Evaluating impact on option's lead to equality

From Opasnet
Revision as of 11:58, 8 December 2009 by Jouni (talk | contribs) (EU funded projects in the Cordis database added)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search



Scope

Does the option lead directly or indirectly to greater in/equality?[1]

Definition

The issue of inequality is of great importance in European policies, especially in relation to enlargement of the European Union (EU - 25 and EU 27). The convergence of income, purchasing power, employment, market efficiency within the European Union is needed in order to achieve the new Lisbon Strategy objectives. The attention to inequality problems is of particular importance when the proposal has the aim of fighting markets inefficiency, and seeking for Pareto - efficiency; in these cases policies may easily generate inequality in the short run, if the issue is not properly addressed. Also policies dealing with distributional effects, in principle focused on inequality problems, may generate income differences among particular categories of affected stakeholders. Although inequality can be seen in economic terms and in social terms, the two dimensions are very strictly related: for example an increased income gap may easily generate social exclusion, difficult access to essential services for the poor.[1]

Result

Indicators:

The following Eurostat Structural Indicators are relevant to address the key question:

The following Sustainable Development Indicators (Monetary poverty) are relevant to address the key question:

See also


EU funded projects from Cordis database

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 JRC: IA TOOLS. Supporting inpact assessment in the European Commission. [1]

This text is for information only and is not designed to interpret or replace any reference documents. The text is partially adapted from:

DG Employment: Social inclusion process