Talk:Population of Helsinki metropolitan area: Difference between revisions
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
|Argumentation = {{defend|#: |There could be other sources of data that can be used to define this variable|--[[User:Eva Kunseler|Eva Kunseler]] 15:31, 18 February 2009 (EET)--[[User:Dvienneau|Dvienneau]] 15:42, 18 February 2009 (EET)}}}} | |Argumentation = {{defend|#: |There could be other sources of data that can be used to define this variable|--[[User:Eva Kunseler|Eva Kunseler]] 15:31, 18 February 2009 (EET)--[[User:Dvienneau|Dvienneau]] 15:42, 18 February 2009 (EET)}}}} | ||
{{discussion | |||
|Dispute= Validity of Statistics FI population projections | |||
{{attack|1: |How can we assess the validity of these projections? Can we assign errors/confidence intervals to these projections? |--[[User:Dvienneau|Dvienneau]] 14:06, 18 February 2009 (EET)}} | |Outcome= Under discussion (to be changed when a conclusion is found) | ||
|Argumentation ={{attack|1: |How can we assess the validity of these projections? Can we assign errors/confidence intervals to these projections? |--[[User:Dvienneau|Dvienneau]] 14:06, 18 February 2009 (EET)}} | |||
{{attack|2: |How sensitive are [[ Assessment on impacts of emission trading on city-level (ET-CL) ]] assessment results to uncertainty in the population projections |--[[User:Dvienneau|Dvienneau]] 14:06, 18 February 2009 (EET)}} | {{attack|2: |How sensitive are [[ Assessment on impacts of emission trading on city-level (ET-CL) ]] assessment results to uncertainty in the population projections |--[[User:Dvienneau|Dvienneau]] 14:06, 18 February 2009 (EET)}} | ||
{{defend|#: |You might want to contact Statistics Finland to have them explain how they derive these numbers and formulate your uncertainty interval | |||
}} | |||
You might want to contact Statistics Finland to have them explain how they derive these numbers and formulate your uncertainty interval | }} | ||
Revision as of 13:50, 18 February 2009
Geographic Extent
| Fact discussion: . |
|---|
| Opening statement:
Closing statement: Resolution not yet found. (A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
←--1:: . Assessment includes only the Helsinki Met Area, and these boundaries should be used to 'clip' higher resolution population data (e.g. EEA grid) if used --Dvienneau 14:57, 17 February 2009 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence) ←--#:: . The adminstrative boundaries define the study area indeed. The population data could be organised in different grids, because this provides more detailed information --Eva Kunseler 15:08, 18 February 2009 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence) |
Source of data
| Fact discussion: . |
|---|
| Opening statement:
Closing statement: Resolution not yet found. (A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
←--#:: . There could be other sources of data that can be used to define this variable --Eva Kunseler 15:31, 18 February 2009 (EET)--Dvienneau 15:42, 18 February 2009 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence)
|
| Fact discussion: . |
|---|
| Opening statement:
Closing statement: Resolution not yet found. (A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
⇤--1:: . How can we assess the validity of these projections? Can we assign errors/confidence intervals to these projections? --Dvienneau 14:06, 18 February 2009 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: attack) ⇤--2:: . How sensitive are Assessment on impacts of emission trading on city-level (ET-CL) assessment results to uncertainty in the population projections --Dvienneau 14:06, 18 February 2009 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: attack) ←--#:: . You might want to contact Statistics Finland to have them explain how they derive these numbers and formulate your uncertainty interval {{{3}}} (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence) |