Attribute: Difference between revisions
m (template added) |
(updated) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{variable| | {{variable|Universal object}} | ||
<section begin=glossary /> | <section begin=glossary /> | ||
: | :'''Attribute''' is a property, an abstraction of a characteristic of an entity or substance. In [[Open assessment | open assessment]] in particular a characteristic of an assessment [[product]] ([[assessment]], [[variable]] or [[class]]), and assessment [[process]] ([[method]]). In [[Open assessment | open assessment]] all these objects have the same set of attributes: | ||
:*[[Name]] | :*[[Name]] | ||
:*[[ | :*[[Question]] | ||
:*[[ | :*[[Answer]] | ||
:*[[ | :*[[Rationale]] | ||
<section end=glossary /> | <section end=glossary /> | ||
[[Category:Glossary term]] | [[Category:Glossary term]] | ||
== | ==Question== | ||
; The research question about attributes: What are attributes and their structure for [[object]]s in [[open assessment]] such that | ; The research question about attributes: What are attributes and their structure for [[object]]s in [[open assessment]] such that | ||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
:* allows for evaluation of performance of the attribute content. | :* allows for evaluation of performance of the attribute content. | ||
== | ==Answer== | ||
{| {{prettytable}} | {| {{prettytable}} | ||
Line 40: | Line 38: | ||
|Name of an object must be unique, and it should be descriptive of what the object is intended to contain, in particular give hints about the scope of the object. | |Name of an object must be unique, and it should be descriptive of what the object is intended to contain, in particular give hints about the scope of the object. | ||
|---- | |---- | ||
|'''[[ | |'''[[Question]] | ||
|Purpose | |Purpose | ||
|What is the research question that this [[object]] attempts to answer? | |What is the research question that this [[object]] attempts to answer? | ||
| Contains a description of the physical and abstract boundaries of the object. For [[assessment]] and [[variable]] objects, scope is an expression of what part of reality the object is intended to describe. Scope does not have a true counterpart in reality, it is always referential to the instrumental use purpose of the object it relates to. | | Contains a description of the physical and abstract boundaries of the object. For [[assessment]] and [[variable]] objects, scope is an expression of what part of reality the object is intended to describe. Scope does not have a true counterpart in reality, it is always referential to the instrumental use purpose of the object it relates to. | ||
|---- | |---- | ||
|'''[[ | |'''[[Answer]] | ||
|State | |||
|What is the answer to the research question? | |||
|Is an expression of the [[state]] of the part of reality that the [[object]] describes. It is the outcome of the contents under the definition attribute. | |||
|---- | |||
|'''[[Rationale]] | |||
|Structure | |Structure | ||
|How can you find out the answer to the research question? | |How can you find out the answer to the research question? | ||
|Attempts to describe the internal structure of the part of reality that the [[object]] is intended to describe and the relations of the [[interior]] with reality outside the scope. For [[assessment]] objects, definition appears in practice as a list of contents. For [[variable]]s, it is a description of how the result of the variable can be derived or calculated. | |Attempts to describe the internal structure of the part of reality that the [[object]] is intended to describe and the relations of the [[interior]] with reality outside the scope. For [[assessment]] objects, definition appears in practice as a list of contents. For [[variable]]s, it is a description of how the result of the variable can be derived or calculated. | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 65: | Line 63: | ||
* Narrative description (to help understanding the actual content). Includes evaluation of performance (e.g. uncertainty analysis, e.g. e.g. evaluation of the calibration of the result against an external standard). | * Narrative description (to help understanding the actual content). Includes evaluation of performance (e.g. uncertainty analysis, e.g. e.g. evaluation of the calibration of the result against an external standard). | ||
* [[Discussion]] (argumentation about issues in the actual content). The resolutions of the discussions are transferred to the actual content. [[Discussion]] is described in detail elsewhere. | * [[Discussion]] (argumentation about issues in the actual content). The resolutions of the discussions are transferred to the actual content. [[Discussion]] is described in detail elsewhere. | ||
==Rationale== | |||
Based on a lot of thinking and discussion especially in 2006-2009. | |||
==See also== | |||
{{opasnet training}} | |||
==References== | |||
<references/> | |||
==Related files== | |||
{{mfiles}} |
Latest revision as of 04:21, 4 January 2013
Moderator:Nobody (see all) Click here to sign up. |
|
Upload data
|
<section begin=glossary />
- Attribute is a property, an abstraction of a characteristic of an entity or substance. In open assessment in particular a characteristic of an assessment product (assessment, variable or class), and assessment process (method). In open assessment all these objects have the same set of attributes:
<section end=glossary />
Question
- The research question about attributes
- What are attributes and their structure for objects in open assessment such that
- they cover all information types that may be needed for an object in an assessment,
- they allow for open participation and discussion about any attribute,
- their contents are subject to scientific criticism, i.e., falsifiable,
- they comply with the PSSP ontology?
