Unattackedstand (paradigm): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Page creation) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[op_fi:Kestää jos ei hyökätä (paradigma)]] | |||
[[Category:Paradigm]] | [[Category:Paradigm]] | ||
[[Category:Open policy practice]] | [[Category:Open policy practice]] | ||
| Line 18: | Line 19: | ||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
* [[ | * [[Insight network]] | ||
* [[Open policy practice]] | * [[Open policy practice]] | ||
* [[Open policy ontology]] | |||
Latest revision as of 11:48, 7 September 2018
| Moderator:Jouni (see all) |
|
|
| Upload data
|
The unattacked stand paradigm is a set of rules to make inferences about validity of arguments. It is used to produce shared understanding and describe differences in thinking.
Question
What inference rules are used when the unattacked stand paradigm is used?
Answer
- If an argument is attacked by a valid argument, it is considered invalid.
Rationale
The paradigm describes the view that everything is valid until proven otherwise.