicated benefit-risk situations, and apply it for analysis of the benefits and risks of certain foods. The first food commodity to be used in the development of the methodology is fish.	Very successful.	The framework was based on a novel idea of open participation on a web workspace. Although openness was described already in the Technical Annex, the importance and prospects of this approach was only understood during the first year of the project. A shift of emphasis from case studies towards framework development occurred starting from the first year, as described in annual reports and the mid-term meeting. The ambition level in method development clearly increased during the first year. This increased the amount and complexity of things to develop, which slowed down the progress. However, the end result was worth the effort: open assessment has solid scientific foundations, and it is widely applicable in many fields of assessment. The resulting framework will potentially contribute in a major change in the science-policy interaction in many areas, including but not limited to food. We did not promise to demonstrate a major change in real-world practices during the lifetime of the project, and as expected, we have not yet seen major changes. However, we are optimistic about this change in the near future, maybe in a few years. The web workspace and the framework developed are being and will be used in the future in new projects by Beneris partners and others, and the ideas of openness and collaboration are clearly spreading in the scientific community. This is a mega-trend and mostly independent of us, but the progress of openness has been faster in the area of benefit-risk assessment than elsewhere, thanks to the tools and methods developed in Beneris. This is because we started an active development of these methods in 2006, but the idea of openness and collaboration has only made a breakthrough in public discussion only in 2009. End results: Open assessment methodology or framework (D35); Opasnet workspace (D37; including the password-protected area Heande); Benefit-risk assessment of methyl mercury and omega-3 fatty acids in fish. Partners: all.
Objectives in developing benefit-risk analysis methods
To develop Bayesian belief networks (BBN) to handle complicated benefit-risk situations, and to develop a decision support system (DSS) based on BBN.	Successful.	Uninet software was further developed for open benefit-risk assessments for food. E.g. functionalities for linking Uninet models to Opasnet assessment descriptions were added. End results: Improved Uninet software (D25); Benefit-risk assessment of methyl mercury and omega-3 fatty acids in fish (D38). Partners: TUDelft, THL.
To develop improved methods for dose-response assessment, combining epidemiological and toxicological data, and apply them in combining epidemiological and toxicological information on fish contaminants (esp. dioxins and PCBs).	Successful.	An improved method was developed and utilised for dose-responses. It is based on a flexible mathematical method Taylor's expansion. In addition, reviews were performed to obtain dose-response data needed for case studies. End results: D8 Generalized dose-response method, D6 Table of benefits of fish, D38 Full benefit risk analysis of fish. Partners: TUDelft, THL, Foodfiles.
To develop an integrated repository of surveillance, nutrient and food consumption data that is capable of receiving, analyzing, and disseminating the accumulated data for benefit-risk analysis and to key stakeholders.	Successful.	The integrated repository Opasnet Base was developed with wide usability in mind. We wanted that it could contain very different kinds of information, basically anything that could be used in benefit-risk assessments. During the work (mostly second and third year) we realised that the database structure and interfaces need more work than we originally thought if the usability objective is to be met. Therefore, we put less emphasis in collecting raw data. The usability was demonstrated by the case studies. End results: Opasnet Base (D39). Examples of data: methylmercury data and the description of the data. Partners: THL, DTU, FIN, FSAI.
Scientific objectives in food risks and benefits
To review the existing databases and their availability for chemical contaminant data in Europe, and integrate available data.	Successful in review; problems in integration but leading to important lessons learned.	The data was reviewed as planned. However, the actual integration of contaminant data was clearly smaller than originally planned. There are two reasons for this. First, it was realised that method development is the more important part of the project than data production or collection. Second, it was found out that data ownership, intellectual property rights, or practical hindrances of the persons possessing the data effectively prevented a large-scale collection of data. Instead of spending more time on collection of specific pieces of data, we tried to understand the dynamics of data production and openness to be able to overcome the problem. End results: D7 Database review Contaminant food intake, lesson learned: data ownerships and IPR are a major hindrance of scientific progress. Thoughts about this: Open assessment in research, Respect theory. Partners: DTU, THL.
