Talk:Goherr: Task 5.3 Determinants of fish eating habits: Difference between revisions

From Opasnet
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
m (→‎Content of the questionnaire: link to google doc)
 
(19 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
What should the questionnaire include?
===Organizing the questionnaire===
* Age
* Finland, Sweden, Estonia, Latvia, Denmark
* Gender
* Sample of 500 responses, representative for each country
* City
* We provide language versions of the questionnaire, some company will perform the survey.
* Level of education
* Tested in the stakeholder workshop, participants answer on-line or on paper. Päivi: If time turns out too scarce for a testing session, the questionnaire could be handed out to the participants at the beginning of the workshop with a request to fill it in during the two days and to point out flaws (and potentially to discuss them with Arja). Also, it is useful to ask all project participants to test the questionnaire.


* How often and how much do you eat:
===Content of the questionnaire===
** Salmon (Baltic sea?)
Questionnaire has been moved to a Google docs, where it's edited further (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IHyQzzdleM7IVY3PaoVImjxKXVWla6ahL62YuXjKe24/edit?usp=sharing).
** Herring (size separated?)
*** If not eating: What are the main three reasons for you not to eat Baltic sea fish? (Or Priorities the following based on your reasons of not eating Baltic sea fish):
**** Don't like the taste
**** Not easily available
**** Difficult to cook
**** Harmful chemicals in it
**** I just prefer to eat some other fish
**** Don't like any kind of fish
**** Allergy
* Do you limit your consumption of Baltic sea fish (or fish in general?) because of the harmful chemicals in it? Yes/No
** If Yes: Do you think you would consume more Baltic sea fish (salmon and herring?) if amount of the harmful chemicals would be lower? Yes/No
* Are you familiar with the current national recommendations of eating Baltic sea fish? Yes/no
* Are you familiar with the cardiovascular benefits of eating fish? Yes/No


===Other related information===
Pro-Kala has done in Finland (2010) a questionnaire
Pro-Kala has done in Finland (2010) a questionnaire


Line 28: Line 16:
** 24% predicts that use of herring might increase in the near future
** 24% predicts that use of herring might increase in the near future
* Includes also question “I’ve stopped eating herring because of dioxins”
* Includes also question “I’ve stopped eating herring because of dioxins”
* *Seems not influence on use of herring
** Seems not to influence on use of herring
* Based on the questionnaire, population was divided into four groups of consumers: 23% spoiled youngsters (uusavuttomia), 14% critical hi-fi enthusiast, 37% passionate herring lovers and 26% concerned tradition treasurers
* Based on the questionnaire, population was divided into four groups of consumers: 23% spoiled youngsters (uusavuttomia), 14% critical hi-fi enthusiast, 37% passionate herring lovers and 26% concerned tradition treasurers

Latest revision as of 06:40, 2 February 2016

Organizing the questionnaire

  • Finland, Sweden, Estonia, Latvia, Denmark
  • Sample of 500 responses, representative for each country
  • We provide language versions of the questionnaire, some company will perform the survey.
  • Tested in the stakeholder workshop, participants answer on-line or on paper. Päivi: If time turns out too scarce for a testing session, the questionnaire could be handed out to the participants at the beginning of the workshop with a request to fill it in during the two days and to point out flaws (and potentially to discuss them with Arja). Also, it is useful to ask all project participants to test the questionnaire.

Content of the questionnaire

Questionnaire has been moved to a Google docs, where it's edited further (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IHyQzzdleM7IVY3PaoVImjxKXVWla6ahL62YuXjKe24/edit?usp=sharing).

Other related information

Pro-Kala has done in Finland (2010) a questionnaire

  • 724 participants
  • Questions on use frequencies, type of consumed fish foods, attitudes on herring, how fish eating is predicted to change in the future
    • 70% of participants consume herring at least time to time
    • 24% predicts that use of herring might increase in the near future
  • Includes also question “I’ve stopped eating herring because of dioxins”
    • Seems not to influence on use of herring
  • Based on the questionnaire, population was divided into four groups of consumers: 23% spoiled youngsters (uusavuttomia), 14% critical hi-fi enthusiast, 37% passionate herring lovers and 26% concerned tradition treasurers
Retrieved from "https://en.opasnet.org/index.php?title=Talk:Goherr:_Task_5.3_Determinants_of_fish_eating_habits&oldid=38674"