Assessment of the health impacts of H1N1 vaccination: Difference between revisions

From Opasnet
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
Line 23: Line 23:
*Fraction of population belonging to a risk group
*Fraction of population belonging to a risk group
*Length of swine flu
*Length of swine flu
*[[Narcolepsy in Finland]]
*[[AH1N1 cases in Finland]]


;Indicators
;Indicators
*[[Narcolepsy in Finland]]
*DALYs from narcolepsy caused by vaccination
*[[AH1N1 cases in Finland]]
*DALYs from having swine flu (~staying at home for 5 days)
*DALYs from deaths caused by swine flu


=== Formula ===
=== Formula ===

Revision as of 13:16, 6 April 2011



Scope

What was the overall health impact of the H1N1 vaccination in Finland in 2009-2010? Given current knowledge, which was the better decision between vaccinating as happened versus vaccinating no-one?

Definition

Causal diagram.
Variables
Indicators
  • DALYs from narcolepsy caused by vaccination
  • DALYs from having swine flu (~staying at home for 5 days)
  • DALYs from deaths caused by swine flu

Formula

  • Basic model
    • Uncertainties of ERF of vaccine on narcolepsy, fraction of all cases represented by lab confirmed cases and probability of catching swine flu are implemented.

+ Show code

Result

  • From initial results it would appear like swine flu is more significant than narcolepsy in terms of DALYs.
    • Vaccinating as planned would result in approximately 2500 DALYs due to swine flu and narcolepsy combined.
    • Vaccinating no-one would result in approximately 4000 DALYs due to swine flu.

Results

Conclusions

See also

References