Talk:Composite traffic: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
(Trips per hour scope discussion added) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
====About the focus==== | ====About the focus==== | ||
{{Resolution| | {{Resolution| | ||
Topic = Focus: Total number of trips travelled per hour in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area.| | |||
Statement = Total number of trips travelled per hour in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area| | Statement = Total number of trips travelled per hour in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area| | ||
Outcome = Total number of composite trips travelled per hour in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area| | Outcome = Total number of composite trips travelled per hour in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area| | ||
| Line 13: | Line 12: | ||
::{{Attack| This alternative is almost as short, so the argument does not hold: "Total number of composite trips travelled per hour in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area".}} | ::{{Attack| This alternative is almost as short, so the argument does not hold: "Total number of composite trips travelled per hour in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area".}} | ||
}} | |||
====Scope should not contain assumptions about composite fraction==== | |||
{{Resolution| | |||
Topic = Scope: Trips of one working day, based on year 2000 data. Private car trips as the starting point; 50% of them were assumed to switch to composite traffic.| | |||
Statement = Scope should not contain assumptions about composite fraction.| | |||
Outcome = | | |||
Argumentation ={{Defend| Assumption of composite fraction is of a very detailed operational nature, and it should not be in the scope.}} | |||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 06:26, 12 September 2006
Trips per hour
About the focus
| Fact discussion: . |
|---|
| Opening statement:
Closing statement: Resolution not yet found. (A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
⇤--The focus is ambiguous. It should be mentioned that the trips are only composite trips, not all. Rewording is needed.: . {{{2}}} {{{3}}} (type: truth; paradigms: science: attack)
|
Scope should not contain assumptions about composite fraction
| Fact discussion: . |
|---|
| Opening statement:
Closing statement: Resolution not yet found. (A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
←--Assumption of composite fraction is of a very detailed operational nature, and it should not be in the scope.: . {{{2}}} {{{3}}} (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence)
|