To estimate average nutrient intakes and food consumption in various subgroups based on national registries in three countries and to explore the use of the data in benefit-risk analysis.	Successful.	Several pieces of work were performed, as can be seen from the list of related deliverables. Several age groups were looked at as planned. End results: D11 Food intake data FIN, D10 Food diaries, D14 Dietary patterns, D18 Subpopulation intakes Partners: FIN, DTU, THL, FVST.
To estimate the health benefits of fish, and understand the effect of fish on different population subgroups (age, health, pregnancy etc.)	Successful.	A large Benefit-risk analysis of fish was performed. One part of it was focussing on pregnant mothers and fetal development. End results: D38, Benefit-risk assessment of methyl mercury and omega-3 fatty acids in fish. Partners: TUDelft, THL
To establish the association between external dose (intake) and internal dose (concentrations in the body) by analysing contaminants (PCDD/Fs, PCBs, PBDEs, organotin compounds, PCNs and Hg/methyl-Hg) from 100-200 placentas.	Successful.	130 placentas were analysed. The concentrations measured were compared to the pollutant intakes of the mothers. Pollutant exposures were estimated based on individual food intake records and measurements of pollutants in food. End results: The results are described in D19 Contaminants in placenta. Partners: THL, DTU.
To combine existing and new data from food consumption databases with data on levels of contaminants in fish. The special emphasis is on children and the developing foetus.	Successful.	New important chemical analyses were performed and linked with food consumption data. In this study, it was possible to link individual-level food intake to actual pollutant concentrations in the immediate environment (i.e., placenta) of the fetus. End results: D36 Fetus contaminants from mother's diet Partners: THL.
To estimate distributions of nutrient intake and food consumption relevant to benefit-risk analysis in a number of populations, and also the variability in exposure among various subgroups in the population.	Successful.	Several populations in several countries were studied. Results included inter-individual variation within several age groups and both sexes separately. End results: Food intake in Finland, Food intake in Denmark, Food intake in Spain,D11 Food intake data FIN, D10 Food diaries, D14 Dietary patterns, D18 Subpopulation intakes Partners: THL, DTU, FIN
To identify food consumption patterns and food choices that determine the intake of those nutrients and contaminants that are related to benefit/risk-balance of a food item.	Successful.	Dietary patterns were studied for Finland. End results: D14 Dietary patterns Partners: THL
To explore the usability of these patterns in another country than in which they were developed.	Successful after a shift in focus.	The original plan was to to create a food consumption pattern (a list of correlations between intakes of different food items) in one country and then predict food intake in another country based on this. When the work started, we found out that it is more feasible and relevant to study total nutrient intakes based on national data rather than trying to extrapolate from another country. These intake estimates were performed for three countries in the vegetable case study: Finland, Spain, and Ireland. End results: D40 Full benefit-risk analysis: vegetables Partners: THL, FIN, FSAI
To find out the effects of certain policy options on dietary habits and on intake of important nutrients and contaminants (e.g. vitamin D, n-3 fatty acids, dioxins, PCBs). As an example, does a restrictive recommendation on fish eating increase meat consumption?	Successful.	Food fortification was used as the policy option that was evaluated. We estimated the impacts the policy on the intakes of folate, vitamin A, and vitamin C. End results: D40 Full benefit-risk analysis: vegetables Partners: THL, FIN, FSAI
Objectives in dissemination
To integrate results into updated benefit-risk assessments, and evaluate the remaining uncertainties and their importance for decision-making.	Successful.	Value of information analysis was performed to the results of the fish case study. It was found out that the decision about increasing total fish intake would benefit from better information about methylmercury and omega-3 fatty acids in the most popular fish species, notably salmon and Baltic herring. In contrast, information about other topics is less valuable for the decision. In addition, we developed a new practical way of doing screening analyses of value of information. End results: Benefit-risk analysis of fish D38 Full benefit-risk analysis of fish, VOI analysis of fish D42 VOI analysis of fish Partners: THL, TUDelft
