Health effects of Baltic herring and salmon: a benefit-risk assessment: Difference between revisions
(placeholder with instructions) |
(technical info updated) |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
|authors=Jouni T. Tuomisto, Arja Asikainen, Päivi Meriläinen, Päivi Haapasaari}} | |authors=Jouni T. Tuomisto, Arja Asikainen, Päivi Meriläinen, Päivi Haapasaari}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
'''Health effects of Baltic herring and salmon: a benefit-risk assessment''' is a research manuscript about the [[Goherr assessment]] performed on the BONUS GOHERR project between 2015-2018. | '''Health effects of Baltic herring and salmon: a benefit-risk assessment''' is a research manuscript about the [[Goherr assessment]] performed on the BONUS GOHERR project between 2015-2018. The manuscript is to be submitted to BMC Public Health [https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/submission-guidelines/preparing-your-manuscript/research-article]. | ||
== Title page == | == Title page == | ||
* Title: Health effects of Baltic herring and salmon: a benefit-risk assessment | |||
* Authors: | |||
*: Jouni T. Tuomisto, jouni.tuomisto[]thl.fi, (corresponding author), National Institute for Health and Welfare, Kuopio, Finland. | |||
*: Arja Asikainen, arja.asikainen[]thl.fi, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Kuopio, Finland. | |||
*: Päivi Meriläinen, paivi.merilainen@thl.fi, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Kuopio, Finland. | |||
*: Päivi Haapasaari, paivi.haapasaari[]helsinki.fi, University of Helsinki, Finland. | |||
== Abstract == | |||
The Abstract should not exceed 350 words. | |||
'''Background:''' the context and purpose of the study | |||
'''Methods:''' how the study was performed and statistical tests used | |||
'''Results:''' the main findings | |||
'''Conclusions:''' brief summary and potential implications | |||
== Keywords == | == Keywords == | ||
Fish consumption, dioxins, methylmercury, benefit-risk assessment, health impact, sperm concentration, tooth defect, intelligence quotient, knowledge crystal, food recommendation. | |||
== Background == | == Background == | ||
Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
This should state clearly the main conclusions and provide an explanation of the importance and relevance of the study reported. | This should state clearly the main conclusions and provide an explanation of the importance and relevance of the study reported. | ||
List of abbreviations | |||
== List of abbreviations == | |||
If abbreviations are used in the text they should be defined in the text at first use, and a list of abbreviations should be provided. | If abbreviations are used in the text they should be defined in the text at first use, and a list of abbreviations should be provided. | ||
== Declarations == | == Declarations == | ||
=== Ethics approval and consent to participate === | === Ethics approval and consent to participate === | ||
An online survey was performed to adult consumers in Denmark, Estonia, Finland, and Sweden by Taloustutkimus Ltd. We asked about fish eating habits but not about health or other sensitive issues. We did not ask or collect identity information of the respondents, except age, gender, and country, which were used for classification in analyses. The survey did not involve any interventions. Due to these reasons, there was no need for ethical approval according to the THL guidance. | |||
=== Consent for publication === | |||
Not applicable. | |||
If your manuscript contains any individual person’s data in any form (including any individual details, images or videos), consent for publication must be obtained from that person, or in the case of children, their parent or legal guardian. All presentations of case reports must have consent for publication. | ''If your manuscript contains any individual person’s data in any form (including any individual details, images or videos), consent for publication must be obtained from that person, or in the case of children, their parent or legal guardian. All presentations of case reports must have consent for publication. | ||
You can use your institutional consent form or our consent form if you prefer. You should not send the form to us on submission, but we may request to see a copy at any stage (including after publication). | ''You can use your institutional consent form or our consent form if you prefer. You should not send the form to us on submission, but we may request to see a copy at any stage (including after publication). | ||
See our editorial policies for more information on consent for publication. | ''See our editorial policies for more information on consent for publication. | ||
If your manuscript does not contain data from any individual person, please state “Not applicable” in this section. | ''If your manuscript does not contain data from any individual person, please state “Not applicable” in this section. | ||
=== Availability of data and materials === | === Availability of data and materials === | ||
The whole benefit-risk assessment was performed online at http://en.opasnet.org/w/Goherr_assessment, and all details (including data, code, results, descriptions, and discussions) are openly available, except for the personal data from the consumer survey. The consumer survey data was converted to and published as synthetic data, i.e. data that does not represent any real individuals but that has similar statistical properties as the actual data. | |||
The datasets generated | The datasets generated and analysed during the current study, together with the other material mentioned above, are available in the IDA research data repository, [###PERSISTENT WEB LINK TO DATASETS] | ||
