Talk:Climate change policies in Helsinki: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(placeholder) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
* Food issues are underrepresented in climate discussions although food is a major emission source. | * Food issues are underrepresented in climate discussions although food is a major emission source. | ||
* District heating by nuclear energy should be considered in Helsinki. | * District heating by nuclear energy should be considered in Helsinki. | ||
* The CO<sub>2</sub> emission factors of biofuels should be reconsidered: the assumption of zero emissions is not true. | |||
Revision as of 12:55, 25 March 2015
Discussions about climate change policies in Helsinki
Possible topics:
- City level climate change mitigation is useless because success depends on international treaties.
- Climate change policies should consider health impacts and other collateral impacts as they may be significant.
- Climate change adaptation is more important than mitigation on city level.
- Citizens have a key role in implementing city climate policies.
- Food issues are underrepresented in climate discussions although food is a major emission source.
- District heating by nuclear energy should be considered in Helsinki.
- The CO2 emission factors of biofuels should be reconsidered: the assumption of zero emissions is not true.