- The research question about the attribute contents
- What are parts of the attribute contents such that the attribute
- contains the necessary description of the property under the attribute,
- allows for open participation about the property,
- allows for additional information that increases the applicability of the attribute content,
- allows for evaluation of performance of the attribute content.
Answer
Attribute | PSSP attribute | Question asked | Comments |
---|---|---|---|
Name | - | How should the object be called? | Name of an object must be unique, and it should be descriptive of what the object is intended to contain, in particular give hints about the scope of the object. |
Question | Purpose | What is the research question that this object attempts to answer? | Contains a description of the physical and abstract boundaries of the object. For assessment and variable objects, scope is an expression of what part of reality the object is intended to describe. Scope does not have a true counterpart in reality, it is always referential to the instrumental use purpose of the object it relates to. |
Answer | State | What is the answer to the research question? | Is an expression of the state of the part of reality that the object describes. It is the outcome of the contents under the definition attribute. |
Rationale | Structure | How can you find out the answer to the research question? | Attempts to describe the internal structure of the part of reality that the object is intended to describe and the relations of the interior with reality outside the scope. For assessment objects, definition appears in practice as a list of contents. For variables, it is a description of how the result of the variable can be derived or calculated. |
Despite all the object types mentioned above do have the same unified set of attributes, the sub-attributes can differ (see Assessment and Variable). This derives from the differences in the nature and primary purpose of different object types as well as practical reasons.
In addition to the formally structured objects (e.g. assessments and variables), there may exist objects that do not have a standardized format related to open assessments, such as data or models that are used in defining formally structured objects and their attributes. These freely structured objects are outside the information structure, but can be e.g linked or referred to within the formally defined objects.
Each attribute has three parts:
- Actual content (only this will have an impact on other objects), depending on the nature of the object actual content can be qualitative or quantitative
- Narrative description (to help understanding the actual content). Includes evaluation of performance (e.g. uncertainty analysis, e.g. e.g. evaluation of the calibration of the result against an external standard).
- Discussion (argumentation about issues in the actual content). The resolutions of the discussions are transferred to the actual content. Discussion is described in detail elsewhere.
Rationale
Based on a lot of thinking and discussion especially in 2006-2009.
See also
Help pages | Wiki editing • How to edit wikipages • Quick reference for wiki editing • Drawing graphs • Opasnet policies • Watching pages • Writing formulae • Word to Wiki • Wiki editing Advanced skills |
Training assessment (examples of different objects) | Training assessment • Training exposure • Training health impact • Training costs • Climate change policies and health in Kuopio • Climate change policies in Kuopio |
Methods and concepts | Assessment • Variable • Method • Question • Answer • Rationale • Attribute • Decision • Result • Object-oriented programming in Opasnet • Universal object • Study • Formula • OpasnetBaseUtils • Open assessment • PSSP |
Terms with changed use | Scope • Definition • Result • Tool |
References
Related files
<mfanonymousfilelist></mfanonymousfilelist>