Goherr/WP3: Difference between revisions

From Opasnet
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
'''Rationale'''
'''Rationale'''


In WP3, different stakeholder groups will be involved in defining and prioritizing management objectives for Baltic salmon and herring. Emphasis will be given to stakeholders’ views and objectives related to the impacts of Baltic fish on human health. Achieving the objectives in the long term is influenced by a myriad of factors, most of which relate to different political, economic, social, technical, climate change-related, etc. conditions in the future. For addressing these factors, a scenario analysis is done by organizing workshops for eliciting expert knowledge for building scenarios for 1) eutrophication, 2) dioxin input, 3) salmon policy, and 4) the use of herring catches, in the Baltic Sea up to year 2040.
The Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) aims at ensuring that marine resources are exploited in a sustainable
environmental, economic, and social manner. During the reform of the CFP, the need to clearly define and prioritise ecological, social and economic objectives was highlihted. Drawing from this, the overall aim of WP3 is to identify, prioritize and explore, different management objectives for Baltic salmon and herring.
 
This is done by involving relevant stakeholder groups (e.g. fishers, consumers, eNGOs, authorities, scientists) in defining and prioritizing biological, social, economic, and human health related objectives for integrated salmon and herring policy as well as for identifying different pathways to meet these objectives. Achieving the objectives in the long term is influenced by a number of factors, most of which relate to different political, economic, social, technical, and environmental (etc.) conditions in the future. For addressing these factors, a scenario analysis is applied to a) build four integrative scenarios for the future of Baltic salmon and herring regarding threats, state, impacts and governance responses, and; b) build scenarios up to year 2040 related to 1) eutrophication and 2) dioxin releases, 3) the use of Baltic herring, and 4) salmon policy. For the Decision Support Tool (WP6) the probability of materialization of each identified scenario will be estimated.
 


'''Objectives'''
'''Objectives'''


1. Define objectives for integrated salmon and herring policy
1. Identify, define and prioritize objectives for integrated salmon and herring policy


2. Define pathways for reaching the objectives
2. Define pathways for reaching the objectives


3. Build exploratory future scenarios for eutrophication and dioxin input in the Baltic Sea, and for the use of Baltic herring and salmon
3. Build four integrative scenarios for the future of Baltic salmon and herring regarding threats, state, impacts and governance responses
 
4. Build exploratory scenarios up to year 2040 related for eutrophication, dioxin releases, the use of Baltic herring, and salmon policy
 
 
More information:
 
http://en.opasnet.org/w/Goherr:_WP3_Scenarios_and_management_objectives

Revision as of 07:31, 10 June 2015


This is an archived version of a previous Goherr website.

Goherr wiki main page Official Goherr website
Overview
Consortium · Contacts
Workpackages:
WP1 · WP2 · WP3 · WP4 ·
WP5 · WP6 · WP7
Deliverables
Publications
Events
News


Goherr assessment
Project page











WP3: Scenarios and management objectives

Rationale

The Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) aims at ensuring that marine resources are exploited in a sustainable environmental, economic, and social manner. During the reform of the CFP, the need to clearly define and prioritise ecological, social and economic objectives was highlihted. Drawing from this, the overall aim of WP3 is to identify, prioritize and explore, different management objectives for Baltic salmon and herring.

This is done by involving relevant stakeholder groups (e.g. fishers, consumers, eNGOs, authorities, scientists) in defining and prioritizing biological, social, economic, and human health related objectives for integrated salmon and herring policy as well as for identifying different pathways to meet these objectives. Achieving the objectives in the long term is influenced by a number of factors, most of which relate to different political, economic, social, technical, and environmental (etc.) conditions in the future. For addressing these factors, a scenario analysis is applied to a) build four integrative scenarios for the future of Baltic salmon and herring regarding threats, state, impacts and governance responses, and; b) build scenarios up to year 2040 related to 1) eutrophication and 2) dioxin releases, 3) the use of Baltic herring, and 4) salmon policy. For the Decision Support Tool (WP6) the probability of materialization of each identified scenario will be estimated.


Objectives

1. Identify, define and prioritize objectives for integrated salmon and herring policy

2. Define pathways for reaching the objectives

3. Build four integrative scenarios for the future of Baltic salmon and herring regarding threats, state, impacts and governance responses

4. Build exploratory scenarios up to year 2040 related for eutrophication, dioxin releases, the use of Baltic herring, and salmon policy


More information:

http://en.opasnet.org/w/Goherr:_WP3_Scenarios_and_management_objectives