Opasnet talk:Sandbox

Discussion again

How to read discussions

Fact discussion: .
Opening statement: Closing statement: Resolution not yet found. (A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.)
Argumentation: ⇤--#1:: . Definitely not --Mikko Pohjola 15:39, 28 May 2007 (EEST) (type: truth; paradigms: science: attack) ⇤--#2:: . Oh yes it is!! --Mikko Pohjola 15:39, 28 May 2007 (EEST) (type: truth; paradigms: science: attack) ←--#4:: . I so agree --Mikko Pohjola 15:39, 28 May 2007 (EEST) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence) ←--#3:: . I think so --Mikko Pohjola 15:39, 28 May 2007 (EEST) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence) ----#5:: . What a stupid discussion! --Mikko Pohjola 15:39, 28 May 2007 (EEST) (type: truth; paradigms: science: comment)