To evaluate the integration methodology by all partners and develop it further.	Mixed result: important lessons learned but not the way that was planned.	The methodology was presented to Beneris partners and one Qalibra partner in September 2007 in Berlin. It was discussed there. In addition, it was planned to be evaluated in more detail by FSAI. However, the methodology was found very confusing and different from traditional benefit-risk assessment. Detailed evaluation was considered impossible by FSAI, as explained in the fourth period report and D46 End user evaluation. Although the evaluation process itself was not very successful, it gave a lot of food for thought and boosted the development of the method into something more practical and understandable. It was a confusing learning experience, but in the end, we did learn many useful things that were important for the subsequent method development. The outcome did clearly improve due to the evaluation, which was, after all, its purpose. End results: D46 End user evaluation, Berlin 2007 meeting, new insights of the user needs. All partners, especially FSAI, THL, and TUDelft.
To develop an internet interface for publishing risk assessment results.	Extremely successful.	Our original objectives were rather modest here: the plan was to develop a website where stand-alone assessment models can be published together with detailed descriptions. This was originally set up by Lendac (http://www.beneris.eu). However, we were able to develop a web workspace where whole assessments can be initiated, designed, executed, evaluated, and disseminated, and where stakeholders can participate at any point. The actual website for publishing benefit-risk assessments was first changed to http://beneris.opasnet.org and later to Opasnet (http://en.opasnet.org). There is still a lot of work to be done to be able to actually run assessment models within the workspace. Other projects (e.g. Intarese) are now continuing this work. End results: D37 Internet update, Opasnet. Partners: All partners, especially THL, Lendac.
To develop a method to publish entire benefit-risk models over the Internet using XML.	Extremely successful.	See also above. In the beginning of the project, we were only planning to focus on Analytica models which are in XML format. We developed a tool for automatically converting Analytica model files into model descriptions. Then we developed better practices to describe models directly in the workspace, which made a big leap towards open and collaborative modelling systems. End results: D37 Internet update, Opasnet. Partners: THL, Lendac.
To develop methods to collect feedback from end-users about benefit-risk analyses.	Successful.	A survey functionality was developed to the Opasnet workspace. See e.g. End user evaluation. End results: PollDaddy feedback system, also the commenting system at the end of each Opasnet page ("Post comment"). Partners: THL.
To enhance the availability of existing databases through this interface.	Successful.	Opasnet workspace offers a practical place to describe existing databases (e.g. WHO mortality data, IA Tools). Opasnet Base also offers a practical place to store the data itself, if it is freely available. This kind of work started in Beneris and is now ongoing in other projects. For example, Heimtsa project is using these tools to collect morbidity data for Europe. End results: Opasnet, A list of data sources Partners: DTU, FIN, FSAI, THL.
To disseminate the results and to evaluate the relevance and usefulness of the work done in the project from the perspective of an end-user / authority.	Overall successful, but changes in focus.	Beneris has disseminated project and scientific information on its websites since the beginning. Also D46 End user evaluation looked at this issue. Beneris has disseminated less about the case study results but clearly more about the methodological development than originally thought. The case studies were finalised later than thought, and therefore the time to disseminate results was shorter. On the other hand, it was found out during the project that methodological results are more important than the case studies. Beneris actively discussed with other projects, notably Intarese and Heimtsa. This was a major way to obtain evaluation and comments about the usefulness of Beneris framework and workspace. So, we got a lot of feedback from assessors as end users of the framework, but not very much from authorities or others as end users of Beneris case study assessments. End results: Opasnet, fish case study, D33 Consumer information on case results, D46 End user evaluation Partners: all partners, especially THL, FSAI.

