Talk:Emission factors for burning processes

Variable boundaries

How to read discussions

Fact discussion: .
Opening statement: Boundaries for emission factors (EF) should be clarified Closing statement: Under discussion (to be changed when a conclusion is found) (A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.)
Argumentation: ←--#:: . We have to think the boundaries of EF variable. Need for more than Hki area factors is obvious. Should it be as in headline: "EF's for burning processes" in Finland? --Pauliina 09:15, 23 April 2009 (EEST) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence)

EF for burning processes or EF by fuel types

How to read discussions

Fact discussion: .
Opening statement: Scope of the variable should be EF for fuel types. Closing statement: Under discussion (to be changed when a conclusion is found) (A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.)
Argumentation: ⇤--#: . In Bioher we are looking for EF's for four different fuel types: wood, pellet, heavy and light oil. This variable should be focusing on these four fuel types. Name should be transferred. --Pauliina 10:28, 8 March 2010 (UTC) (type: truth; paradigms: science: attack)