Talk:Domestic fish consumption of the general population in Finland

Imported fish?

How to read discussions

Fact discussion: .
Opening statement: Closing statement: Resolution not yet found. (A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.)
Argumentation: ----#(1):: . Is methyl mercury and omega-3 exposure from domestic fish consumption the prevailing one? You should include exposure from imported fish consumption to the model --Olli 15:34, 17 September 2007 (EEST) (type: truth; paradigms: science: comment) ←--#(1):: . You are right. The problem is that concentration data for imported fish is unavailable. With only domestic fish consumption, we attain a better estimate for this risk-benefit comparison --Olli 15:34, 17 September 2007 (EEST) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence)

Loss of fish during process

How to read discussions

Fact discussion: .
Opening statement: Closing statement: Resolution not yet found. (A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.)
Argumentation: ⇤--#(1):: . You should include the fact that a proportion of fishery catch is not used for human consumption, but it goes to waste and for other purposes --Olli 15:45, 17 September 2007 (EEST) (type: truth; paradigms: science: attack) ⇤--#(1):: . This has been taken into account in this variable --Olli 15:45, 17 September 2007 (EEST) (type: truth; paradigms: science: attack)