Development of Beneris websites

The first website opened for Beneris was www.beneris.eu, which was opened in the beginning of the project and managed by Lendac. The purpose of the website was to disseminate information about the project, because there were - naturally - not yet results produced by the project. The website had a password-protected area, but this area was used only a little. The idea about a wiki-based website already existed in the beginning of the project, but not yet during the writing of the Description of Work. The possibilities to actually use a wiki site for the needs of the project were unclear in the beginning of the project. Therefore, the development of www.beneris.eu went on for the first year or so of the project.

The project wiki website was opened soon after the project started with the name www.pyrkilo.fi/beneris. The name was later changed to www.opasnet.org/beneris, but this change did not affect the contents in any way. This website was called the "Beneris wiki", as THL was running also other wiki websites for research projects. The Beneris wiki is a password-protected website, and it only contains materials of the Beneris project. One idea was that Beneris wiki would have been a true workspace for the project so that all material would have been available there and contents would have been edited there directly. However, this never worked out in full, as few people in the project had little experience in working with wiki. Also, the functionalities of the website were not very developed in 2006. However, THL made an effort to share at least the most important materials via the Beneris website.

In September 2006, THL opened another wiki website called www.opasnet.org (originally www.pyrkilo.fi, but the name was later changed). Opasnet was an open website for materials that researchers wanted to distribute freely. Some of the public Beneris materials were put directly to Opasnet, while most of it was kept behind the password in the Beneris wiki.

During 2006-2007, several wiki websites were opened for projects like Intarese, Heimtsa, and others. In two years, THL was maintaining 14 different wiki sites, most for a single project. This made no sense. It just caused technical burden, and it also made it difficult to find information. Therefore, THL started to promote the idea of a joint project wiki for all interested research projects. It would be password-protected, but the default would be to show all or at least most project information to researchers in other projects. It was also made possible to hide the information of one project from others, but this was discouraged. Finally, this joint wiki site for several projects, called heande.opasnet.org, was opened in June 2008. Heande became the password-protected part of Opasnet for all projects.

Gradually, THL closed project-specific wikis and moved the information to either Heande or Opasnet. We started from the newest and smallest wikis because those were the easiest to move and the benefit was largest. Beneris project had only a year or so to go, and it contained a large amount of information already. It was thought that it was not worthwhile to move the information while the project was still active. This had the drawback that some protected material were split between the Beneris wiki and Heande. However, the ultimate archive of the Beneris material will be in Heande, and Opasnet for such material that can already be released. This work is slowly going on now, but the main focus is on writing manuscripts based on Beneris results. After the writing period, the Beneris material will be archived, and Beneris wiki will be closed.

The four years from spring 2006 to spring 2010 have been an intensive period of wiki development. The work started with a plain MediaWiki software with no additional help for making benefit-risk assessments. Nor were researchers familiar with the concept of mass collaboration using websites. Beneris was one of the first research projects that seriously pushed the idea of wikis as the tool to do science and assessments. As a result, there is a growing interest in these tools. Also, the tools themselves have become very sophisticated and fit for sharing, collecting, organising, and synthesising scientific information, and disseminating results to and discussing the results with interested stakeholders. Opasnet has grown into real a web workspace for mass collaboration of researchers, assessors, and stakeholders.

Projects currently using or planning to use Opasnet

Follow the links to find more details about the projects.

Projects currently using or planning to use Opasnet or Heande for research.

Project name	Main funder	Topic of project	How Opasnet is used
Intarese	EC	Integrated environmental health impact assessment	Project workspace, distribution of materials within and outside the project.
Heimtsa	EC	Integrated environmental health impact assessment	Project workspace, distribution of materials within and outside the project.
Hiwate	EC	Benefit-risk assessment of drinking water chlorination and microbes	Project workspace, benefit-risk assessments.
Plantlibra	EC	Health risks of plant extracts	Project workspace, risk assessments (project starts in June 2010).
Claih	Academy of Finland	Climate change and health	Project workspace, health impact assessments on climate change, distribution of materials within and outside the project.
Bioher	Academy of Finland	Bioenergy and health	Project workspace, health impact assessments on bioenergy and climate change, distribution of materials within and outside the project.
Hitea	Academy of Finland	Indoor air and health	Project workspace, end-user feedback and surveys.
Altti	Academy of Finland	Indoor air and health	Population survey and feedback.
Bepraribean	European project, several national funders	Benefit-risk assessment for foods	Writing of scientific articles.
Tapas	Coca Cola Company	Health impacts of active transportation	Project workspace.
Hiccups	Academy of Finland	Climate change and health	Writing of application (project not yet funded).