Talk:Bus engine technology

Scope -- Anne.knol 17:13, 20 February 2008 (EET)

How to read discussions

Fact discussion: .
Opening statement: Closing statement: Resolution not yet found. (A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.)
Argumentation: ←--#(1):: . Engine technology alternatives are independent of the region --Anne.knol 17:13, 20 February 2008 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence) ←--#(2):: . The engine technology alternatives are not dependent on Helsinki Metropolitan Area --Jgrellier 17:21, 20 February 2008 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence) ←--#(4):: . Bus engine technology is dependent on broad geographical area e.g. western Europe vs. India --Jgrellier 17:21, 20 February 2008 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence) ←--#(3):: . Then we should add a broad geographical area (e.g. western Europe) instead of Helsinki --Anne.knol 17:26, 20 February 2008 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence) ←--#(5):: . I agree. The scope should be changed into "the western Europe". --Jouni 17:55, 20 February 2008 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence)