Talk:Open science and research roadmap 2014–2017: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 11:57, 28 January 2015

GovLab practices in Opasnet (Opaslab)

Instructions for application:

Hakukuulutus Avoimen tieteen ja tutkimuksen edistäminen sekä avoimuuden hyödyntäminen innovaatiotoiminnassa [1]
Academy instructions

Abstract

GovLab practices in Opasnet (Opaslab) is a research and development project that aims to combine lessons learned from three important lines of work. They have each worked in different areas, but their synergism is what makes this project unique:

Opasnet is a web workspace for making science-based impact assessments and models to support societal decision making. The web workspace is designed to implement open policy practice, a systematic method to produce relevant information for decision support.
The GovLab is an organisation within the New York University developing new practices for open governance. Their key method is to test ideas in practice to see what works.
Innovillage is a project within the National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL) in Finland. It aims at collecting, developing, and sharing good practices within the health sector.

Research plan

Project details

Name: Govlab and Opasnet practices in Finnish science and policy (OPASLAB)
Principal investigator: Jouni Tuomisto, chief researcher, THL
Duration: 7 months during 2015-2016
Site of research: National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Kuopio and The Government Lab, New York, USA.

Background

   Significance of the project in relation to current knowledge: How is the project linked to previous international and national research? How will the project advance or reconstruct previous research?
   How is the project linked to previous research by the PI/the research team, or to some other research?
   If the call has a specific objective (e.g. research programme calls): How does the proposed research match the call and its objectives?

The Ministry of Education and Culture of Finland has developed a roadmap for open science http://en.opasnet.org/w/Open_science_roadmap (with my comments in blue and green)

They have also produced a related open science and research handbook (draft 1.0 available): http://openscience.fi/handbook

We in THL have developed a method called open policy practice http://en.opasnet.org/w/OPP which is based on the idea of open information processes. The Opasnet website was developed as a workspace where open policy practice can be practically implemented.

Objectives and expected results

The objectives of this project are to:

bring the open policy practice method into a new setting in the GovLab and test for its applicability,
develop open policy practice further based on lessons learned in the GovLab,
describe the new practices in Innovillage as a platform to share the practices further,
implement the new practices with CSC - IT center for science in practical cases in Finnish governance.

   Objectives of the research
   Hypotheses
   Expected scientific and societal impacts of the research
   Potential for scientific breakthroughs and for the regeneration of science and research
   Applicability and utilisation potential of the research results
   Critical points for success, alternative implementation strategies
   Publication plan: publishing of research results, dissemination and communication to the scientific community, end-users and the general public

Project plan

Research methods and material, support from research environment

   Research methods, described so as to explain how they will contribute to answering the research questions/confirming the hypotheses, or how they will support the chosen approach
   Research material
   Data management plan, describing:
   -       how the research data will be obtained
   -       how the data will be used
   -       how the data will be stored and protected
   -       how subsequent use of the data will be facilitated, and how the data will be made available to others
   -       how the rights of ownership and use to the data are distributed.
   What kind of tangible support will the project receive from local, national and international research environments?
   Use of research infrastructures, description of how the project benefits from such use (the infrastructures are also entered in the online application under Infrastructures)

But the development work by the ministry and the work by us has not converged before, and this is the time to do it. So, I suggest that

I will merge the ideas from the handbook (or handbook version 2, which should be published soon) and open policy practice into one coherent open science and policy handbook (let's call it version 3),
possibly update some functionalities in Opasnet, if the handbook v3 warrants that,
then come to New York where I will explore the relevance of the handbook v3+Opasnet to your civic tech/governance-oriented research and advisory work in several policy areas, health care primary among them,
at the same time, I will explore the relevance of your project-based innovations, both analytical and technological, as well as those of individuals and groups in our extended networks, to the further development of handbook v3+Opasnet,
back in Finland, I will produce a draft handbook v4+Opasnet (with maybe some additional functionalities) to the ministry for review and implementation.

Ethical issues

Sensitive data, patients or animals are not handled in the project. There are no ethical issues to be concerned of.

Implementation and budget

Implementation: schedule, budget, distribution of work

   Schedule for the research
   Justifications for the total cost estimate specified on the application, by type of expenditure (budget table with justifications). Costs that do not pass through the books of the site of the research must not be included in the total project costs.
   Names, tasks and salary costs (with justifications) of project staff. If the names are not known, enter N.N.
   In research projects (Academy Projects, projects in research programmes), also include:
   -       an estimate of the PI’s working hours on the project
   -       if funding (max. 12 months) is applied for to cover the PI’s salary: give clear, research-specific reasons for the salary
   -       if the PI does not have a permanent employment relationship: include a salary plan for the PI for the funding period

Budget

The overhead is 15 % for the projects funded by the Ministry of Education and Culture. The social security costs are 57 % in THL.