=== Competing interests === | === Competing interests === | ||
The authors declare that they have no competing interests. | |||
=== Funding === | === Funding === | ||
This work resulted from the BONUS GOHERR project (Integrated governance of Baltic herring and salmon stocks involving stakeholders, 2015-2018) that was supported by BONUS (Art 185), funded jointly by the EU, the Academy of Finland and the Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning. | |||
=== Authors' contributions === | === Authors' contributions === | ||
JT planned the assessment design, performed most of the analyses, and wrote the first draft of the manuscript based on input from other authors. PH coordinated the project and participated in designing and linking of this work to other parts of the project. AA designed and performed the questionnaire study. PM participated in the discussions about the design and interpretation of results. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. | |||
=== Acknowledgements === | === Acknowledgements === | ||
We thank all BONUS GOHERR researchers and stakeholder meeting participants, who participated in lively discussions about the importance of Baltic fisheries management and health. | |||
=== Authors' information === | === Authors' information === | ||
No specific information. | |||
== Endnotes == | == Endnotes == | ||
Line 172: | Line 112: | ||
== References == | == References == | ||
<references/> | |||
Examples of the Vancouver reference style are shown below. | Examples of the Vancouver reference style are shown below. |
Revision as of 09:43, 18 November 2018
This page is a nugget.
The page identifier is Op_en7919 | |
---|---|
Moderator:Jouni (see all) | |
| |
Upload data
|
Unlike most other pages in Opasnet, the nuggets have predetermined authors, and you cannot freely edit the contents. Note! If you want to protect the nugget you've created from unauthorized editing click here |
Health effects of Baltic herring and salmon: a benefit-risk assessment is a research manuscript about the Goherr assessment performed on the BONUS GOHERR project between 2015-2018. The manuscript is to be submitted to BMC Public Health [2].
Title page
- Title: Health effects of Baltic herring and salmon: a benefit-risk assessment
- Authors:
- Jouni T. Tuomisto, jouni.tuomisto[]thl.fi, (corresponding author), National Institute for Health and Welfare, Kuopio, Finland.
- Arja Asikainen, arja.asikainen[]thl.fi, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Kuopio, Finland.
- Päivi Meriläinen, paivi.merilainen@thl.fi, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Kuopio, Finland.
- Päivi Haapasaari, paivi.haapasaari[]helsinki.fi, University of Helsinki, Finland.
Abstract
The Abstract should not exceed 350 words.
Background: the context and purpose of the study
Methods: how the study was performed and statistical tests used
Results: the main findings
Conclusions: brief summary and potential implications
Keywords
Fish consumption, dioxins, methylmercury, benefit-risk assessment, health impact, sperm concentration, tooth defect, intelligence quotient, knowledge crystal, food recommendation.
Background
The Background section should explain the background to the study, its aims, a summary of the existing literature and why this study was necessary or its contribution to the field.
Methods
The methods section should include:
the aim, design and setting of the study the characteristics of participants or description of materials a clear description of all processes, interventions and comparisons. Generic drug names should generally be used. When proprietary brands are used in research, include the brand names in parentheses the type of statistical analysis used, including a power calculation if appropriate
Results
This should include the findings of the study including, if appropriate, results of statistical analysis which must be included either in the text or as tables and figures.
Discussion
This section should discuss the implications of the findings in context of existing research and highlight limitations of the study.
Conclusions
This should state clearly the main conclusions and provide an explanation of the importance and relevance of the study reported.
List of abbreviations
If abbreviations are used in the text they should be defined in the text at first use, and a list of abbreviations should be provided.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
An online survey was performed to adult consumers in Denmark, Estonia, Finland, and Sweden by Taloustutkimus Ltd. We asked about fish eating habits but not about health or other sensitive issues. We did not ask or collect identity information of the respondents, except age, gender, and country, which were used for classification in analyses. The survey did not involve any interventions. Due to these reasons, there was no need for ethical approval according to the THL guidance.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
If your manuscript contains any individual person’s data in any form (including any individual details, images or videos), consent for publication must be obtained from that person, or in the case of children, their parent or legal guardian. All presentations of case reports must have consent for publication.
You can use your institutional consent form or our consent form if you prefer. You should not send the form to us on submission, but we may request to see a copy at any stage (including after publication).
See our editorial policies for more information on consent for publication.
If your manuscript does not contain data from any individual person, please state “Not applicable” in this section.
