Talk:Goherr: Task 5.3 Determinants of fish eating habits: Difference between revisions

From Opasnet
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (→‎Content of the questionnaire: link to google doc)
 
(16 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
===Organizing the questionnaire===
===Organizing the questionnaire===
* Finland, Sweden, Denmark
* Finland, Sweden, Estonia, Latvia, Denmark
* Do we need statistically representative random sample?
* Sample of 500 responses, representative for each country
** Postal survey? More expensive, intensive, laborious. Resources will not allow use of any company, so we need to make a postal survey by ourselves.
* We provide language versions of the questionnaire, some company will perform the survey.
** Phone survey by a company? Taloustukimus does these also in other countries, might be expensive
* Tested in the stakeholder workshop, participants answer on-line or on paper. Päivi: If time turns out too scarce for a testing session, the questionnaire could be handed out to the participants at the beginning of the workshop with a request to fill it in during the two days and to point out flaws (and potentially to discuss them with Arja). Also, it is useful to ask all project participants to test the questionnaire.
* Email questionnaire by some survey company? Limits study population on consumers with internet access (this might no be a problem as it's anticipated that dioxin does not affect on eating habits in the older groups)
* Tested in the stakeholder workshop, session where participants answer on-line or on paper


===Content of  the questionnaire===
===Content of  the questionnaire===
* Age
Questionnaire has been moved to a Google docs, where it's edited further (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IHyQzzdleM7IVY3PaoVImjxKXVWla6ahL62YuXjKe24/edit?usp=sharing).
* Gender
* City
* Level of education
 
* How often do you eat? and how much do you eat: {{attack|# |These could be left out, as we already have consumption data for Finland, Denmark and Sweden from EFSA.|--[[User:Arja|Arja]] ([[User talk:Arja|talk]]) 04:05, 3 November 2015 (UTC)}}
** Herring (size separated might be too difficult): Once or more per week, 1 - 3 times per month, Rarely, Don't eat at all
** Salmon (Baltic sea?): Once or more per week, 1 - 3 times per month, Rarely, Don't eat at all
*** If not eating: What are the main three reasons for you not to eat Baltic sea fish? (or "Priorities the following based on your reasons of not eating Baltic sea fish, 1 = most important reason"):
**** Don't like the taste
**** Not easily available
**** Difficult to cook
**** Because of the harmful chemicals in it
**** I just prefer to eat some other fish species
**** Don't like any kind of fish
**** Allergy
**** What else?
* Do you limit your consumption of Baltic sea fish (or fish in general?) because of the harmful chemicals in it? Yes/No
** If Yes: Do you think you would consume more Baltic sea fish (salmon and herring?) if amount of the harmful chemicals would be lower? Yes/No {{comment|# |If Yes, we should also know how much more. But to be able to define this, we would need to know the starting level of the consumption|--[[User:Arja|Arja]] ([[User talk:Arja|talk]]) 04:05, 3 November 2015 (UTC)}}
* Are you familiar with the current national recommendations of eating Baltic sea fish? Yes/no
* Are you familiar with the cardiovascular benefits of eating fish? Yes/No


===Other related information===
===Other related information===

Latest revision as of 06:40, 2 February 2016

Organizing the questionnaire

  • Finland, Sweden, Estonia, Latvia, Denmark
  • Sample of 500 responses, representative for each country
  • We provide language versions of the questionnaire, some company will perform the survey.
  • Tested in the stakeholder workshop, participants answer on-line or on paper. Päivi: If time turns out too scarce for a testing session, the questionnaire could be handed out to the participants at the beginning of the workshop with a request to fill it in during the two days and to point out flaws (and potentially to discuss them with Arja). Also, it is useful to ask all project participants to test the questionnaire.

Content of the questionnaire

Questionnaire has been moved to a Google docs, where it's edited further (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IHyQzzdleM7IVY3PaoVImjxKXVWla6ahL62YuXjKe24/edit?usp=sharing).

Other related information

Pro-Kala has done in Finland (2010) a questionnaire

  • 724 participants
  • Questions on use frequencies, type of consumed fish foods, attitudes on herring, how fish eating is predicted to change in the future
    • 70% of participants consume herring at least time to time
    • 24% predicts that use of herring might increase in the near future
  • Includes also question “I’ve stopped eating herring because of dioxins”
    • Seems not to influence on use of herring
  • Based on the questionnaire, population was divided into four groups of consumers: 23% spoiled youngsters (uusavuttomia), 14% critical hi-fi enthusiast, 37% passionate herring lovers and 26% concerned tradition treasurers
Retrieved from "https://en.opasnet.org/index.php?title=Talk:Goherr:_Task_5.3_Determinants_of_fish_eating_habits&oldid=38674"