Person-months 2015-2016(pm)
Obs	Name	Salary	2015/9	2015/10-12	2016/1-3	2016/4-6	Description
1	J.T.	5500	0.25	2.25	0.75	0.75	Full time during NY visit, 25 % otherwise.
2	A.A.	4000	0	1	1	1	33 % of full-time employment

Other costs(€)
Obs	Cost type	2015/9	2015/10-12	2016/1-3	2016/4-6	Description
1	Travel costs	0	5000	0	1500	2015: 2-month trip to NY, 2016: 1-week trip to NY

+ Show code - Hide code

library(OpasnetUtils)

dat <- opbase.data("Op_en7018", subset = "Person-months 2015-2016")
dat$Obs <- NULL
htkk <- Ovariable("htkk", data = dat[colnames(dat) != "Salary"])
muut <- Ovariable("muut", data = opbase.data("Op_en7018", subset = "Other costs"))
muut@data$Obs <- NULL

palkka <- Ovariable("palkka", data = dat[colnames(dat) != "Result"])
colnames(palkka@data)[colnames(palkka@data) == "Salary"] <- "Result"

oprint(htkk)

palkka <- oapply(htkk * palkka, INDEX = "Period", FUN = sum)
sk <- palkka * sk
yk <- (palkka + sk) * yk

selite <- Ovariable(
	output = data.frame(Cost.type = "Salary", Result = 1), 
	marginal = c(TRUE, FALSE)
)
budjetti <- palkka * selite
selite@output$Kustannuslaji <- "Social security costs"

budjetti@output <- orbind(budjetti@output, (sk * selite)@output)
selite@output$Kustannuslaji <- "Overhead"
budjetti@output <- orbind(budjetti@output, (yk * selite)@output)
budjetti@output <- orbind(budjetti@output, ( 1 * muut)@output)
oprint(budjetti)
oprint(oapply(budjetti, INDEX = c("Period", "Cost.type"), FUN = sum), digits = 0)
oprint(oapply(budjetti, INDEX = c("Period"), FUN = sum), digits = 0)
oprint(oapply(budjetti, cols = c("Name", "Period", "Cost.type"), FUN = sum), digits = 0)
oprint(oapply(budjetti, INDEX = character(), FUN = sum), digits = 0)

Research team, collaboration

Jouni Tuomisto (THL), Dr.Med.Sci., adjunct professor, chief researcher, principal investigator: Tuomisto has over 20 years of research expertise in environmental health issues such as dioxins, air pollution, and toxicology. In addition, he has worked more than 10 years on risk assessment, impact assessment, and decision support. He is the main developer of open assessment, open policy practice, and Opasnet web workspace. He has served in several national expert panels.
Arja Asikainen (THL), Ph.D., researcher: Asikainen has over 10 years of expertise in environmental and environmental health research and impact modelling. Her main areas of expertise include fine particles and other air pollutants, exposure assessment, and burden of disease.
Beth Simone Noveck (GovLab), professor of law: Noveck directs The Governance Lab and its MacArthur Research Network on Opening Governance. She is Global Network Visiting Professor at New York University, and she was formerly a Visiting Professor at the Graduate School of Public Service and a visiting professor at the MIT Media Lab. She served in the White House as the first United States Deputy Chief Technology Officer and director of the White House Open Government Initiative (2009-2011). UK Prime Minister David Cameron appointed her senior advisor for Open Government, and she served on the Obama-Biden transition team.
Alan Kantrow (GovLab), Ph.D., Chief Learning and Communications Officer: Prior to joining The GovLab, Alan was Managing Partner of Alan Kantrow LLC, where he provided advice on strategy, organization, innovation, communication, and knowledge management to corporations, colleges and universities, and government entities focused on educational and economic development in many different parts of the world. He is also a Senior Advisor to HCD Global in Shanghai.

THL is a government research and expert institute in Finland. Its environmental health part in Kuopio is a leading research unit in its field. Environmental health assessments and policy support are its key areas of activity.

The GovLab strives to improve people’s lives by changing how we govern. The GovLab designs and tests technology, policy and strategies for fostering more open and collaborative approaches to strengthen the ability of people and institutions to work together to solve problems, make decisions, resolve conflict and govern themselves more effectively and legitimately.

Mobility plan

   Description of possible researcher mobility from Finland (or to Finland or between organisations in Finland), including information on the objectives and duration of visits and on whether the visits have been agreed. Also justify how the visits or work periods elsewhere contribute to the implementation of the research plan. (This information is also entered on the online application under Mobility.

References

Invitation letter

We are aware of your work in developing open policy practice and the related Opasnet web workspace. These are interesting demonstrations of open science and democracy. We are also aware of your interest in evaluating these against the Open Science and Research Roadmap published by the The Ministry of Education and Culture of Finland, as well as your interest in developing these ideas and practices further.