Availability of data and materials
The whole benefit-risk assessment was performed online at http://en.opasnet.org/w/Goherr_assessment, and all details (including data, code, results, descriptions, and discussions) are openly available, except for the personal data from the consumer survey. The consumer survey data was converted to and published as synthetic data, i.e. data that does not represent any real individuals but that has similar statistical properties as the actual data.
The datasets generated and analysed during the current study, together with the other material mentioned above, are available in the IDA research data repository, [###PERSISTENT WEB LINK TO DATASETS]
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Funding
This work resulted from the BONUS GOHERR project (Integrated governance of Baltic herring and salmon stocks involving stakeholders, 2015-2018) that was supported by BONUS (Art 185), funded jointly by the EU, the Academy of Finland and the Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning.
Authors' contributions
JT planned the assessment design, performed most of the analyses, and wrote the first draft of the manuscript based on input from other authors. PH coordinated the project and participated in designing and linking of this work to other parts of the project. AA designed and performed the questionnaire study. PM participated in the discussions about the design and interpretation of results. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Acknowledgements
We thank all BONUS GOHERR researchers and stakeholder meeting participants, who participated in lively discussions about the importance of Baltic fisheries management and health.
Authors' information
No specific information.
Endnotes
Endnotes should be designated within the text using a superscript lowercase letter and all notes (along with their corresponding letter) should be included in the Endnotes section. Please format this section in a paragraph rather than a list.
References
Examples of the Vancouver reference style are shown below.
See our editorial policies for author guidance on good citation practice
Web links and URLs: All web links and URLs, including links to the authors' own websites, should be given a reference number and included in the reference list rather than within the text of the manuscript. They should be provided in full, including both the title of the site and the URL, as well as the date the site was accessed, in the following format: The Mouse Tumor Biology Database. http://tumor.informatics.jax.org/mtbwi/index.do. Accessed 20 May 2013. If an author or group of authors can clearly be associated with a web link, such as for weblogs, then they should be included in the reference.
Example reference style:
Article within a journal
Smith JJ. The world of science. Am J Sci. 1999;36:234-5.
Article within a journal (no page numbers)
Rohrmann S, Overvad K, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB, Jakobsen MU, Egeberg R, Tjønneland A, et al. Meat consumption and mortality - results from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. BMC Medicine. 2013;11:63.
Article within a journal by DOI
Slifka MK, Whitton JL. Clinical implications of dysregulated cytokine production. Dig J Mol Med. 2000; doi:10.1007/s801090000086.
Article within a journal supplement
Frumin AM, Nussbaum J, Esposito M. Functional asplenia: demonstration of splenic activity by bone marrow scan. Blood 1979;59 Suppl 1:26-32.
Book chapter, or an article within a book
Wyllie AH, Kerr JFR, Currie AR. Cell death: the significance of apoptosis. In: Bourne GH, Danielli JF, Jeon KW, editors. International review of cytology. London: Academic; 1980. p. 251-306.
OnlineFirst chapter in a series (without a volume designation but with a DOI)
Saito Y, Hyuga H. Rate equation approaches to amplification of enantiomeric excess and chiral symmetry breaking. Top Curr Chem. 2007. doi:10.1007/128_2006_108.
Complete book, authored
Blenkinsopp A, Paxton P. Symptoms in the pharmacy: a guide to the management of common illness. 3rd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Science; 1998.
Online document
Doe J. Title of subordinate document. In: The dictionary of substances and their effects. Royal Society of Chemistry. 1999. http://www.rsc.org/dose/title of subordinate document. Accessed 15 Jan 1999.
Online database
Healthwise Knowledgebase. US Pharmacopeia, Rockville. 1998. http://www.healthwise.org. Accessed 21 Sept 1998.
Supplementary material/private homepage
Doe J. Title of supplementary material. 2000. http://www.privatehomepage.com. Accessed 22 Feb 2000.
University site
Doe, J: Title of preprint. http://www.uni-heidelberg.de/mydata.html (1999). Accessed 25 Dec 1999.
FTP site
Doe, J: Trivial HTTP, RFC2169. ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2169.txt (1999). Accessed 12 Nov 1999.
Organization site
ISSN International Centre: The ISSN register. http://www.issn.org (2006). Accessed 20 Feb 2007.
Dataset with persistent identifier
Zheng L-Y, Guo X-S, He B, Sun L-J, Peng Y, Dong S-S, et al. Genome data from sweet and grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor). GigaScience Database. 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/100012.
Figures, tables and additional files
See General formatting guidelines for information on how to format figures, tables and additional files.