Talk:General assessment framework: Difference between revisions

From Opasnet
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(resolution)
(Replacing page with 'REDIRECT heande:Talk:General assessment framework')
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{discussion |Dispute= There is no difference between cost-benefit analysis and benefit-cost analysis. |Outcome= Accepted. |Argumentation = {{comment|#1: |Is there a difference between benefit cost analyses and cost benefit analyses?|--[[User:Alexandra Kuhn|Alexandra Kuhn]] 17:42, 6 March 2008 (EET)}}
REDIRECT [[:heande:Talk:General assessment framework]]
 
{{defend|#2: |There is no substantive difference. The traditional term is cost-benefit analysis. Then some marketing experts realised that the term would have a more positive connotation if the benefits were mentioned first. So, those economists who try to be positive talk about benefit-cost analysis.|--[[User:Jouni|Jouni]] 23:59, 7 March 2008 (EET)}}
}}

Latest revision as of 11:03, 4 March 2009