Talk:Open assessment method: Difference between revisions
(resolution) |
m (Talk:Open assessment moved to Talk:Open assessment method: The page is a method page and this should be seen. There is a need for an encyclopedia article about open assessment as well.) |
(No difference)
| |
Revision as of 21:36, 6 March 2009
| Fact discussion: . |
|---|
| Opening statement:
Closing statement: Resolution not yet found. (A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
←--#1:: . We should rename Open Risk Assessment into Open Assessment as it has a wider field of application than just Risk Assessment. --Alexandra Kuhn 17:06, 6 March 2008 (EET), --Jouni 00:59, 8 March 2008 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence) ⇤--#2:: . OA does not refer to environmental health impact assessment (what heande is about). It can therefore refer to an assessment of any issue what so ever (e.g. impacts of acid fall-out on lichen growth). But yes, it is however reasonable to seek for a wider field of application. Something similar as EIA (environmental impact assessment) should be chosen. How about OHIA? --Anna Karjalainen 11.45, 7 May 2008 (type: truth; paradigms: science: attack) |