As you and I have discussed, our mutual expectation is that, during your time with us, you will explore the relevance of the ideas and functionality embedded in the Roadmap, open policy practice, and Opasnet to our civic tech/governance-oriented research and advisory work in several policy areas, health care primary among them. At the same time, you will explore the relevance of our project-based innovations, both analytical and technological, as well as those of individuals and groups in our extended networks, to the further development of Opasnet, open policy practice, and open science in Finland.

We will be happy to provide you with office space, technical support, wireless access, and an eager group of interested and interesting colleagues. We will not, however, be responsible for your compensation, benefits, living arrangements, or travel expenses.

Metadata about document GovLab practices in Opasnet (in Finnish) help
Nimi: GovLab practices in Opasnet Tehtäväryhmä: 6.00.01.08 Tehtäväryhmän nimi: Rahoitushakemus Rekisteröinti: Vastuualue: Vaikutusarviointiyksikkö Vastuuhenkilö: Jouni Tuomisto Luotu: 20.1.2015 Säilytysaika: 15 v Säilytysmuoto: Sähköinen Julkisuus: Julkinen Suojeluluokka: 2 (tutkimuksellisista, juridisista tai taloudellisista syistä suojeltavat asiakirjat) Lisätiedot: Pysyvä linkki: [2] Hyväksyntä: Ei ole

Hakemus

Hakijan nimi / Sökandens namn (yhteisön rekisteröity nimi / registrerat namn på sammanslutning) *

Terveyden ja hyvinvoinnin laitos

Nimilyhenne / Namnförkortning

THL

Hakijan kotikunta /Sökandens hemkommun

Helsinki

Yhteisön yhteyshenkilö /Sammanslutningens kontaktperson

Jouni Tuomisto

Hakijayhteisön Y-tunnus/ Sammanslutningens FO-nummer

2229500-6

PRH: n yhdistys-, säätiö- tai kaupparekisterin rek.nro ja ensirek.pvm / Förenings-, stiftelse- eller handelsregistrets reg.nr och första reg.dag (PRS)

1.1.2009

Lähiosoite / Näradress

Mannerheimintie 166 / PL 30

Postinumero / Postnummer, Postitoimipaikka / Postanstalt

00271 Helsinki

Sähköpostiosoite / E-postadress

jouni.tuomisto.at.thl.fi

Puhelin / Telefon työ / tjänst Telefax

029-5246305

Haettava määrä euroina / Belopp som söks i euro

Hakijan pankkitili / Sökandens bankkonto ** IBAN BIC

Pohjola Pankki Oyj IBAN:FI84 5000 0120 2506 82 BIC:OKOYFIHH

Hakemuksen aihealue (ilmoituksesta tai hakuohjeista www.minedu.fi) Ansökningens ämnesområde (från annons eller ansökningsanvisningar www.minedu.fi)

Erityisavustus tiede- ja korkeakoulupolitiikan kehittämishankkeisiin

Valtionavustuslaji (kts. seuraava sivu) / Slag av statsunderstöd (se nästa sida): yleisavustus / allmänt understöd ___; erityisavustus / specialunderstöd _X_

Hankkeen nimi / Projektets namn

Hankkeen suunniteltu alkamis- ja päättymisaika / Datum för projektets planerade början och slut

1.9.2015 - 30.6.2016

Avustuksen käyttötarkoitus (voidaan jatkaa liitteessä) / Understödets ändamål (kan fortsättas i bilaga)

Liitteet

Avustettavaa hanketta koskeva suunnitelma. Toimintasuunnitelmasta tulee käydä ilmi hankkeen toiminta-ajatus, keskeiset kehittämiskohteet hankekaudella (rahoituskausi 2015-2016) sekä tavoitteet vaikuttavuudelle vuosina 2015-2017.
Erittely hankkeen kokonaiskustannuksista ja hankkeesta saatavista tuloista sekä arvio niiden ajoittumisesta neljännesvuoden tarkkuudella. Muut samaa tarkoitusta varten saadut ja haetut avustukset.
Selvitys nimenkirjoitusoikeudesta (esim. yhdistys-, säätiö tai kaupparekisteriote)
hakijayhteisön toimintakertomus tai muu vastaava selvitys edelliseltä tilikaudelta,
yhteisön tuloslaskelma, tase ja tilintarkastuskertomus edelliseltä tilikaudelta.
Mikäli hakija ei ole saanut opetus- ja kulttuuriministeriöltä avustusta aikaisemmin tulee hakemukseen liittää tiedot hakijayhteisöstä: yhdistysrekisteriote, yhteisön säännöt, yhteisön hallituksen/johtokunnan kokoonpano, jäsenten lukumäärä (henkilöjäsenet ja yhteisöjäsenet).