Talk:PM2.5 exposure-response function: Difference between revisions

From Opasnet
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Exposure data availability)
 
(New section: apples and oranges)
Line 6: Line 6:
|Argumentan =
|Argumentan =
{{defend|#: |In order to know the relevance of the ER function we need to know what exposure data will be available.  However,we will assume that data from ambient monitoring sites is available.  This will be considered a proxy for "personal exposure data".--[[User:Dvienneau|Dvienneau]] 15:16, 18 February 2009 (EET)}}
{{defend|#: |In order to know the relevance of the ER function we need to know what exposure data will be available.  However,we will assume that data from ambient monitoring sites is available.  This will be considered a proxy for "personal exposure data".--[[User:Dvienneau|Dvienneau]] 15:16, 18 February 2009 (EET)}}
== apples and oranges ==
{{discussion
|Dispute= Existing ER functions don't match exposure 
|Outcome= Under discussion (to be changed when a conclusion is found)
|Argumentation = {{defend|#: |The ER functions from Dockery, Pope etc derive from ambient exposures, not personal|--[[User:Dvienneau|Dvienneau]] 15:26, 18 February 2009 (EET)}}

Revision as of 13:26, 18 February 2009

Exposure data availability

{{discussion |Dispute= Relevance of scope is not possible to be evaluated. |Outcome= Under discussion (to be changed when a conclusion is found) |Argumentan = ←--#:: . In order to know the relevance of the ER function we need to know what exposure data will be available. However,we will assume that data from ambient monitoring sites is available. This will be considered a proxy for "personal exposure data".--Dvienneau 15:16, 18 February 2009 (EET) {{{3}}} (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence)

apples and oranges

{{discussion |Dispute= Existing ER functions don't match exposure |Outcome= Under discussion (to be changed when a conclusion is found) |Argumentation = ←--#:: . The ER functions from Dockery, Pope etc derive from ambient exposures, not personal --Dvienneau 15:26, 18 February 2009 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence)