Talk:Discussion

From Opasnet
Revision as of 09:20, 12 July 2018 by Jouni (talk | contribs) (moved from Talk:Discussion structure)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Names of the discussion parts

How to read discussions

Fact discussion: .
Opening statement: The names of the discussion parts have been dispute, argumentation, outcome. These should be changed to statement, argumentation, resolution.

Closing statement: Accepted.

(A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.)

Argumentation:

←--1: . Dispute does not give guidance on the structure of the part. This has resulted in many discussions where the dispute is expressed as a question. This is not the idea. It should be expressed as two or more statements. Therefore, statements is a better name. --Jouni 08:42, 22 November 2008 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence)

←--2: . Resolution is a more precise term and it clearly refers to the dispute, while outcome can be an outcome of anything. It can be e.g. confused with the result. --Jouni 08:42, 22 November 2008 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence)