Talk:Domestic fish consumption of the general population in Finland

From Opasnet
Revision as of 08:34, 3 January 2012 by Jouni (talk | contribs) (discussion moved back from heande:Domestic fish consumption of the general population in Finland)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

moved from Variable Talk:Domestic fish consumption of the general population -- Jouni 10:16, 10 February 2008 (EET)

Imported fish?

How to read discussions

Fact discussion: .
Opening statement:

Closing statement: Resolution not yet found.

(A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.)

Argumentation:

----#(1):: . Is methyl mercury and omega-3 exposure from domestic fish consumption the prevailing one? You should include exposure from imported fish consumption to the model --Olli 15:34, 17 September 2007 (EEST) (type: truth; paradigms: science: comment)

←--#(1):: . You are right. The problem is that concentration data for imported fish is unavailable. With only domestic fish consumption, we attain a better estimate for this risk-benefit comparison --Olli 15:34, 17 September 2007 (EEST) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence)


Loss of fish during process

How to read discussions

Fact discussion: .
Opening statement:

Closing statement: Resolution not yet found.

(A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.)

Argumentation:

⇤--#(1):: . You should include the fact that a proportion of fishery catch is not used for human consumption, but it goes to waste and for other purposes --Olli 15:45, 17 September 2007 (EEST) (type: truth; paradigms: science: attack)

⇤--#(1):: . This has been taken into account in this variable --Olli 15:45, 17 September 2007 (EEST) (type: truth; paradigms: science: attack)