Talk:PM2.5 exposure-response function

From Opasnet
Revision as of 13:26, 18 February 2009 by Dvienneau (talk | contribs) (New section: apples and oranges)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Exposure data availability

{{discussion |Dispute= Relevance of scope is not possible to be evaluated. |Outcome= Under discussion (to be changed when a conclusion is found) |Argumentan = ←--#:: . In order to know the relevance of the ER function we need to know what exposure data will be available. However,we will assume that data from ambient monitoring sites is available. This will be considered a proxy for "personal exposure data".--Dvienneau 15:16, 18 February 2009 (EET) {{{3}}} (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence)

apples and oranges

{{discussion |Dispute= Existing ER functions don't match exposure |Outcome= Under discussion (to be changed when a conclusion is found) |Argumentation = ←--#:: . The ER functions from Dockery, Pope etc derive from ambient exposures, not personal --Dvienneau 15:26, 18 February 2009 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence)