Talk:Assessment: Difference between revisions

From Opasnet
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(relevant discussions moved to assessment structure)
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
== Clarification of terms ==
{{discussion
{{discussion
|Dispute= Clarify the meanings of the words "assessment product" and "endpoints"
|Dispute= Clarify the meanings of the words "assessment product" and "endpoints"

Revision as of 04:55, 21 April 2009

Clarification of terms

How to read discussions

Fact discussion: .
Opening statement:

Closing statement: Resolution not yet found.

(A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.)

Argumentation:

←--#1:: . Using assessment product and endpoints is a bit confusing. what do you mean by this? results of the indicator variables?, results of the assessment? (whatever this is), health endpoints? Is the assessment product the assessment as a whole (i.e. net of variables at a certain stage in time) or the results of certain indicators? --Alexandra Kuhn 12:17, 14 May 2008 (EEST) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence)

----#2:: . Assessment product is now defined. The word endpoint is no longer used. Result is the attribute for variables and assessments. The result of an assessment is a compilation of the results of all indicators and analyses in the assessment. --Jouni 23:16, 14 May 2008 (EEST) (type: truth; paradigms: science: comment)
----#(number):: . Much better! So is the assessment product the same as the result of the assessment as you define it in your comment? If yes, we should add that definition in brackets to the first item of the article page. --Alexandra Kuhn 07:45, 16 May 2008 (EEST) (type: truth; paradigms: science: comment)