Main crop scenarios in IEHIAS

From Opasnet
Revision as of 08:09, 7 August 2014 by Heta (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:IEHIAS Category:IEHIAS Scenarios :''The text on this page is taken from an equivalent page of the IEHIAS-project. '''Scenarios in the Greece ...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The text on this page is taken from an equivalent page of the IEHIAS-project.

Scenarios in the Greece case study

To provide a basis for the assessment of health impacts of agricultural land use change in Greece, scenarios had to be developed describing the likely distribution of cropping and livestock systems across the country under different possible 'futures'. Two scenarios were defined for this purpose: a 'business-as-usual' scenario and a 'climate mitigation' scenario. Each of these required some further development of the baseline information provided by the ATEAM model.

(i) Baseline 16x16km dataset from National Statistical Service of Greece (ESYE)

Arable land data at LAU-2 level (General Secretariat of the National Statistical Service of Greece – ESYE) were aggregated to 16x16km and compared to the arable land estimates from the ATEAM model. Differences between the two were normalised with respect to the ESYE data. In addition, crop data (including cereals, cotton, maize and sugar beet) from ESYE LAU-2 level were aggregated to 16x16km, in order to generate a crop distribution for each grid cell. A subset of livestock data (including cows, pigs, sheep and goats) was regressed against grassland area, available from the ATEAM. The remaining animals (including pigs and poultry) are estimated from the GAINS model and are included in the baseline data.

(ii) Business-as-usual scenario

The business-as-usual scenario was derived by projecting current land use estimates forward, under the IPCC A1 Scenario for 2020 and 2050. Changes in arable land in years 2020 and 2050 (from ATEAM) are utilised to project the baseline crop distributions into the future. In addition, three energy crops are included in the future data-set: sunflowers (33.3%), sorghum (33.3%) and cardoon (33.3%). Animal numbers are projected to 2020 and 2050 proportional to the estimated changes in grassland area, as indicated by the ATEAM model.

(iii) Mitigation scenario

The mitigation scenario was derived by taking account of climate change mitigation policies and future CAP developments, within the context of the IPCC B1 scenario. The baseline (2004) crop distribution is modified by reducing the proportion of (water consuming) cotton by 40% in 2020 and by 75% in 2050. The land released as a result is allocated to cereals (25% in 2020, 45% in 2050) and maize (15% in 2020, 30% in 2050). Energy crop and animal data are included in the analysis in a similar manner as in the IPCC A1 scenario.

See also